Docker vs Komodor comparison

Docker and Komodor are both solutions in the Container Management category. Docker is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.9, while Komodor is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0. Docker holds a 2.7% mindshare in CM, compared to Komodor’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Docker users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Komodor users who would recommend it.

Docker

Read 56 Docker reviews

1,362 Views
1,085 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Komodor

Read 5 Komodor reviews

1,227 Views
413 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Docker

Komodor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

Komodor and Docker offer solutions in the container and Kubernetes space, with Docker generally having the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and ecosystem support.

Features: Komodor provides advanced monitoring and troubleshooting tools for Kubernetes environments, offering real-time alerts and seamless integration with various platforms. Notable features include its multi-cluster centralized event timeline, historical data analysis, and efficient logging capabilities. On the other hand, Docker excels in container management, featuring a robust containerization system, efficient CI/CD integration, and a user-friendly interface. Docker's versatility in creating consistent environments across development and production systems is a key advantage.

Room for Improvement: Komodor could improve by enhancing user interface intuitiveness, expanding multi-cloud support, and reducing complexity for new users unfamiliar with Kubernetes. Docker might benefit from optimizing resource usage, addressing scalability issues in large deployments, and improving integration depth with Kubernetes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Docker provides a straightforward deployment experience supported by extensive documentation and a large user community, promoting fast adoption. Komodor offers focused onboarding and proactive support, assisting teams new to Kubernetes troubleshooting, ensuring reduced operational friction.

Pricing and ROI: Komodor's pricing is structured to provide significant value for Kubernetes-centric operations, offering faster ROI through reduced time in troubleshooting. Docker's pricing aligns with its robust feature set and mature ecosystem, supporting sustainable, long-term investments for extensive container management needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Docker vs. Komodor Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Docker vs. Komodor

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Docker

Ranking in Container Management

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Development Platforms (1st), Software Supply Chain Security (6th)

Komodor

Ranking in Container Management

13th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Docker is 2.7%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Komodor is 3.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Rikin Parekh

Backend Engineer at Northeastern University

Useful to create sandbox environments to run applications and makes it easy to test them

Overall, setting up the Docker environment is quite easy. Many methods exist, such as using Docker Compose and Docker networks to communicate between containers. The main challenge lies in designing the architecture and integrating different frameworks and microservices. I would rate the ease of setting up the tool at around nine out of ten. The time it takes to deploy depends on the scale of the system. For the early-stage startup I'm currently working with, it doesn't take much time. It's just me handling the deployment. In our early-stage startup, we have a couple of teams with around four to five backend APIs and two front-end services. Deploying these doesn't take much time. My focus is more on minimizing costs due to our lean startup structure.

Read full review

Jacek Kisynski

Senior Staff Software Developer at Visier

Makes it easier for our development team to "own" Kubernetes, saving our SRE team time

There's nothing in particular that is wrong with Komodor. It's hard to say that there's something we would really like to see improved. I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development. I would like to see if we're utilizing nodes in the cluster, if pod allocation is optimal, how much idling we have, and whether we scale up and down efficiently. I would like to see them help us optimize costs further. Because, as our company grows and our clusters get busier and busier, any inefficiency is a lot of money wasted. That's definitely high on our wish list: anything that helps us track wasted resources.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to install."

"There are ways of using Docker where you have absolutely no dependencies on the environment that you work in. This allows us to deploy Docker anywhere anytime and this has been most valuable."

"The capability of the solution to convert an application into a Docker image is a vital functionality"

"The current version is quite good with our application."

"It is neat and very flexible."

"The solution's most valuable feature is having containers independent of the operating system or environment."

"We are able to stop our containers or stop the service with a single command."

"The ability to use an image with the software built into it, rather than just the software, is beneficial."

More Docker pros

"The service overview is definitely the most valuable feature. With it, I can see all the services and see if they're healthy or not without having to go specifically into each workflow individually. It has been immensely helpful for us whenever we've had network issues or other such issues. We've been able to use Komodor and see at a glance where there might be potential issues."

"Komodor's multi-cluster centralized event timeline is the most valuable feature."

"The more time we use Komodor the more we save. Currently, we have seen around a ten percent return on investment."

"The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly check what's happening or what has happened."

"The event timeline has been super helpful, enabling us to overlay node events in the same timeline as deployment events... That helps an engineer very quickly troubleshoot without having to do too much digging."

Cons

"If you install Docker on a host, it creates its own firewalls. It can become an issue. Usually, when you want to install Docker, you need to restart the firewall or restart the active tables on the machine, but this is not the case with Kubernetes. It uses the default set up by the next administrator, but with Docker, you have to restart the firewall and restart Docker before the firewall on the system will be okay. If you do not the rules will not be created."

"The product does not have an extensive documentation. The tool does not have good scenarios. We have to go through the GitHub repository and investigate similar scenarios. Also, if you are copying multiple things, then you can jeopardize the copy number. The copying aspect also lacks a UI part. We also need to limit the memory."

"In terms of communication between services, perhaps the configuration within networks between containers could be improved."

"There are elements of stability that are problematic. One of the most recent upgrades created a major incident on our cloud, whereby the containers were not restarting automatically."

"Docker needs to improve its pricing."

"Docker could improve by having more advanced features."

"We'd like knowledge transfer to be easier."

"The documentation could be improved."

More Docker cons

"I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development."

"I would like to see improvements in how the product is installed. We've already communicated these things directly to Komodor. One feature we would like to see is for Komodor to be highly available on the clusters. Currently, it's only able to run in one instance within the cluster."

"Komodor's visibility could be improved."

"One thing we don't have visibility into, which I would love to have, is metrics, such as user logins and usage. It's really hard to know what people are doing when I don't have any metrics on that directly."

"I like the alerts that Komodor provides, but I think the alert interface could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."

"I use the solution's open-source version."

"Docker is a free tool."

"Pricing is based on the number of users."

"Docker is a free-to-use solution. However, Docker Enterprise is not free."

"The solution is an open-source technology and not a commercial product. However, you will have to pay sometimes. The tool's pricing depends on the vendor."

"I would rate the pricing of Docker as ten out of ten"

"The pricing of the solution is fairly cheap."

More Docker pricing and cost advice

"Other options pop up, but Komodor's pricing works well for our use case. It's fair, and we appreciate it. A lot of other vendors price their solutions in a way that would cost us disproportionately more money than they should. Komodor's pricing is reasonable in the way they calculate usage and value."

"We pay according to the number of resources we have; if we are a small start-up, we have fewer resources and thus pay less."

"As far as I can recall, the licensing cost was fair."

"The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher end. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, Komodor is a seven."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Insurance Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Wellness & Fitness Company

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Docker?

We are using Docker to host applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Docker?

I consider Docker's pricing to be affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Docker?

In terms of communication between services, perhaps the configuration within networks between containers could be improved.

See all answers

What do you like most about Komodor?

The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Komodor?

The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Komodor?

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Docker

Compared 29% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Docker

Compared 14% of the time

Codespaces vs Docker

Compared 13% of the time

Mirantis Container Runtime vs Docker

Compared 13% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Docker

Compared 8% of the time

More Docker Competitors

Portainer vs Komodor

Compared 82% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Komodor

Compared 15% of the time

Kubernetes vs Komodor

Compared 3% of the time

More Komodor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Docker

April 2025

Download Docker product report

Buyer's Guide

Komodor

April 2025

Download Komodor product report

Overview

Docker is a versatile container platform used for running and deploying applications in isolated environments, ensuring consistency across development, testing, and production.

Docker offers solutions for containerizing applications, automating deployments, and managing infrastructure through its robust platform. It supports CI/CD workflows, provides a development platform for container management, and simplifies the setup by using streamlined tools. Organizations leverage Docker for building microservices, running UI applications, deploying web services, and setting up secure environments. It also facilitates managing containers via Kubernetes and creating development stacks for enhanced productivity.

What are Docker's key features?

Security: Offers containment and isolation of applications.
Easy Use: Simplifies the deployment and management of applications.
Documentation: Extensive resources to aid in understanding and implementation.
Customization: Flexible environment configurations.
Scalability: Efficiently handles applications irrespective of scale.
Internal DNS: Manages network configurations within the container ecosystem.
Overlay Networks: Facilitates seamless inter-container communication.
Resource Efficiency: Optimizes usage of system resources.

What benefits should users look for?

Consistency: Ensures homogeneous environments across development, testing, and production stages.
Portability: Allows applications to run consistently on any platform.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces overhead costs associated with application deployment.
Speed: Accelerates the build, test, and deployment cycles.
Flexibility: Supports various tools and integrations to adapt to different workflows.

Industries implement Docker for CI/CD pipelines, scaling services, and improving resource utilization. Tech companies use Docker for building and deploying their software in isolated environments. Finance and healthcare sectors deploy applications securely, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards. Educational institutions set up consistent development environments for coding labs and training students in advanced technologies.

Docker

Komodor is the missing piece in your DevOps toolchain - offering one unified platform from which you can gain a deep understanding of all of your system events and changes. We integrate with all of your tools, monitor changes and alerts and organize information on a clear digestible dashboard and provide you with the right context at the right time.

Free Report: Docker vs. Komodor

Find out what your peers are saying about Docker vs. Komodor and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Docker vs. Komodor report.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.