Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs Pandora FMS comparison

NETMONASTERY and Pandora FMS are both solutions in the Log Management category. NETMONASTERY is ranked #53, while Pandora FMS is ranked #37 with an average rating of 8.0. NETMONASTERY holds a 0.2% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Pandora FMS’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of NETMONASTERY users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pandora FMS users who would recommend it.
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Read 8 DNIF HYPERCLOUD reviews
  • 519 Views
  • 133 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
Pandora FMS
Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews
  • 269 Views
  • 26 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Pandora FMS and DNIF HYPERCLOUD are competitive products in the network and systems monitoring solutions category. Based on user reviews, Pandora FMS seems to have the upper hand in terms of cost-effectiveness and support, while DNIF HYPERCLOUD is favored for its advanced features that provide added value for those willing to invest more.

Features: Pandora FMS is noted for its extensive monitoring capabilities, flexible module integration, and comprehensive setup that suits broad monitoring needs. DNIF HYPERCLOUD stands out with its superior analytics capabilities, real-time threat detection, and specialized focus on security intelligence, appealing to users prioritizing security measures.

Room for Improvement: Pandora FMS has room for improvement in reporting capabilities, automated functionalities, and a refined approach to automation. DNIF HYPERCLOUD could improve its scalability, integration with third-party tools, and enhance its scalability features to better meet user needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pandora FMS is described as having a straightforward deployment process with efficient customer support. DNIF HYPERCLOUD may require a more complex setup process, but users report satisfaction with the robust support that mitigates the steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: Pandora FMS is highlighted as a cost-effective solution offering good return on investment relative to its setup costs, making it appealing to budget-conscious buyers. DNIF HYPERCLOUD, though potentially more expensive upfront, is perceived to deliver significant long-term value, resonating with users seeking comprehensive functionality worth its cost.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Pandora FMS Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Pandora FMS
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 856,807 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Ranking in Log Management
53rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (54th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (23rd), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (29th)
Pandora FMS
Ranking in Log Management
37th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (42nd), Server Monitoring (17th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (42nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (28th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of DNIF HYPERCLOUD is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

Kishore Tiwari - PeerSpot reviewer
Development from open sources is very valuable but a huge infrastructure is required
The solution's command line should be simpler so that routine commands can be used. The search configuration is a bit different than other OEMs or SIEM solutions like ArcSight or QRadar that are easy to search because they operate similarly. The logic is there and the solution supplies a pretty good explanation. Basically, DNIF spelled out is the opposite of FIND. You have to find commands whenever you want to search something. For example, a highway gets you to your destination but there is an alternate way people don't yet know about. Gartner or Forrester haven't yet studied it. We were a bit nervous when we were trying to get familiar with the solution. We wondered if we could realize ROI because the commands and ways of pulling data were different to us. We raised a case with the support team and their professionals provided the needed support. The command line is user friendly once you understand it. If you need immediate use, then you might want to get assistance from someone who is well-versed in methods for using key patterns to find things. Lengthier files for threat hunting or analysis are needed. The correlation happens, but exporting a large number of files to abstract them is not possible. For example, I want to present raw data to management so I should be able to customize a date range in my query and download the files.
Read full review
Gabriel Glusgold - PeerSpot reviewer
Personalized metrics; simplicity of data
My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring This solution has helped us improve our organization by allowing us to create a lot of metrics on several platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. We then use these Pandora metrics to create an interface. We then pass the interface off to the…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Has a great search capability."
"Great for scaling productivity for log monitoring purposes."
"The beauty of the solution is that you can develop infrastructure for a data lake using open sources that are separate from the licenses."
"The response time on queries is super-fast."
"The User Behavior Analytics is a built-in threat-hunting feature. It detects and reports on any kind of malware or ransomware that enters the network."
"I like the MITRE table, a feature I saw for the first time in the same solution. There was one MITRE tactic table, which can be used to identify threats if you have all kinds of rules enabled or if you have rules for all the tactics in the MITRE table. There are 14 tables in MITRE, and those 14 tables consist of multiple columns, tactics, and techniques. It was one of the first SIEM tools I saw that had that particular MITRE table. On that basis, you can create new rules and identify existing ones. At any point, if an alert is triggered, it will try to match it to any of those MITRE tactics. I liked that creating a workbook on MITRE business was straightforward. I also like that you can search using SQL or DQL."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of EPS it can handle."
"The dashboard is helpful, and it creates visualizations to let staff review event data and identify patterns and anomalies."
More DNIF HYPERCLOUD pros
"Pandora FMS provides us with a general report (graphical) about all of the connected devices, which helps with planning new stations and tracking them."
"It provides us with proactive monitoring and is very easy to configure and maintain."
"This product has allowed us to identify and correct certain issues that were affecting our solution."
"You can configure several types of architecture for high availability or load balancing."
"Pandora's architecture is interesting. It's open so you can easily extend and enhance it. It's simpler to customize Pandora compared to other solutions. It's also scalable enough to support large environments."
"The solution has good dashboards and graphics."
"Thanks to this software and to the work of the support team, we have everything under control."
"This solution has screens that are easy to understand and provide a wealth of information."
More Pandora FMS pros
 

Cons

"There are currently some issues with machine learning plug-ins."
"The solution should be able to connect to endpoints, such as desktops and laptops... If this solution had a smart connector to these logs- Windows, Linux, or any other logs - without affecting the performance of the connector, that would be wonderful."
"I feel that DNIF needs to invest more in marketing, considering that it operates at a very competitive speed."
"The vendor is fairly new and it's not as big as some of the international competitors. It's not a mature product. If you ask them to move data, it might take a lot of time."
"The solution's command line should be simpler so that routine commands can be used."
"I think DNIF HYPERCLOUD can implement the ability to export more than 100,000. At the moment, we can't go beyond that. So many times, if you're checking for the firewall logs and working on something related to authentication or network-related traffic, while that log count is low, the account goes beyond that. You can't restrict the logs or the amount of data you can export. It's very important for my situation. It would be better if they could increase the capacity of exports. Although there are many more types of searching in DNIF HYPERCLOUD, people still struggle to query out what they want because not everyone is good at SQL or DQL. The easiest way to query out in DNIF is using the GUI-based interface. But in the GUI interface, you can use operator calls. It gets tricky when you want to search for a specific type of event. You don't know where it will be passed and whether it will be consistent. In the initial phase, it's tough for us to use DNIF. You cannot pass every event in a stable DNIF. When we used that particular tool, we used to get those logs, but sometimes many things are not getting passed. So, we used to export the sheet or export the data into Excel and weigh the required details. In the next release, I would like them to improve the export of the columns and make the application more user-friendly. I would also like a threat-hunting feature in the next release."
"Dependency on the DNIF support team was frustrating."
"The EBA could be improved."
"Pandora FMS is relatively new, and the interface with the older version crashes at times. We have several different operating systems, such as Linux and Windows, and Pandora does not run as well in these."
"This solution requires proper training to get 100% out of it."
"Improvements are needed for server and network discovery, including service-based discovery."
"We would like to see improvement in the mainframe integration that this solution is capable of."
"I sincerely believe that Pandora needs new ideas for functionality closer to advanced device security monitoring."
"I think some improvements to the Android app would be good."
"When it comes to the definition of local Software Agents for the first time in the open-source version, it can become very tedious."
"A nice feature in the next release would be an automation module to run workflow actions."
More Pandora FMS cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is based on the log size."
"Price-wise, the product is quite economical. I rate the solution's price as three or four on a scale of one to ten, where one is considered to be a very economically priced tool."
"The solution requires a huge infrastructure and that is costly."
"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."
"They are very competitive on the pricing side. That's one reason why my manager keeps using it."
"Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive."
"Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."
"The Open Source Community Edition is great to just explore the software, or use it on medium-sized infrastructures."
"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."
"You get the license and it includes updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of modules."
"In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."
More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
856,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Real Estate/Law Firm
10%
Educational Organization
9%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
9%
Media Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with DNIF HYPERCLOUD?
A lot of people don't know about DNIF HYPERCLOUD, but they do know about products like Splunk, QRadar, ArcSight, and some other SIEM solutions. DNIF is not a known name in the market. From an impro...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for DNIF HYPERCLOUD?
DNIF HYPERCLOUD is a good SIEM solution. One of the tools' features is very high scalability in terms of the events generated per second. The product is aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework....
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering DNIF HYPERCLOUD?
The tool's ability in the area of its analytic capabilities has enhanced our company's security poster in a good way, especially when compared to some of the other competitors in the market, like S...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Compared 26% of the time
LogRhythm SIEM vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
LogRhythm SIEM vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Compared 19% of the time
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Compared 19% of the time
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Compared 19% of the time
Wazuh vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
Wazuh vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Compared 16% of the time
More DNIF HYPERCLOUD Competitors
Zabbix vs Pandora FMS Logo
Zabbix vs Pandora FMS
Compared 28% of the time
Wazuh vs Pandora FMS Logo
Wazuh vs Pandora FMS
Compared 19% of the time
LibreNMS vs Pandora FMS Logo
LibreNMS vs Pandora FMS
Compared 14% of the time
Centreon vs Pandora FMS Logo
Centreon vs Pandora FMS
Compared 6% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs Pandora FMS Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Pandora FMS
Compared 6% of the time
More Pandora FMS Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
June 2025
DNIF HYPERCLOUD reportDownload DNIF HYPERCLOUD product report
Buyer's Guide
Pandora FMS
May 2025
Pandora FMS reportDownload Pandora FMS product report
 

Overview

DNIF HYPERCLOUD is a cloud native platform that brings the functionality of SIEM, UEBA and SOAR into a single continuous workflow to solve cybersecurity challenges at scale. DNIF HYPERCLOUD is the flagship SaaS platform from NETMONASTERY that delivers key detection functionality using big data analytics and machine learning. NETMONASTERY aims to deliver a platform that helps customers in ingesting machine data and automatically identify anomalies in these data streams using machine learning and outlier detection algorithms. The objective is to make it easy for untrained engineers and analysts to use the platform and extract benefit reliably and efficiently.

NETMONASTERY

Pandora FMS is a monitoring as a service (MaaS) solution that is ideal for companies with at least 100 or more devices. Instead of multiple, difficult-to-integrate monitoring systems, Pandora FMS is an all-in-one solution that is easy to use. The software is able to untangle complicated technology infrastructures to easily identify the root cause of issues in order to find the most efficient solution. It does so by analyzing everything in your system, from databases and applications to services and desktops, as well as communications.

Pandora FMS Features

Pandora FMS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

  • Application Monitoring (APM)
  • IoT monitoring
  • Log collection
  • Inventory
  • Issue management / ITSM
  • Mainframe monitoring
  • Network monitoring
  • Remote control
  • Synthetic monitoring
  • Service oriented monitoring
  • Server monitoring
  • User experience monitoring
  • Virtualization & cloud

Pandora FMS Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Pandora FMS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

  • Comprehensive overview: Pandora FMS provides a comprehensive overview of your system to make troubleshooting easy. It also provides all the tools to monitor and analyze an extensive range of data, from traffic to connectivity.
  • Easy forecasting: With Pandora FMS, you can use your network diagram for forecasting solutions, which gives you the necessary info you need to perform maintenance. 
  • Proactive solutions: Issues are proactively addressed. Pandora FMS provides alerts 24/7 so you can deal with problems before they grow even bigger. This also helps your organization eliminate any down time. 
  • Solve future problems: Another benefit of implementing Pandora FMS is that it enables you to optimize your services to ensure that future issues are minimized. In addition, they offer around-the-clock monitoring and automated solutions. As a result, the solution enables you to operate your organization with maximum efficiency all the time, saving you money and time. 
  • Personalized service maps: Pandora FMS allows you to create detailed, personalized service maps that can help you identify any shortcomings in your system and address them as soon as possible. 
  • SLA and availability reports: With Pandora FMS, you receive critical alerts when SLA levels aren’t met, which also helps you understand when your applications and systems are not meeting your business goals.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Pandora FMS solution.

PeerSpot user Marc C., Systems Analyst at a university, says, "It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. It is really flexible. It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

Another reviewer, Alexandre J., comments, “What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it. The speed of locating problems and to be able to solve them quickly, so that it affects our client's network infrastructure as little as possible, is very valuable.

Thanks to Pandora FMS we have everything unified in the same point and it is highly efficient.”

Pandora FMS
 

Sample Customers

Mahindra & Mahindra, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), ICICI Bank, Yes Bank, Tata Motors, RBL Bank
Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes
Buyer's Guide
DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Pandora FMS
June 2025
Free Report: DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Pandora FMS
Find out what your peers are saying about DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Pandora FMS and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
856,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Pandora FMS report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.