Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs Testim comparison

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Read 10 Testim reviews

2,938 Views
2,850 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Digital.ai Continuous Testing and Testim are products in the software testing automation category. Testim offers advanced AI-driven automation features, which give it a technological edge despite higher initial costs compared to Digital.ai Continuous Testing.

Features: Digital.ai Continuous Testing supports a wide range of applications across different environments and emphasizes broad compatibility. It integrates seamlessly with existing systems. Testim provides AI-powered test creation and maintenance, significantly reducing manual testing efforts and enhancing test automation accuracy.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital.ai Continuous Testing allows seamless integration with existing test environments and is backed by comprehensive customer service for straightforward deployment. Testim, while requiring a more complex setup and a steeper learning curve, offers substantial support after deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Digital.ai Continuous Testing has a lower setup cost, appealing to companies seeking immediate affordability. Testim's initial investment is higher but offers high ROI through its AI-driven features that enhance long-term productivity and may reduce maintenance expenses over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Testim Report (Updated: July 2025).

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Testim

Download the complete report

Helped 864,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

19th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (8th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (3rd)

Testim

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Continuous Testing is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 5.7%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Alan Chiou

PM at Galaxy Software Services

Has Mobile Studio feature which can generate scripts

The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version.

Read full review

Dheeraj Bavirisetty

Senior Consultant at Eviden France

Enhancing automation skills, intuitive, and low-code

We use Testim to automate our testing scripts. I am part of the testing team for a corporate bank in the US, which is my client. We work on building their product, and Testim is used to automate the scripts since it is a low-code automation platform The feature I like most about Testim is the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."

"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."

"The most useful feature for me is Mobile Studio. It has a UI where I can click on elements, and it generates a script for me. Mobile Studio can generate code from testing steps. I'm using Python with it."

"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."

More Testim pros

Cons

"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."

"The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version."

"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support."

"It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."

"The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"The solution is not expensive."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Insurance Company

10%

Retailer

10%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker.

What needs improvement with Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

I'm using Digital.ai Continuous Testing to create and test a mobile application. We're developing and testing a mobile app.

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

BrowserStack vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Comparisons

Compared 38% of the time

TestObject vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 34% of the time

Perfecto vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 17% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 11% of the time

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 43% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 21% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 15% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

ConformIQ Creator vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Download Digital.ai Continuous Testing product report

Download Testim product report

Also Known As

Experitest Seetest, Experitest

No data available

Overview

Experitest's continuous testing solutions enable enterprises to reduce risk and provide their customers satisfying, error-free experiences across all devices and browsers. They seamlessly integrate with best-in-class tools throughout the DevOps pipeline allowing organizations to rapidly deliver highly protected, quality applications at-speed and at-scale.

Digital.ai

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Sample Customers

Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Testim