DX Performance Management vs Entuity comparison

Broadcom and Park Place Technologies are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #57 with an average rating of 8.5, while Park Place Technologies is ranked #40 with an average rating of 9.0. Broadcom holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Park Place Technologies’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Park Place Technologies users who would recommend it.

DX Performance Management

Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews

432 Views
132 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Entuity

Read 11 Entuity reviews

921 Views
486 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX Performance Management

Entuity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Entuity and DX Performance Management are competing in the network performance management category. While both address different needs, DX Performance Management has an upper hand due to its advanced analytics which offer more in-depth features compared to Entuity.

Features: Entuity provides robust network monitoring, efficient alerting, and management capabilities focusing on real-time insights and detailed reports. It ensures effective delivery of essential monitoring functions. DX Performance Management offers superior performance analytics, enhanced scalability, and integrated service-level management which are ideal for organizations requiring extensive data analysis.

Room for Improvement: Entuity lacks some advanced analytics capabilities that its competitor offers which could enhance its offering for data-heavy organizations. Additionally, its scalability may fall short for very large enterprises. More integration options could also expand its appeal. DX Performance Management could improve by offering a simpler deployment process for faster onboarding, providing more user-friendly interfaces, and reducing the high initial investment to make it more accessible to smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entuity stands out with a straightforward deployment model and supportive customer service that facilitate a smooth onboarding process. DX Performance Management, on the other hand, presents a more complex deployment scenario but makes up for it with extensive customer support and training resources, which can be beneficial for clients seeking comprehensive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Entuity is typically more cost-effective with lower initial setup costs, making it appealing for small to mid-sized enterprises looking for immediate ROI. Its pricing structure suits budget-conscious buyers. DX Performance Management requires a higher initial investment, justified by its comprehensive feature set which promises long-term ROI through improved network performance, suitable for those prioritizing advanced capabilities over upfront cost savings.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Performance Management vs. Entuity Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. Entuity

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Performance Management

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

57th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (2nd), DX NetOps (2nd)

Entuity

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

40th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Performance Management is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Entuity is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sandip Kheni

Lead Developer at STL - Sterlite Technologies Limited

The vertical database loads faster than any other product available

We experience disconnections between the solutions own components. In the last five years, there have been many intermittent connection issues with the four components and we still don't know the reasons. The solution has issues when loading groups that have been created in the application interfaces. It would be nice to have a mobile application. In the current industry and technical word, the mobile phone is the only thing that is always in your hands. Other Broadcom products have mobile applications but the solution doesn't offer one. It would be great to view device parameters and view or download graphs from a mobile device.

Read full review

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

A good solution for network monitoring and support management, but there is no centralized database

There is no centralized database. It is an issue if you use a local database and have multiple borders. However, if you have an external database, you can keep the same old data from an old border up to 100 borders. In addition, if we want to create an ABI or use an ABI to connect data, there is no competition when we ask for support. If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service. Other competitors like Micro Focus, a network management system, have a new supportability matrix in the market every quarter.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When devices are having performance issues, it proactively build dashboards which allow us to go and do health checks, and resolve problems before they become an issue."

"The capability where not only the traditional SNMP information is captured but also the netflow data; who is consuming the data on the WAN, and voice-related information, is helpful. The voice quality makes it very easy for first- and second-line operators to see where the issue is, and who is impacted."

"The out-of-the-box dashboards are valuable, in terms of being able to visualize performance data in ways that we haven't in the past."

"There is another component of the tool called Network Flow Analysis. It gives us the ability to troubleshoot issues which do not appear right away."

"The integration with NetFlow, the NFA solution, so that we can have our flow forensics paired with the SNMP polling performance metrics on the same page."

"We're able to present data from multiple back-end collection sources into a single dashboard for the users. So they don't have to go to multiple locations to get data about a particular item, or device."

"One of the most valuable features is the ease of use."

"It is the gathering of the whole performance data in our environment and our network environment, for us and our customers."

More DX Performance Management pros

"The most valuable feature of Entuity is network mapping and information. When clicking on a particular location it can automatically survey the connectivity diagram for us. We can arrange this icon in any kind of formats, such as ring or mesh. The networking mapping can show the components and interconnectivity with the help of IP addresses and NetFlow."

"The setup was very simple and took about an hour."

"Event management and the geographical Google API-based network topology are the most valuable features of Entuity."

"The best thing about Entuity is that it's easy to use. It's user-friendly. It's intuitive and easy to customize as per your needs."

"The initial setup of Entuity is easy and the full process took approximately 30 minutes."

"We find the SurePath component of this solution to be very valuable, as it gives us the path to whatever we are configuring."

"One of the most valuable features of Entuity is the user interface."

"Entuity's best feature is its ability to monitor a large number of devices."

More Entuity pros

Cons

"Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected."

"When it goes through discovery, or whatever it is doing in the back-end that slows it down, sometimes we get some failures with it. "

"We experience disconnections between the solutions own components."

"Some of the individual report views, the way some of the columns sort, there's room for improvement in giving us more flexibility in being able to sort reports based, for example, on what columns the metrics fall under."

"I think it would be helpful having a more comprehensive set of certifications so that I could natively deploy devices to my environment and the tool would immediately recognize and immediately be able to provide relevant performance information without a lot of tuning on my part."

"DX Performance Management should increase high availability. If one of my two data centers goes offline and the other is operational, I need a seamless transition from the primary to the secondary data center. It's crucial to maintain consistent monitoring of the devices during this transition. Therefore, I require continuous, 24/7 monitoring of my system using this tool."

"There are some areas in the technology right now, like with VMs, where we are lacking with our abilities to get inside the VM to monitor traffic within the machine."

"CA PM can be complex to build and configure. Creating the folders / groups / sites required establishing many rule sets."

More DX Performance Management cons

"It should support IPAM or IP Address Management. When it comes to the network, IP Address Management is a feature for which we have to use a different solution. When we are managing networks, if IPAM also becomes a part of this, we do not have to look for a separate solution."

"Entuity currently has APIs, but they are not straightforward. They are not flexible if an external system wants to communicate with Entuity or create an integration that is not available out of the box. Its APIs can be flexible so that they can be utilized for external integrations that are not available out of the box."

"In the most recent versions, Entuity has removed the Explorer navigation feature. This was very useful, and Entuity would be improved by restoring it."

"A typical user might want to see even more depth to the standard reporting and ease of integration."

"Entuity could improve by having more integration because now network management is not a standalone solution. You have to integrate it with your network, applications, and everything else. We have to collect that information from those solutions or relevant managers. Additionally, the SLA dashboard should be improved."

"Entuity can improve the fetching of device configuration. The solution uses scripts and I could not understand them or find any recourses on the internet to learn about the language that is used in the script. It could be more user-friendly and the device configuration management could be enhanced."

"If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service."

"We would like the backup element of this solution to be improved as, at present, it is very limited and does not have much scope for customization."

More Entuity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"It varies and depends on the quantity. It's worth the cost."

"Entuity's licensing is very highly-priced."

"We have 400 licenses and we are only using 150 licenses."

"Entuity is not an expensive solution."

"It can be comparatively expensive but that is because it is comprehensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DX Performance Management?

The tool helps us understand network performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Performance Management?

The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.

See all answers

What do you like most about Entuity?

Event management and the geographical Google API-based network topology are the most valuable features of Entuity.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Entuity?

We work with other solutions. We have a very good relationship with Entuity Commercial. You can negotiate discounts and provide better proposals to our customers. The pricing is very competitive. T...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Entuity?

Entuity could integrate with other solutions and collect more information from IoT devices.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management

Compared 35% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs DX Performance Management

Compared 35% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management

Compared 29% of the time

More DX Performance Management Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Entuity

Compared 45% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 12% of the time

NetBrain vs Entuity

Compared 9% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Entuity

Compared 8% of the time

Centreon vs Entuity

Compared 7% of the time

More Entuity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management

June 2025

Download DX Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Entuity

June 2025

Download Entuity product report

Also Known As

CA Performance Management

No data available

Overview

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom

Entuity network management software continually monitors network bandwidth, network error rate and network congestion, which are all factors that impact overall network throughput. Events can be raised in response to abnormal traffic to allow remedial action before users are impacted. The Entuity network monitor continually evaluates network latency and network jitter to calculate MOS and ICPIF scores. Events can be raised when these scores are unacceptable for business application, voice and video performance. Key Features include: Root Cause Analysis, Event Management, Flow Monitoring & Analysis, Application Path Monitoring and Network Performance Monitoring.

Park Place Technologies

Sample Customers

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

Tait Communications, Vattenfall, Discovery, University of Minnesota, Pernod Ricard, Electric Car

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. Entuity

June 2025

Free Report: DX Performance Management vs. Entuity

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Performance Management vs. Entuity and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Performance Management vs. Entuity report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.