Cybersixgill vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud comparison

Cybersixgill and Microsoft are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Cybersixgill is ranked #60, while Microsoft is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.1. Cybersixgill holds a 0.5% mindshare in VM, compared to Microsoft’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cybersixgill users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Cybersixgill

Read 4 Cybersixgill reviews

2,030 Views
609 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Read 89 Microsoft Defender for Cloud reviews

21,515 Views
5,164 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Cybersixgill

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Cybersixgill and Microsoft Defender for Cloud both serve different cybersecurity needs. While Cybersixgill is preferable for its pricing and customer support, Microsoft Defender for Cloud holds the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Cybersixgill offers sophisticated threat intelligence by monitoring deep and dark web activities, predictive analysis, and delivering timely email notifications on detected threats. Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides extensive cloud workload protection, seamless integration with Azure services, and advanced threat detection capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Cybersixgill could enhance its offerings by expanding its scope to cover more social media platforms and including security news from open sources. Microsoft Defender for Cloud, while robust, could simplify its integration process and improve its support for non-Azure environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybersixgill provides a straightforward deployment process that requires minimal setup time, bolstered by responsive customer support. Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more intricate deployment, particularly when extending beyond Azure ecosystems, but benefits from Microsoft’s integrated support services.

Pricing and ROI: Cybersixgill is cost-effective, offering substantial ROI by focusing on specialized threat intelligence. Microsoft Defender for Cloud, though requiring higher investment, provides notable ROI through its comprehensive security features and Azure integration which justifies its premium pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybersixgill vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cybersixgill vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybersixgill

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

60th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (23rd), Digital Risk Protection (13th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (32nd)

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Management (8th), Container Security (7th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (4th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (4th), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (5th), Microsoft Security Suite (7th), Compliance Management (4th), Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Cybersixgill is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Cloud is 3.6%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Defender for Cloud	3.6%
Cybersixgill	0.5%
Other	95.9%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

it_user1538721

General Manager - Cyber Security at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

We can easily conduct searches on leaked credentials

We can easily conduct searches on leaked credentials. It gives us the ability to look at a timeline and build profiles against companies that we are trying to protect, then track changes to credentials or leaking bucket/cloud services associated with those companies. That is the benefit for us. A lot of it is stuff that we can do manually, but it is more about the time it takes as well as the number of analysts you need to do it compared to getting it provided as a quick service. It is scalable in that we don't need a dozen people to do the work. With this tool, one person can do it.

Read full review

RyanWalker

Head Of IT at Cirrus Response

Cloud security has cut investigation time and now reveals threats faster but needs simpler oversight

When deploying AI applications, my key security concerns with Microsoft Defender for Cloud are data loss, leakage of data, and guardrails around the actual AI, and I am hoping that this is going to help me put those guardrails in place and identify data exfiltration. Microsoft Defender for Cloud has not helped me manage and secure multi-cloud environments, as we are 100 percent Microsoft and have not really got it in any other environment at all. I am not yet using the unified AI-powered security feature offered by Microsoft Defender for Cloud, but that is coming. I am not yet using the integrated XDR feature of Microsoft Defender for Cloud, but that is coming. I am not yet utilizing the GenAI threat protection features of Microsoft Defender for Cloud. That is also coming and a lot of that will come from learning it here. I have enabled the agentless scanning in my cloud environment with Microsoft Defender for Cloud. Assessing the impact on my workload protection without needing to install agents with Microsoft Defender for Cloud makes it a lot easier, but it also identifies a lot more, which puts more load on me sometimes. I would advise another organization considering Microsoft Defender for Cloud that it is the most logical route to follow if their whole ecosystem is Microsoft. It is easy to implement and it is very self-explanatory when doing it, making sense to just follow the steps as it is too simple, really. I would rate this review a 7.5 out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"To be diligent for the customer, we usually go into Cybersixgill Investigative Portal to analyze and search things. The solution tells us the reputation of cyber threat actors. So, if someone has a reputation of one, it is a really bad idea to care about what that person is saying. However, if you find someone with a reputation of nine, then there is a high probability that we need to address the problem. You can get information about these type of actors in Cybersixgill Investigative Portal. They have a huge collection, which is like having the rules/goals of the dark web and deep web without having to go there. Our analysts avoid going dark web because they have Cybersixgill Investigative Portal and can get the news from their browser, searching wherever they want."

"They also provide some of the greatest notification capabilities. I put in a customer's company name and domain names, or sometimes I put in their IP addresses as a keyword. Once Sixgill collects information that includes those keywords, they then provide us email notifications. That means we can catch information related to our customers as soon as possible."

"Rather than hiring more analysts, we have been able to do more with less and automate some of our investigation functions."

"I have been very vocal about how much this tool has helped."

"The solution’s approach of using limited open source intelligence and focusing, instead, on the Deep Web and Dark Web is what seals the deal. That is why I like them. I have other tools that I can aggregate all the open source intelligence from. I value Cybersixgill because it provides access to things that no one else does."

"The advanced analysis has made our security operations more efficient. It has also potentially given us quicker access to data that we might not have otherwise located."

"The size and scope of the solution’s collection is amazing, and when we compare what other solutions can and cannot do, we see how Cybersixgill Investigative Portal is superior in many ways."

"If I conducted research manually it would take one week, but by using Sixgill it takes two hours or three hours."

"It takes very little effort to integrate it, and it also gives very good visibility into what exactly is happening."

"The first valuable feature was the fact that it gave us a list of everything that users were surfing on the web. Having the list, we could make decisions about those sites."

"I would rate Microsoft Defender for Cloud a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is that it's intuitive."

"The features of Microsoft Defender for Cloud that I appreciate the most are automation and event detection."

"Defender for Cloud has improved our security posture, providing us with a prioritized list of security issues to remedy, which improves our security operations because we know what to tackle first."

"My favorite part of Microsoft Defender for Cloud is the compliance features. Defender covers a wide range of workloads, on par with competing products on the market."

"I would rate Microsoft Defender for Cloud a ten."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud pros

Cons

"The breadth of access to data is good, but there are gaps."

"The breadth of access to data is good, but there are gaps. More data would be my suggestion because the platform is good and I have no complaints about the system. I think it is just a case of always trying to get more data sources."

"We need real-time updated information. If we could have this, it would be amazing."

"Regarding their scraping abilities, things could be solidified. There are definitely improvements that could be made on the specificity for setting certain queries."

"We need real-time updated information. If we could have this, it would be amazing. For example, if someone was posting something, then ten second later, it was on the platform. Sometimes, it takes a minute or hours right now, depending on the forum."

"Regarding their scraping abilities, things could be solidified. There are definitely improvements that could be made on the specificity for setting certain queries."

"Sixgill has strong capabilities based on search queries, but there is some difficulty in using Sixgill. Their querying is very powerful but it can be difficult. It's not hugely complex but you need some skill to use Sixgill querying."

"Sixgill has strong capabilities based on search queries, but there is some difficulty in using Sixgill."

"For Kubernetes, I was using Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS). To see that whatever is getting deployed into AKS goes through the correct checks and balances in terms of affinities and other similar aspects and follows all the policies, we had to use a product called Stackrox. At a granular level, the built-in policies were good for Kubernetes, but to protect our containers from a coding point of view, we had to use a few other products. For example, from a programming point of view, we were using Checkmarx for static code analysis. For CIS compliance, there are no CIS benchmarks for AKS. So, we had to use other plugins to see that the CIS benchmarks are compliant. There are CIS benchmarks for Kubernetes on AWS and GCP, but there are no CIS benchmarks for AKS. So, Azure Security Center fell short from the regulatory compliance point of view, and we had to use one more product. We ended up with two different dashboards. We had Azure Security Center, and we had Stackrox that had its own dashboard. The operations team and the security team had to look at two dashboards, and they couldn't get an integrated piece. That's a drawback of Azure Security Center. Azure Security Center should provide APIs so that we can integrate its dashboard within other enterprise dashboards, such as the PowerBI dashboard. We couldn't get through these aspects, and we ended up giving Reader security permission to too many people, which was okay to some extent, but when we had to administer the users for the Stackrox portal and Azure Security Center, it became painful."

"It needs to be simplified and made more user-friendly for a non-technical person."

"Consistency is the area where the most improvement is needed. For example, there are some areas where the UI is not uniform across the board."

"For improvements, I'd like to see more use cases integrated with Microsoft Sentinel and support for multi-cloud environments beyond just Azure."

"As a micro-segmentation product, it's not so great, especially if you have a lot of systems."

"Customer service and support from Microsoft are very poor. Even for high-severity cases, response or resolution time can extend to three or four weeks."

"As an analyst, there is no way to configure or create a playbook to automate the process of flagging suspicious domains."

"The product was a bit complex to set up earlier, however, it is a bit streamlined now."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing are good. It is expensive for us because the US dollar is quite strong compared to our dollar. Otherwise, it is quite reasonable for what it is. All the tools in the market are around the same price from my experience."

"Sometimes, Cybersixgill Investigative Portal is cheaper than its competitors."

"The pricing is cheap compared with Recorded Future. Sixgill's cost-effectiveness is very good."

"Its pricing is a little bit high in terms of Azure Security Center, but the good thing is that we don't need to maintain and deploy it. So, while the pricing is high, it is native to Azure which is why we prefer using this tool."

"I'm not privy to that information, but I know it's probably close to a million dollars a year."

"The tool is pretty expensive."

"Currently, Microsoft offers only one plan at the enterprise level which is $15 per machine."

"Security Center charges $15 per resource for any workload that you onboard into it. They charge per VM or per data-base server or per application. It's not like Microsoft 365 licensing, where there are levels like E3 and E5. Security Center is pretty straightforward."

"Pricing is a consideration, but we strive to keep costs low by enabling only necessary services."

"Microsoft's licensing and pricing are sometimes complicated. If someone is new to Microsoft's licensing, they might have difficulty with it."

"Although I am outside of the discussion on budget and costing, I can say that the importance of security provided by this solution is of such importance that whatever the cost is, it is not a factor."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How is Prisma Cloud vs Azure Security Center for security?

Azure Security Center is very easy to use, integrates well, and gives very good visibility on what is happening across your ecosystem. It also has great remote workforce capabilities and supports a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Microsoft Defender for Cloud was pretty straightforward. We did have a consultation with a third party to go over different tiers and produ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

Microsoft Defender for Cloud can be improved. An additional feature that should be included in the next release is Zero Trust, similar to ThreatLocker software.

See all answers

Comparisons

Recorded Future vs Cybersixgill

Compared 12% of the time

Flashpoint Intelligence Platform vs Cybersixgill

Compared 6% of the time

ThreatBook Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Cybersixgill

Compared 4% of the time

HackerOne vs Cybersixgill

Compared 4% of the time

AttackIQ vs Cybersixgill

Compared 4% of the time

More Cybersixgill Competitors

AWS GuardDuty vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 33% of the time

Wiz vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cybersixgill

March 2026

Download Cybersixgill product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

March 2026

Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Azure Security Center, Azure Security Center, Microsoft ASC, Azure Defender

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Cybersixgill

Microsoft

Overview

Cybersixgill offers real-time, automated threat intelligence solutions to combat cybercrime, detect phishing, data leaks, fraud, and vulnerabilities while enhancing incident response capabilities for organizations.

Cybersixgill provides security teams with contextual, actionable alerts and covert investigation capabilities through its Investigative Portal. Powered by the deepest data lake of dark web activities, users can receive customized, real-time alerts. The service facilitates in-depth investigations with a comprehensive view of threats and enables profiling of threat actors, with analysis across multiple parameters including language, sites, and timeframes. Its cloud-based access supports organizations in identifying and mitigating risks effectively.

What features make Cybersixgill stand out?

Deep Web Intelligence: Access unmatched data from closed forums and unique sources.
Customizable Alerts: Receive tailored alerts specific to organizational needs.
Comprehensive Search Engine: Explore extensive databases with flexible queries.
Automatic Translations: Instantly translate content across different languages.
Threat Actor Analysis: Research profiles, methods, and histories of cyber threats.
Credential Tracking: Save time with efficient tracking tools.
Scalability: Efficiently monitor and analyze threats without excessive manpower.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automate threat tracking without extensive resource demands.
Unique Data Access: Gain insights unavailable through other platforms.
Enhanced Risk Assessment: Comprehensive threat profiles aid in proactive security.
Improved Threat Monitoring: Monitor dark web activities effectively.
Flexibility: Adapt search and analysis to specific security scenarios.

In industries where cyber intelligence and risk assessment are critical, such as finance and retail, Cybersixgill enables organizations to gather intelligence and monitor threats. Many use it to track illegal activities like credit card fraud on the dark web and assess threats to client operations. Its Investigative Portal provides insights into emerging malware trends and underground activities, supporting proactive threat management strategies.

Cybersixgill

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for cloud workloads. It offers real-time visibility into the security posture of cloud environments, enabling organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud can detect and block sophisticated attacks, including zero-day exploits and fileless malware.

The solution also provides automated remediation capabilities, allowing security teams to quickly and easily respond to security incidents. With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, organizations can ensure the security and compliance of their cloud workloads, while reducing the burden on their security teams.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Current customers include large enterprises, financial services, manufacturing, GSIs, MSSPs, government and law enforcement entities.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is trusted by companies such as ASOS, Vatenfall, SWC Technology Partners, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Cybersixgill vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud

March 2026

Free Report: Cybersixgill vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Cybersixgill vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cybersixgill vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.