Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs Testim comparison

Digital.ai and Testim are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Digital.ai is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0, while Testim is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.7. Digital.ai holds a 0.4% mindshare in TAt, compared to Testim’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Digital.ai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Testim users who would recommend it.
Digital.ai Continuous Testing
Read 3 Digital.ai Continuous Testing reviews
  • 291 Views
  • 20 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
Testim
Read 10 Testim reviews
  • 2,950 Views
  • 633 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Digital.ai Continuous Testing and Testim are products in the software testing automation category. Testim offers advanced AI-driven automation features, which give it a technological edge despite higher initial costs compared to Digital.ai Continuous Testing.

Features: Digital.ai Continuous Testing supports a wide range of applications across different environments and emphasizes broad compatibility. It integrates seamlessly with existing systems. Testim provides AI-powered test creation and maintenance, significantly reducing manual testing efforts and enhancing test automation accuracy.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital.ai Continuous Testing allows seamless integration with existing test environments and is backed by comprehensive customer service for straightforward deployment. Testim, while requiring a more complex setup and a steeper learning curve, offers substantial support after deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Digital.ai Continuous Testing has a lower setup cost, appealing to companies seeking immediate affordability. Testim's initial investment is higher but offers high ROI through its AI-driven features that enhance long-term productivity and may reduce maintenance expenses over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Testim Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Testim
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Continuous Testing
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
21st
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Testing Tools (8th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd)
Testim
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
7th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Continuous Testing is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 5.6%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Alan Chiou - PeerSpot reviewer
Has Mobile Studio feature which can generate scripts
The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version.
Read full review
Dheeraj Bavirisetty - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing automation skills, intuitive, and low-code
We use Testim to automate our testing scripts. I am part of the testing team for a corporate bank in the US, which is my client. We work on building their product, and Testim is used to automate the scripts since it is a low-code automation platform The feature I like most about Testim is the…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most useful feature for me is Mobile Studio. It has a UI where I can click on elements, and it generates a script for me. Mobile Studio can generate code from testing steps. I'm using Python with it."
"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."
"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."
"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."
"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."
"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."
"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."
"The product is easy to use."
"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."
"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."
More Testim pros
 

Cons

"The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version."
"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."
"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."
"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."
"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."
"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."
"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."
"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."
"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."
"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."
"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."
More Testim cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support."
"It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."
"The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker."
"The solution is not expensive."
"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."
"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
20%
Retailer
10%
Insurance Company
9%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Healthcare Company
7%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?
The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Digital.ai Continuous Testing?
The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?
I'm using Digital.ai Continuous Testing to create and test a mobile application. We're developing and testing a mobile app.
See all answers
What do you like most about Testim?
The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?
I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Testim?
More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing Logo
BrowserStack vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing
Compared 65% of the time
Perfecto vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing Logo
Perfecto vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing
Compared 35% of the time
More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Competitors
Tricentis Tosca vs Testim Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Testim
Compared 46% of the time
Katalon Studio vs Testim Logo
Katalon Studio vs Testim
Compared 21% of the time
Functionize vs Testim Logo
Functionize vs Testim
Compared 14% of the time
Testsigma vs Testim Logo
Testsigma vs Testim
Compared 7% of the time
Applitools vs Testim Logo
Applitools vs Testim
Compared 4% of the time
More Testim Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ConformIQ Creator vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing
April 2025
Digital.ai Continuous Testing reportDownload Digital.ai Continuous Testing product report
Buyer's Guide
Testim
May 2025
Testim reportDownload Testim product report
 

Also Known As

Experitest Seetest, Experitest
No data available
 

Overview

Experitest's continuous testing solutions enable enterprises to reduce risk and provide their customers satisfying, error-free experiences across all devices and browsers. They seamlessly integrate with best-in-class tools throughout the DevOps pipeline allowing organizations to rapidly deliver highly protected, quality applications at-speed and at-scale.

Digital.ai

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Testim
 

Sample Customers

Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee
Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality
Buyer's Guide
Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Testim
April 2025
Free Report: Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Testim
Find out what your peers are saying about Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Testim and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Testim report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.