Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cyren WebSecurity vs Mimecast Web Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cyren WebSecurity
Ranking in Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
42nd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Mimecast Web Security
Ranking in Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
29th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category, the mindshare of Cyren WebSecurity is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mimecast Web Security is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
 

Featured Reviews

JG
The logs and the reports allow me to have an overview of what is going on in my environment
The UI and the logs are a bit old school. I know that there is a plan to change some of those and update them to a newer view which will provide a better look and feel. I requested some changes to move buttons from one place to another so that the platform has more logic.
AshirbadDasmohapatra - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides protection against routine threats like spam, viruses and malware
It’s a straightforward process to set up Mimecast, especially for individuals experienced in email gateway security. The setup is quite effortless. In fact, it's a real-time implementation that can be accomplished within a short span, even as little as thirty to forty minutes. The ease of setup depends on how the user intends to utilize the product. If there is need to make direct DNS changes, there might be a 24-hour implementation time. However, if coordination is established with management or IT personnel, the setup can be performed during non-business hours, such as midnight. Complexity is minimal. While larger organizations often encounter time-consuming procedures, smaller ones can swiftly implement the necessary changes.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Web Gateways (SWG) solutions are best for your needs.
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mimecast Web Security?
Two subscription options are currently offered: monthly and yearly. My suggestion is to opt for the yearly subscription as it can give some discount. The pricing isn't high as other cloud solutions...
What needs improvement with Mimecast Web Security?
Certainly, the primary area needing improvement is Mimecast's customer support. Our experience as Mimecast customers has been less than satisfactory. Even when raising a priority ticket, the respon...
What is your primary use case for Mimecast Web Security?
Mimecast serves as an additional layer for email gateway security and data loss prevention. It also offers email signature management when Google's services fall short. Mimecast allows for uniform ...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sea Mar Community Health Centers, McDonald’s, Mercure Hotels
Aftercare, Growthpoint Properties, Vistaprint, Lodders, Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare, UK bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks and others in Secure Web Gateways (SWG). Updated: July 2025.
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.