We performed a comparison between Dell RecoverPoint and Hitachi Thin Image Advanced based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication."The solution is very stable. Once it's installed, many customers forget they even have it."
"The solution provides continuous data protection."
"The product does block-level replication very well."
"It has improved RTO and RPO."
"When it works, it is the best product that is available."
"RecoverPoint's most valuable feature is the automatic failover."
"We use RecoverPoint for disaster recovery and asynchronous replication, and we use the application at a block level, not the software level. This has been tested, and it's very durable."
"It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss."
"Hitachi Thin Image is stable."
"Integration with VMware is the only thing we need to improve. Another feature I'd like to see is the ability to convert management to HTML. And the integration should also be done on the same level."
"RecoverPoint's WAN optimization could be improved."
"It is worth mentioning that this solution is no longer supported, primarily because it doesn't replicate between two different storage systems anymore."
"RecoverPoint is designed to integrate seamlessly with Dell EMC storage. If you don't have Dell EMC storage, you can't use it with other brands like IBM or HP."
"Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get the benefits of this solution."
"The support is horrible."
"Considering the speed Dell RecoverPoint can recover data, it would be good if we could replicate data from on-premise to the cloud with this solution."
"I am waiting for block replication with VirtualBox."
"We are having problems with the speed of synchronization and transferring of data."
Dell RecoverPoint is ranked 4th in Data Replication with 18 reviews while Hitachi Thin Image Advanced is ranked 5th in Data Replication with 1 review. Dell RecoverPoint is rated 8.6, while Hitachi Thin Image Advanced is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dell RecoverPoint writes "Ensuring data resilience and business continuity in disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hitachi Thin Image Advanced writes "Direct contact with technical support was good, stability is evident, with defined scalability". Dell RecoverPoint is most compared with Dell AppSync, whereas Hitachi Thin Image Advanced is most compared with NetApp Snapshot and Hitachi ShadowImage.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
