No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

DocuWare vs Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DocuWare
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
25th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Storage (57th), Document Management Software (7th), Content Collaboration Platforms (39th)
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows ...
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
55th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of DocuWare is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is 0.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
DocuWare1.2%
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x70.3%
Other98.5%
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

RC
Enterprise Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Great document storing and easy to set up but needs to offer more collaboration capabilities
It should have collaboration features. For example, if I upload a document and I want the document which I upload to be discussed among my colleagues and peers, I should be able to share. I'd like for us to be collaborating, discussing the document, adding to the document, et cetera. I'd like it to be possible for teams to collaboratively create the document. Compliance or records management could be improved. For example, if I upload a document, a legal document such as a contract, when you onboard a new customer, you would like to have that contract document stored. At the same time, it should be logged. Once a document is approved and taken by printout and sent to the customer, it should be logged. It should not be allowed to be editable; you shouldn't be able to make changes to it. For records management, it should only be accessible to some people, not everyone. I would like to have records management features and compliance features where data could be hidden. Items such as personal data should be hidden or masked. I would like to have GDPR features added. We had some slight hiccups during the setup process.
Christine Ndanu - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at PwC
Cloud file management has improved collaboration and strengthened security across our teams
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by improving collaboration, especially through remote collaboration due to the use of a mobile application. Security posture in my organization has really improved due to the robust security features of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. Furthermore, it can be accessed from anywhere, making collaboration easy. Some of the best features Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 offers are in-built Office suite, works just from any browser, cloud-based, no additional app download is required, alerts and notifications are on par, version control to view any changes made, and access control over any file or folder. The mobile application and remote collaboration features helped my team improve collaboration and also increased our security posture after we implemented Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 in all our organization departments.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For the most part, the initial setup is easy. There's good documentation."
"DocuWare allows for easy document management and workflow automation, eliminating the need for physical paperwork and streamlining the approval process."
"Since I started using Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, it has increased productivity, with collaboration improving from forty to fifty-five percent."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by providing savings through automation, giving our clients the best replacement for desk jobs and the best way to automate daily tasks."
"My main use case for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is that it serves as a great collaboration tool."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by making processes easier and improving productivity."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is a great tool that has led to faster turnaround times, less back and forth, improved customer service, more transparency into team functions, elimination of steps through processes, and reengineering, thereby saving cost and time."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by greatly increasing our collaboration, especially between departmental and remote collaboration."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has improved our productivity, especially through improved collaboration, from 50 to 65%."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by reducing the cost of having tangible memory devices since Microsoft Sharepoint provides unlimited cloud storage."
 

Cons

"It should have collaboration features."
"Its graphical user interface could be more user-friendly."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved as it still needs to integrate some services together such as Planner and Lists so that teams can interact from a single place."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved by making the user interface more intuitive and easy to customize."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved in browser support, which is one of the biggest areas where Sharepoint can improve."
"Occasionally, we would somehow have an issue with one or two users not seeing the latest document, which was a minor annoyance, but after a few minutes, we were able to get back on track due to Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7."
"One way Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved is by merging two or more Sharepoint sites from different companies together if they are working together."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is very easy to use, but it has some drawbacks in that typical user experience is perceived by many users as difficult or clunky."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved with configuration that is simple without becoming complex and does not depend heavily on the IT department."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved with better documentation, especially the online documentation for new learners."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the price may be considered slightly high, it is still reasonable within the context of other options available on the market."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Healthcare Company
6%
Retailer
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise10
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

King Hussein Cancer Center, Smart Choice, Tippecanoe County
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2026.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.