Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell RecoverPoint vs Hitachi Thin Image Advanced comparison

Dell Technologies and Hitachi Vantara are both solutions in the Data Replication category. Dell Technologies is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while Hitachi Vantara is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. Dell Technologies holds a 2.4% mindshare in DR, compared to Hitachi Vantara’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hitachi Vantara users who would recommend it.
Dell RecoverPoint
Read 22 Dell RecoverPoint reviews
  • 303 Views
  • 99 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Hitachi Thin Image Advanced
Read 2 Hitachi Thin Image Advanced reviews
  • 663 Views
  • 354 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Dell RecoverPoint and Hitachi Thin Image Advanced compete in data protection and storage management. Dell appears to have better pricing and support, while Hitachi is preferred for its robust features.

Features: Dell RecoverPoint offers data replication, recovery capabilities, and disaster recovery solutions. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced provides efficient space usage, faster data access, and management. Dell focuses on recovery efficiency, whereas Hitachi emphasizes storage optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell RecoverPoint is known for straightforward deployment and reliable support. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced requires a more complex setup with detailed documentation and technical assistance. Dell holds an advantage in deployment, while Hitachi is strong in customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Dell RecoverPoint has a cost-effective initial setup and competitive pricing. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced has higher upfront costs but offers long-term value with its advanced features. The cost-benefit balance makes Hitachi a favorable choice for feature-focused returns.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Dell RecoverPoint vs. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Dell RecoverPoint vs. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell RecoverPoint
Ranking in Data Replication
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Hitachi Thin Image Advanced
Ranking in Data Replication
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of Dell RecoverPoint is 2.4%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hitachi Thin Image Advanced is 8.6%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Replication
 

Featured Reviews

Syed Shahid Hasan - PeerSpot reviewer
Snapshots allow you to restore or view the image on either the DR or production side if data is compromised and integrate seamlessly with Dell EMC storage
I've worked closely with Dell since 2007. Back then, we could create a "Severity 1" case. I think they've discontinued that option. Now, you can create a "Severity 2" case. For Severity 1 issues, you can call the helpline. I've often recommended to Dell EMC Pakistan that there should be a portal option to create Severity 1 cases. Their engineers are good, but since COVID, many experienced engineers have left the company. This is a problem for every vendor, not just Dell EMC – they face challenges finding experienced technical engineers. So, while I recommend Dell EMC, sometimes they don't have the technical staff for very quick responses. In those cases, you might need to engage your account manager to find the best engineer on a Severity 1 issue.
Read full review
BP
Fast data transfer and quick setup for new servers
We use Thin Image to image new test servers, create new development servers, and test new servers. It is also used for fast data transfer to new servers Hitachi Thin Image allows us to quickly create new data snapshots. It speeds up synchronization and setup tasks significantly, which is…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is now Flash-based, which is better. they moved away from Java."
"RecoverPoint's most valuable feature is the automatic failover."
"We use RecoverPoint for disaster recovery and asynchronous replication, and we use the application at a block level, not the software level. This has been tested, and it's very durable."
"The most valuable features include the ease of defining contingency groups and the drag-and-drop functionality, which speeds up our application processes."
"The technical support for Dell RecoverPoint is excellent."
"It has improved RTO and RPO."
"In terms of operational and financial benefits, in case of any disaster, it can recover."
"It excels in duplicating data between two distinct types of storage systems."
More Dell RecoverPoint pros
"The most beneficial feature is its fast data transfer capabilities."
"Hitachi Thin Image is stable."
 

Cons

"The initial setup is complex."
"The support is horrible."
"Integration with VMware is the only thing we need to improve. Another feature I'd like to see is the ability to convert management to HTML. And the integration should also be done on the same level."
"Considering the speed Dell RecoverPoint can recover data, it would be good if we could replicate data from on-premise to the cloud with this solution."
"In the future, I would like Dell RecoverPoint to evolve as an orchestration tool that can integrate with other replication tools such as Microsoft native replication and Oracle Data Guard."
"Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get the benefits of this solution."
"I am waiting for block replication with VirtualBox."
"The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market."
More Dell RecoverPoint cons
"We are having problems with the speed of synchronization and transferring of data."
"Hitachi needs to improve their management software, especially the Ops Center."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is considered quite costly."
"While I recommend Dell EMC, it depends on your specific use case. Licensing is perpetual, meaning you buy it once."
"The product is fairly priced."
"RecoverPoint came free as an add-on to the PowerProtect Data Manager backup software from Dell EMC."
"The price is moderate."
"Support is an additional subscription."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
32%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Healthcare Company
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Computer Software Company
34%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Educational Organization
7%
Import And Exporter
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication?
The image backup feature is great. For example, if you set the journal to take a backup every ten minutes, it will create a snapshot or pointer every ten minutes for as long as you need.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication?
The price of Dell RecoverPoint is a bit higher because of the presence of multiple Chinese solutions in the market. Although the cost is higher, the recovery process is easier with Dell RecoverPoin...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication?
Dell RecoverPoint can be improved by virtualizing it, which would use less storage and enhance performance. The current requirement for physical storage is a limitation because it demands more stor...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Hitachi Thin Image?
Hitachi needs to improve their management software, especially the Ops Center. Better management could enhance the overall experience.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Hitachi Thin Image?
We use Thin Image to image new test servers, create new development servers, and test new servers. It is also used for fast data transfer to new servers.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Hitachi Thin Image?
Thin Image is suitable for both small and big companies. It is highly recommended for its fast performance. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dell AppSync vs Dell RecoverPoint Logo
Dell AppSync vs Dell RecoverPoint
Compared 61% of the time
NetApp Snapshot vs Dell RecoverPoint Logo
NetApp Snapshot vs Dell RecoverPoint
Compared 39% of the time
More Dell RecoverPoint Competitors
NetApp Snapshot vs Hitachi Thin Image Advanced Logo
NetApp Snapshot vs Hitachi Thin Image Advanced
Compared 63% of the time
Hitachi ShadowImage vs Hitachi Thin Image Advanced Logo
Hitachi ShadowImage vs Hitachi Thin Image Advanced
Compared 37% of the time
More Hitachi Thin Image Advanced Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Dell RecoverPoint
April 2025
Dell RecoverPoint reportDownload Dell RecoverPoint product report
Buyer's Guide
Data Replication
March 2025
Hitachi Thin Image Advanced reportDownload Hitachi Thin Image Advanced product report
 

Also Known As

RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication
Hitachi Thin Image
 

Overview

Dell RecoverPoint provides continuous data protection with multiple recovery points to restore applications instantly to a specific point in time. It is used to protect applications with bidirectional synchronous and asynchronous replication and digital video recorder (DVR)-like recovery in physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures.

Dell Technologies

Nondisruptively copy data within any Hitachi storage system or virtualized storage pool. Hitachi Thin Image snapshot software quickly creates copies for immediate use in decision support, software development and modern data protection operations.

Hitachi Vantara
 

Sample Customers

Regis Aged Care, Cap Atlantique, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Major Boutique Hotel Chain, Riverside Health System, Panduit
Net Credit Financial Group
Buyer's Guide
Dell RecoverPoint vs. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced
April 2025
Free Report: Dell RecoverPoint vs. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell RecoverPoint vs. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Dell RecoverPoint vs. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced report.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.