

Elastic Search and webMethods.io are key players in enterprise IT solutions, focusing on data visualization and integration, respectively. Elastic Search appears to hold an advantage in log monitoring and data analytics, while webMethods.io excels in integration and process automation capabilities.
Features: Elastic Search integrates Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana, offering robust scalability, machine learning capabilities, and effective handling of unstructured data. WebMethods.io supports diverse integration adapters and provides advanced debugging tools, making it ideal for businesses requiring detailed process automation.
Room for Improvement: Elastic Search needs improvement in security, machine learning tools, and user-friendliness in the interface. Its data handling and indexing scalability also require optimization. WebMethods.io could benefit from better scalability for larger data centers, optimized costs, enhanced documentation, and streamlined integration capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Search offers flexible deployment across on-premises and cloud environments and benefits from a large community for support, with faster assistance through paid plans. WebMethods.io supports hybrid cloud deployment and provides comprehensive technical support, although its setup can be complex initially.
Pricing and ROI: Elastic Search is open-source, with costs in implementation and support, while webMethods.io is generally more expensive but provides a robust feature set for large enterprises. Elastic Search users find value in its ROI for scalable solutions, while webMethods.io offers a good cost-to-feature ratio.
We have not purchased any licensed products, and our use of Elastic Search is purely open-source, contributing positively to our ROI.
It is stable, and we do not encounter critical issues like server downtime, which could result in data loss.
The main benefits observed from using Elastic Search include improvements in operational efficiency, along with cost, time, and resource savings.
The customer support for Elastic Search is one of the best I have ever tried.
They have always been really responsible and responsive to my requests.
It has been sufficient to visit conferences such as SCALE in Southern California Linux Expo, where Elastic Search has a booth to talk to their staff.
An incident portal is available where we can raise tickets and based on priority, they reply.
I would rate its scalability a ten.
Since we're on the cloud, whenever we need to upgrade or add resources, they handle everything.
We haven't encountered any problems so far, and there is the potential for auto-scaling.
Whenever more resources are needed, they become available automatically without any human interference.
If any webMethods.io product is installed on-premises and a company wants to scale its application, either vertical scaling or horizontal scaling is needed.
Vertically, scalability is fine, however, I have not expanded horizontally with the product yet.
The data transfer sometimes exceeded the bandwidth limits without proper notification, which caused issues.
The stability of Elasticsearch was very high.
When you put one keyword, everything related to that keyword in your ecosystem will showcase all the results.
There are some issues like the tool hanging or the need for additional jars when exposing web services.
We provide support to our clients, and the minimum calls I receive are for webMethods.io; it's very stable.
From a technical point of view, there are no significant issues recalled as Elastic Search has been absolutely awesome for this use case and covers 100% of the needs.
If I need to parse one million records saved into Elastic Search, it becomes a nightmare because I need to do the pagination, and it is very problematic in that regard.
Observability features like search latency, indexing rate, and maybe rejected requests should be added to make the platform more reliable and accessible for everyone.
webMethods.io lacks advanced monitoring and analytics capabilities, so my customers need to use something additional.
When comparing the license cost and request per minute cost, webMethods.io needs to address that.
A special discount of at least 50% for old customers would allow us to expand our services and request more resources.
On the AWS side, it is very expensive because they charge based on query basis or how much data is transferred in and out, making it very expensive.
Having the hosted solution and not having to pay for essentially a DevOps person on staff to manage makes it affordable.
You can host it on-premises, which would incur zero cost, or take it as a SaaS-based service, where the expenses remain minimal.
Regarding the pricing and licensing of webMethods.io, I don't think it's expensive when compared with the features.
Elastic Search makes handling large data volumes efficient and supports complex search operations.
The most valuable feature of Elasticsearch was the quick search capability, allowing us to search by any criteria needed.
The speed with which Elastic Search is able to search through all of the documents we place into it is quite remarkable, as we search through 65 billion documents in less than a second in most cases, on a constant consistent basis.
It facilitates the exposure of around 235 services through our platform to feed various government entities across the entire country.
If we want to make a REST API, SOAP, REST, or any other type, all kinds of things are put in one box and we can make anything we want to.
I believe data transformation is exceptional in webMethods.io because they have an online database that can cache the database online.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Elastic Search | 1.6% |
| webMethods.io | 4.4% |
| Other | 94.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 43 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 64 |
Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.
Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.
Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.
At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.
Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.
In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.
webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.