Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CylanceOPTICS vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security comparison

BlackBerry and Trend Micro are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. BlackBerry is ranked #42 with an average rating of 7.8, while Trend Micro is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.4. BlackBerry holds a 0.3% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trend Micro’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Trend Micro users who would recommend it.
CylanceOPTICS
Read 11 CylanceOPTICS reviews
  • 456 Views
  • 75 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Trend Vision One Endpoint S...
Read 132 Trend Vision One Endpoint Security reviews
  • 4,648 Views
  • 1,212 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security and CylanceOPTICS compete in the endpoint security space. CylanceOPTICS seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, despite its higher cost.

Features: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers comprehensive protection, and integration capabilities and is known for its superior support. CylanceOPTICS provides advanced threat detection, AI-driven analytics, and a robust and innovative feature set.

Room for Improvement: Users of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security suggest enhancing reporting capabilities, adding more automation features, and seeking more advanced functionalities. CylanceOPTICS users call for better resource usage, improved GUI customization options, and address performance issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is known for straightforward deployment and excellent customer service. CylanceOPTICS users find deployment manageable but report possible delays in customer support response times.

Pricing and ROI: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers competitive pricing, providing good value for money. CylanceOPTICS, although more expensive, justifies its cost with a feature-rich offering and strong ROI, delivering significant long-term value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CylanceOPTICS vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CylanceOPTICS vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CylanceOPTICS
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
42nd
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
4.5
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trend Vision One Endpoint S...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
132
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (5th), Endpoint Compliance (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of CylanceOPTICS is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is 2.0%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

HERNAN RODRIGUEZ - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use
CylanceOPTICS is easy to use.  The product's technical support is slow.  I have been using the product for three years.  CylanceOPTICS is easy to use.  I rate the solution a nine out of ten. 
Read full review
Ágoston DEIM - PeerSpot reviewer
Works wonderfully to defend endpoints against malware, ransomware, and malicious scripts
It would be much easier if the solution added the allowed USB for pen drives and USB drives. You can import an Excel CSV file with 500 devices, but it will be allowed globally. That would be helpful if you want to allow it only in one policy. If you want to enable these pen drives only for one group or an organization's security group, you have to add them manually one by one. That could be easier. It's a user experience, but you can add not just the serial but also the vendor. If you only have a Kingston pen drive, you can say that you want to allow all Kingston, or you can add the model number. If you know that you have a specific model of the Kingston pen drive, you can just allow Kingston and that model. The serial number is not important. You will not filter by serial number. However, if you want to filter by serial number and add only the given devices with the serial number, you have to add them one by one. You have to do this if you don't want to allow them globally. It's enough if you know that you bought a Kingston pen drive and you just put in that you want to allow the Kingston and the model number. Then, all pen drives of the given model will be allowed for a given security group on a given number of computers. In that case, you can attach only pen drives and no external hard drives from Kingston. That could be fast. If you want to add a given serial number, you add it one by one for a specific group. If you want to allow them globally, you say that everybody can use the pen drive on every computer. You can do it from a CSV. Let's say the CSV imports for security groups only and not company-wide. I think this is the more punctual way. If you want to allow it only for the security group or Active Directory group of users, you must manually edit it to limit the serial numbers. The solution's user experience regarding device control could be more friendly or straightforward.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CylanceOPTICS is pretty stable."
"The initial setup was fairly straightforward. To get a large health care organization sorted, we had to create exemptions because some of the scripts and some of the automations were broken."
"Cylance is not a signature-based protection solution and instead works proactively using AI and ML models to patrol for malicious behavior."
"I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. I would give it a close ten as possible because, like SentinelOne, I've seen incompatibility. Whereas Cylance, I've seen none."
"You can use the solution to query certain things."
"The solution has a high level of trust in the industry."
"It automatically blocks the threats, helping us investigate if they harm the environment."
"It's pretty unintrusive"
More CylanceOPTICS pros
"The management console is pretty good. We have a dashboard that shows us what stuff to log, different malicious links that people are trying to access and also if somebody was trying to connect something to the computer, to a USB port or something like that, and if this person is on the under control management. It shows that he tried and he got blocked."
"The web console is quite helpful, as is the visibility view for deployment. Updates do things like Device Control Management, which I can control."
"The product has proven to be very flexible over the years that we have had it."
"The general anti-virus on offer is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"Many features that this solution has, competitors lack. The feature I think is quite good is data loss prevention."
"The most valuable feature of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is the virtual patching it provides."
"Technical support is quite knowledgeable and helpful."
"I have found it beneficial when I update a policy it is implemented within a few seconds and the blocking of USB storage function."
More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security pros
 

Cons

"Our customers would like to see more automation with respect to how threats are handled once they have been detected."
"The tools are ineffective. It flags a lot of things. To give you an example, it detected Google Chrome and blocked the user's access to it. That it mistook for malicious, which turned out to be a false positive."
"The product's initial setup process could be easy."
"CylanceOPTICS could benefit from more granular control in the timeline-building process. Ideally, users would be able to drill deeper into the analysis rather than have the machine dictate the direction."
"The reporting is very weak and not very good at all."
"The detection component is something that they have to work on."
"It takes more time to investigate or dig up and understand what's going on."
"The product's technical support is slow."
More CylanceOPTICS cons
"The console is unstable, meaning it frequently malfunctions or lags, making it unreliable."
"I would suggest making the on-prem and cloud versions easier to manage via Apex One Central, a centralized management platform for customers and agents."
"Its pricing should be improved. In some cases, the user interface was not ready for our proof of concept. It wasn't a beta phase service."
"In the future, the solution should include the XDR feature."
"Could channel video more efficiently."
"The solution could improve by making the interface less confusing, it needs to be simplified."
"The solution could use signatureless detection."
"Technical support is very very slow. There is no French support. Only English. The experts are in England, the United States, or Japan, I don't know where. So the support is really lacking."
More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for CylanceOPTICS is very good; I would rate it around a nine on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the lowest. It's one of the most affordable options I've seen."
"I would rate the pricing a three out of five."
"CylanceOPTICS is probably priced equal to other EDRs in the market."
"We pay for the number of endpoints we have and that is about it. On a monthly basis, the licensing cost is $55 per user."
"The pricing for Apex One is midrange, and worth the costs."
"The pricing of Trend Micro Apex One was reasonable. There is a license required to use the solution and we have upgraded the solution to include some additional features, such as XDR."
"Apex One is a bit expensive, but the additional AWS costs are limited. It's competitive compared to other solutions in the market. It's a good price for the functionality that it provides."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"From a commercial aspect, it is a bit higher compared to other market products."
"The license fee for 300 users is approximately $2,000 USD and $500 USD for the implementation cost."
"I think that this product is expensive."
"It is okay. Compared to Sophos, it is a little bit expensive, but it is a good product and it is better than Sophos, for instance. It is equivalent to Trellix. Its cost depends on the country. I am in Turkey, and Trend Micro is not so affordable in Turkey. SMB companies are looking for cheaper products. In Turkey, enterprise customers tend to use Trend Micro, and if they have more money, then they use next-generation antivirus or EPP products such as SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, or Microsoft E5 package."
More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
19%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Insurance Company
6%
Educational Organization
26%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Optics?
I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. I would give it a close ten as possible because, like SentinelOne, I've seen incompatibility. Whereas Cylance, I've seen none.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Optics?
CylanceOPTICS is probably priced equal to other EDRs in the market. Price-wise, considering what it has to offer, you could probably get a better product.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Blackberry Optics?
The solution's contextual analysis is sometimes not very clear compared to some modern EDRs like CrowdStrike. Compared to other EDR tools, CylanceOPTICS lacks some information. It takes more time t...
See all answers
What's the difference between Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Micro Apex One?
Trend Micro Deep Security offers a lot of features. It guarantees security for your data center, cloud, and containers - all with a unified and comprehensive SaaS solution and without compromising ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Trend Micro Apex One?
It is updated automatically without much intervention from our side. We can also get some reports easily.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro Apex One?
The pricing is very high, despite the solution’s capabilities.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CylanceOPTICS Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs CylanceOPTICS
Compared 52% of the time
Rapid7 InsightIDR vs CylanceOPTICS Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR vs CylanceOPTICS
Compared 48% of the time
More CylanceOPTICS Competitors
Trend Micro Deep Security vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Micro Deep Security vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Compared 20% of the time
Trend Vision One vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Compared 18% of the time
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Compared 7% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Compared 5% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Compared 4% of the time
More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CylanceOPTICS
June 2025
CylanceOPTICS reportDownload CylanceOPTICS product report
Buyer's Guide
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
June 2025
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security reportDownload Trend Vision One Endpoint Security product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Trend Micro Apex One, OfficeScan, Trend Micro OfficeScan
 

Overview

Our cloud-native BlackBerry® Optics provide visibility, on-device threat detection and remediation across your organization. In milliseconds. And our EDR approach effectively and efficiently hunts threats while eliminating response latency. It’s the difference between a minor security event—and one that’s widespread and uncontrolled.

BlackBerry

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security delivers comprehensive antivirus, data protection, and device management. It offers robust threat detection and is deployable on-premises or via the cloud, making it versatile for endpoint security across organizations.

Emphasizing reliable endpoint security, Trend Vision One guards workstations and servers with extended detection and response features. Its machine learning-driven threat detection offers protection from malware and viruses, including zero-day threats. With seamless updates and automation, it minimizes administrative burdens, making deployment efficient. Criticisms include high resource use during scans and integration complexities, with calls for improved data loss prevention and better encryption. Users see the need for enhanced Linux support and quicker security updates.

What features define Trend Vision One Endpoint Security?
  • Real-time threat detection: Provides immediate alerts on potential risks.
  • Virtual patching: Protects against known vulnerabilities without software updates.
  • Centralized management console: Facilitates efficient device management.
  • Machine learning: Enhances detection with advanced analytics.
  • Zero-day threat protection: Guards against unforeseen attacks.
  • Ransomware detection: Identifies and prevents ransomware incursions.
  • Automated updates: Ensures systems are protected with the latest safeguards.
Which benefits are crucial in reviews?
  • Reducing administrative overhead: Automation decreases time spent on routine tasks.
  • Efficient threat response: Facilitates quick identification and mitigation of risks.
  • Seamless system updates: Keeps protection up to date without disruptions.
  • Improving operational efficiency: Integrates smoothly with existing security solutions.

In the finance sector, Trend Vision One is implemented for robust data protection and regulatory compliance. Healthcare providers rely on it for protecting sensitive patient information from cyber threats. Retailers use it for safeguarding payment systems and customer data against breaches, ensuring uninterrupted business operations.

Trend Micro
 

Sample Customers

Cerdant, Washoe County School District
Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, A&W Food Services of Canada, Babou, Beth Israel Deaconess Care Organization (BO), DCI Donor Services, Evalueserve, Gulftainer, Hiroshima Prefectural Government, MEDHOST
Buyer's Guide
CylanceOPTICS vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
June 2025
Free Report: CylanceOPTICS vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Find out what your peers are saying about CylanceOPTICS vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CylanceOPTICS vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.