We performed a comparison between Elastic Search and Oracle GoldenGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is quite scalable and this is one of its advantages."
"The most valuable feature is the out of the box Kibana."
"There's lots of processing power. You can actually just add machines to get more performance if you need to. It's pretty flexible and very easy to add another log. It's not like 'oh, no, it's going to be so much extra data'. That's not a problem for the machine. It can handle it."
"I really like the visualization that you can do within it. That's really handy. Product-wise, it is a very good and stable product."
"The most valuable features are the data store and the X-pack extension."
"It's a stable solution and we have not had any issues."
"We had many reasons to implement Elasticsearch for search term solutions. Elasticsearch products provide enterprise landscape support for different areas of the company."
"The UI is very nice, and performance wise it's quite good too."
"Many of the features of Oracle GoldenGate are valuable. We use Oracle databases and this tool is from Oracle, making it have superior compatibility."
"You can use Oracle GoldenGate as a DR for your system."
"Oracle GoldenGate features work fine, which is what I like about it. I also like that it's scalable, easy to set up, and has good technical support."
"The solution is useful for data transformation."
"It moves the data as you set it up, and it works. I am also very impressed with its stability and scalability. It is not super feature-rich, but the new releases have more functionality. It recently had more native integrations with Oracle Database. If you are using it against an Oracle database, it has a lot more functionality."
"They've recently improved the ease of implementation."
"When we are replicating data between similar databases then it is straightforward."
"This solution provides us with real-time replication and it does not affect the performance of other operations, which is very important to us."
"The different applications need to be individually deployed."
"There is a lack of technical people to develop, implement and optimize equipment operation and web queries."
"Something that could be improved is better integrations with Cortex and QRadar, for example."
"We have an issue with the volume of data that we can handle."
"We see the need for some improvements with Elasticsearch. We would like the Elasticsearch package to include training lessons for our staff."
"The documentation regarding customization could be better."
"Could have more open source tools and testing."
"The solution's integration and configuration are not easy. Not many people know exactly what to do."
"Troubleshooting issues is not always the easiest. It should be easier to troubleshoot. Their support can also be improved. They don't read your problem statement and waste a lot of time. GoldenGate for big data is actually a separate license. It is sort of a separate product, but it might fall underneath your GoldenGate category. If we're talking about big data, its interaction with big data sources is poorly documented."
"I find the user interface to be difficult for non-technical people."
"The solution, in general, should be easier to use, with less need to perform workarounds within the system."
"The solution's performance needs improvement."
"What needs improvement in Oracle GoldenGate is the support. Another feature that needs to be improved in the solution is its GUI. It would be useful for programmers or users to be able to work from the GUI, not just from the command line. Simplifying how Oracle GoldenGate is used would also make the solution better."
"We struggle with memory. It's limited. However, it may be because of our unique business case and how we use it that it's limiting for us."
"You cannot put everything in Golden Gate for the license and large models."
"There are a lot of bugs in the solution."
Elastic Search is ranked 9th in Cloud Data Integration with 59 reviews while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews. Elastic Search is rated 8.2, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Elastic Search writes "Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". Elastic Search is most compared with Faiss, Milvus, Pinecone, Azure Search and Amazon Kendra, whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI). See our Elastic Search vs. Oracle GoldenGate report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
