Cymulate vs HackerOne comparison

Cymulate and HackerOne are both solutions in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category. Cymulate is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.6, while HackerOne is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3. Cymulate holds a 2.9% mindshare in ASM, compared to HackerOne’s 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cymulate users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of HackerOne users who would recommend it.

Cymulate

Read 6 Cymulate reviews

3,803 Views
647 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HackerOne

Read 5 HackerOne reviews

3,069 Views
1,136 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Cymulate

HackerOne

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

HackerOne and Cymulate compete in the cybersecurity domain. Consumers prefer HackerOne for pricing and support, while Cymulate's robust features and innovation make it a strong contender.

Features: HackerOne supports comprehensive bug bounty programs, offers vulnerability coordination services, and provides third-party integrations. Cymulate delivers automated continuous security validation, advanced attack simulations, and seamless integration with intuitive dashboards.

Room for Improvement: HackerOne could enhance reporting capabilities, improve integration options, and expand its community engagement. Cymulate may benefit from simplifying its complex features, streamlining customer communications, and enhancing network performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HackerOne is praised for its straightforward deployment and quick setup, supported by responsive customer service. Cymulate's deployment requires more complexity due to its simulation features but maintains reliable customer support. Each caters to different implementation needs effectively.

Pricing and ROI: HackerOne offers competitive pricing, appealing to smaller to mid-sized companies with strong ROI. Cymulate's higher initial cost is justified by its comprehensive validation features and significant ROI for enterprises aiming to improve security posture.

To learn more, read our detailed Cymulate vs. HackerOne Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cymulate vs. HackerOne

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cymulate

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (10th), Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (1st), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (2nd)

HackerOne

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

15th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (24th), Vulnerability Management (44th), Bug Bounty Platforms (2nd), Penetration Testing Services (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of Cymulate is 2.9%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HackerOne is 6.6%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Attack Surface Management (ASM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cymulate	2.9%
HackerOne	6.6%
Other	90.5%

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

Featured Reviews

Ondrej Kováč

Solution Engineer at Exclusive Networks Czechia

Advanced cybersecurity solution for attack based vulnerability mng. and upskill platform for SOC.

While Cymulate's technology shows great promise and delivers excellent results, their approach to positioning the solution appears to overlap with other companies like Tenable, making them both direct and indirect competitors. Cymulate must refine their messaging and manage expectations effectively. In my experience, they need to be more attentive internally and mindful of potential negative impacts on customers. They exhibit a high degree of flexibility, which can result in sudden changes without adequate alerting. Communicating with them via phone for business matters can be challenging. On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Cymulate's technology level at eight, but their business level at four out of ten.

Read full review

Faizan Nehal

dApp Auditor at Hacken

Platform supports skill development with effective vulnerability reporting

Everything has become slower on HackerOne. I have noticed that older researchers receive all the private invites while newer ones receive fewer. The same goes for real-life events, where the same people are invited repeatedly. There are no clear guidelines for being invited to programs and conferences, and the process for receiving invitations appears arbitrary.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cymulate is easy to set up, install, and configure."

"With Cymulate, the best features are the capacity to test the EDR or malware, anti-malware solution."

"The security validation feature helps my organization in assessing our security posture."

"The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day."

"The reporting capabilities are very good."

"Cymulate has positively impacted our organization by helping us to take care of the efficacy and reviewing the policies and configuration."

"Apart from getting all the bug bounty opportunities, we also get the chance to practice in a safe environment, like a demo setup. These features are great for beginners who want to explore bug bounties in the future."

"The most valuable feature of HackerOne is its variety of programs. These programs provide depth into various areas, such as mobile, API, and websites."

"HackerOne is larger than WebCloud and has a better reputation than BugCloud, which results in a smoother process."

"It helps me to get new sales, profits, and other benefits."

"HackerOne is larger than WebCloud and has a better reputation than BugCloud, which results in a smoother process."

Cons

"The cost can be quite high, and it impacts scalability as more simulations require additional expenses."

"The product must provide consultancy for initial setup."

"The reporting process requires significant improvement as it often takes longer than expected and the quality is lacking."

"I will be honest, we have it, but in the last year, I didn't maintain the system until a month ago."

"The way Cymulate works for EDR could be improved, as it drops payload and requires action from the EDR console for remediation, which can block the whole process of Cymulate execution."

"We have had some trouble with the agents."

"Response time can be improved. The HackerOne Trust team can be slow to respond sometimes. They're not using AI, which could help reduce the number of duplicate reports."

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne."

"The ability to view the conversation between the triagers and the programs will be really good."

"One issue I've experienced is traffic. Many people try to participate when an opportunity with a bounty of around 1,000-15,000 dollars comes up. In this case, the first person to report the vulnerability gets the bounty. If a second person reports the same vulnerability, they are marked as duplicated instead of receiving some recognition. The second person also invested time finding the issue, so I think this can be improved."

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne. I have noticed that older researchers receive all the private invites while newer ones receive fewer."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is affordable."

"Cymulate's services are expensive."

"The tool is open-source and free for bug bounty hunters."

"The solution is free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	3

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cymulate?

The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cymulate?

I don't currently recall the specific pricing details as I last reviewed them two years ago. I initially thought it would be more expensive, but I found it reasonable because you can purchase modul...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cymulate?

The way Cymulate works for EDR could be improved, as it drops payload and requires action from the EDR console for remediation, which can block the whole process of Cymulate execution. They should ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HackerOne?

The cost is rated as one since there is no need to pay anything, not even a fee or commission.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HackerOne?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HackerOne?

My use case is similar to DuckTron. The processes I use for DuckTron are exactly the same for HackerOne. Therefore, there isn't much of a difference. I use HackerOne for finding vulnerabilities and...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pentera vs Cymulate

Compared 33% of the time

Picus Security vs Cymulate

Compared 21% of the time

XM Cyber vs Cymulate

Compared 13% of the time

AttackIQ vs Cymulate

Compared 6% of the time

SafeBreach vs Cymulate

Compared 6% of the time

More Cymulate Competitors

Bugcrowd vs HackerOne

Compared 47% of the time

Synack vs HackerOne

Compared 15% of the time

Intigriti vs HackerOne

Compared 15% of the time

YesWeHack vs HackerOne

Compared 9% of the time

Cobalt vs HackerOne

Compared 3% of the time

More HackerOne Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cymulate

October 2025

Download Cymulate product report

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne

September 2025

Download HackerOne product report

Also Known As

No data available

HackerOne Assets, HackerOne Pentesting Services, HackerOne Security Assessments, HackerOne Vulnerability Management

Overview

For companies that want to manage their security posture against the evolving threat landscape: Cymulate SaaS-based Extended Security Posture Management (XSPM) deploys within an hour, enabling security professionals to continuously challenge, validate and optimize their cyber-security posture end-to-end across the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The platform provides out-of-the-box, expert and threat intelligence-led risk assessments that are simple to deploy and use for all maturity levels, and constantly updated. It also provides an open framework to create and automate red and purple teaming by generating penetration scenarious and advanced attack campaigns tailored to their unique environments and security politices. Cymulate allowes professionals to manage, know and control their dynamic environment.

Cymulate

HackerOne leads in offensive security with a platform that expertly identifies and remedies security vulnerabilities using AI and a vast researcher community. Trusted by industry giants, it integrates bug bounties, vulnerability disclosure, and code security in software development.

The HackerOne Platform offers a comprehensive suite of services, combining advanced AI technology with the skills of a global security researcher community to address complex security challenges. It facilitates an understanding of vulnerabilities, promoting better remediation practices across software lifecycles. Notable clients include Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and U.S. Department of Defense. Recognized for innovation and workplace excellence, HackerOne continues to set standards in security solutions.

What key features does HackerOne offer?

Skilled Hacker Community: Access a large pool of expert security researchers.
Third-Party Integrations: Seamless compatibility with various tools like payment systems and project management applications.
Bug Bounty Programs: Incentivized vulnerability discovery across industries.
Direct Communication: Facilitates dialogue for better understanding of vulnerabilities.
Safe Practice Environments: Supports learning for both beginners and seasoned professionals.

Why is HackerOne beneficial for your needs?

Speed of Delivery: Quickly identifies and resolves security issues.
Responsive Support: Reliable assistance enhances user experience.
Transparency in Communication: Clear reporting processes aid in issue resolution.
Income Opportunities: Bug bounties offer financial incentives.

HackerOne finds significant applications in various sectors with its focus on vulnerability assessment, testing, and responsible disclosure. Organizations utilize it for ethical hacking and efficient vulnerability coordination, making it essential in cybersecurity strategies. The platform's reliability is evident in its ability to identify and document security threats effectively.

HackerOne

Sample Customers

Euronext, YMCA, Telit, Nemours

Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and the U.S. Department of Defense

Buyer's Guide

Cymulate vs. HackerOne

September 2025

Free Report: Cymulate vs. HackerOne

Find out what your peers are saying about Cymulate vs. HackerOne and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cymulate vs. HackerOne report.

See our list of best Attack Surface Management (ASM) vendors and best Penetration Testing Services vendors.

We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.