No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Deepwatch vs SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 9, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Deepwatch
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (24th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (13th)
SentinelOne Wayfinder Threa...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
AI Security Services (73rd)
 

Featured Reviews

Shivam Dhang - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Infrastructure & Cloud Manager at Softcell Technologies Limited
Continuous monitoring has improved threat detection and reduces incident response time
Deepwatch could improve with more granular customization of detection rules and alert tuning to better fit specific cloud workloads and use cases. Additionally, it can be improved by enhancing the dashboarding. It should also support deeper cloud-native integrations such as AWS, Azure, and GCP, which would further improve operational efficiency and control. Regarding the support, I would say that the support team should be more responsive because ideally, the response time of the support is quite long, which is sometimes frustrating. However, I do agree that for easy issues, they respond within the expected time, but for complex issues, they do take time to respond.
Prathamesh Samant - PeerSpot reviewer
Presales Manager at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees
Effective integration and threat hunting capabilities boost operational ease, but interface improvements are needed
I would like to improve the dashboard in SentinelOne Singularity MDR, as it could be much better, along with the reporting structure. The granularity of policies and ease of policy management from the console could be made better, while my experience from a feature standpoint has been good overall. Regarding summary reports provided from SentinelOne Singularity MDR, I find the reporting structure could be much better in terms of granularity. Additionally, for C-suite executives, there can be more non-technical content that provides a bird's eye view of organizational risk posture, rather than just detailed technical analyses. This high-level perspective on the organization's risk would be highly beneficial at the management level.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"With Deepwatch, I have seen a 40 to 50% reduction in MTTR due to faster detection and guided response playbooks, and false positives have also dropped significantly by 40 to 50% through better correlation and risk scoring, which significantly reduced SOC workload and improved analyst efficiency."
"SentinelOne has a rollback feature that has helped them gain popularity in the market. No other competitors of the solution including Cisco, Fortinet, or Cortex XDR have this feature. SentinelOne is a kernel-independent solution. We don’t need to check the kernel dependency on the Linux platform. They also commit to a 100 percent recovery from ransomware attacks. The solution has rollback features for ransomware on Windows."
"I have seen benefits from using it, and I can assure that it is 100% protected against many threats, and it is always in the actual state."
"My advice to others is this is a solid product."
"The endpoint security software is great."
"The most valuable feature is that it works and is reliable."
"The SentinelOne Active EDR is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance, which is very important for us in our company."
"The initial setup process was straightforward, and deployment can take approximately half a day, depending on the company's size."
 

Cons

"Regarding the support, I would say that the support team should be more responsive because ideally, the response time of the support is quite long, which is sometimes frustrating."
"The only thing I'm not sure about is I haven't deployed it on any mobile devices."
"SentinelOne Vigilance doesn't have a direct connection with MSPs."
"The toughest challenge that customers find is with the deployment and tuning of the product; getting it tuned properly takes some time, so that's a challenge."
"SentinelOne Vigilance's integration capabilities with other products can be considered as an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The process to replicate exclusions is not user-friendly."
"The integration with Microsoft 365 for SentinelOne Singularity MDR isn't quite as effective as with Field Effect."
"Regarding disadvantages of SentinelOne Vigilance, there is no local hub server that I can use to download the updates and signatures only once."
"My customers who use the tool mostly want a summary of the monitoring activities of the product in a report form...t can be useful for our customers to identify the threats and incidents encountered by the product."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The licensing cost depends on the number of connected devices and whether you purchase additional services."
"I give the cost a three out of ten."
"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten since it is really expensive, but it is well worth what my company gets."
"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten since it is a very highly-priced solution."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The tool's pricing is slightly cheaper than other alternatives. It's not just about licensing costs; because we already have it implemented, we can save money on deployment and initial setup. Additionally, SentinelOne Vigilance is slightly cheaper in licensing, maybe around 10-15 percent cheaper."
"SentinelOne Vigilance is priced in a normal range."
"The solution’s pricing is very reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.
886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
29%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Healthcare Company
8%
Media Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SentinelOne Vigilance?
The best feature of this solution is the third-party management aspect. An external company oversees the tool's management and monitors the data it generates. If the EDR detects suspicious activity...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SentinelOne Vigilance?
The pricing, licensing, and setup costs in general are quite affordable.
What needs improvement with SentinelOne Vigilance?
Regarding disadvantages of SentinelOne Vigilance, there is no local hub server that I can use to download the updates and signatures only once. The solution is fully scalable, although the only poi...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SentinelOne WatchTower, SentinelOne Wayfinder Managed Detection & Response
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Premise Health, Dover, Follett, Genuine Parts Company
Norwegian Airlines, TGI Fridays, AVX, FIMBank
Find out what your peers are saying about Huntress, CrowdStrike, Arctic Wolf Networks and others in Managed Detection and Response (MDR). Updated: April 2026.
886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.