We performed a comparison between Dataloader.io and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."he product’s most valuable feature is ease of access."
"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."
"This is a stable platform and we did not encounter any big problems."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."
"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."
"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."
"Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc."
"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."
"We need help with large data migrations. It only works well for a few thousand records or less than a million records."
"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath."
"The product needs more AI capabilities."
"The interface could be better from a usability standpoint."
"Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular."
"Exception handling needs to be improved."
"Automation with the latest websites is not effective. The support of newer websites developed using new technologies would improve this solution."
Dataloader.io is ranked 39th in Data Integration with 1 review while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Dataloader.io is rated 8.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Dataloader.io writes "Provides an ease of access and an automated mapping feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Dataloader.io is most compared with DBamp, Mule Anypoint Platform and BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.