CyberHat CYREBRO vs Netsurion comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CyberHat Logo
401 views|173 comparisons
Netsurion Logo
434 views|158 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberHat CYREBRO and Netsurion based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Networks, Netsurion, Palo Alto Networks and others in SOC as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed SOC as a Service Report (Updated: February 2024).
757,198 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The pricing and licensing seem very reasonable. The managed service part of it feels like it gives me the equivalent of a full-time engineer for a lot less money. So, I feel it's a good value."
  • "Licensing is very easy. Our CIO takes care of the billing, but in terms of price point, he hasn't complained, so it must be good."
  • "The solution is fairly expensive, but in my experience, all of the SIEM applications that I've evaluated or looked at cost about the same."
  • "The upfront costs have increased, and we have been locked into this contract. The cost of changing over from it is way too high."
  • "I don't know if the pricing is by the seat but we're paying about $20,000 to 25,000 a year. On top of that, we pay for the managed support services. That runs us about another $35,000 or $40,000 a year."
  • "When we first got the EventTracker product, we were using SIEM Simplified. At the time they didn't call it that, but it was more of a service thing. So, there was a bit more hand-holding and getting stuff set up, along with failure reports, that they did during the first one to two years. Then, we decided that the the additional money to have someone do these daily reports wasn't terribly useful, so we discontinued that service."
  • "EventTracker's subscription-based model is interesting as far as yearly license type stuff. It's nice because you know what it's going to be next year. We haven't really looked at any other solutions. The pricing at the time compared to the other solutions was a lot less. A couple of years ago, we actually looked at Splunk. The amount in Splunk's licensing model is based on 20 gigs a day, or something like that. Based on our number of logs and stuff that we were already generating, the costs would be substantially more for the amount of logs that we would be getting."
  • "In the security space, it's hard to quantify your return on investment. So, I don't. We spend about $40,000 a year and so. It's hard to say if the SIEM saved that much money."
  • More Netsurion Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SOC as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    757,198 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Their pricing is high. I don't know if it's a barrier. The quality speaks to the price. The price is the price. They provide what they promise. From a purchasing perspective, I just have to come back… more »
    Top Answer:There is one area that needs improvement and that is with the agents and the server that's on-site. The system requirements are very, very high. So I need a pretty powerful server to run. If they… more »
    out of 27 in SOC as a Service
    Average Words per Review
    out of 27 in SOC as a Service
    Average Words per Review
    Also Known As
    Netsurion Managed Threat Protection, Netsurion EventTracker
    Learn More
    Video Not Available
    Video Not Available

    CyberHat is a leading cyber security solutions company, specializing in cyber defense, Security Operations Centers, Security Assessment, Advanced Hacking Simulations, Intelligence and a wide range of professional solutions.

    Our open XDR platform unifies your existing security telemetry to deliver wider attack surface coverage and deeper threat analytics resulting in greater security visibility. Our SOC does the heavy lifting for you of proactive threat hunting, event correlation and analysis, and provides you with guided remediation. The result is a force multiplier that allows your IT team to be confident and in control again while also maximizing all of your cybersecurity investments.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    The Salvation Army, The FRESH Market, Pacific Western Bank, NASA, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), and Talbot’s Stores
    Top Industries
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Legal Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Non Profit9%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Computer Software Company28%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Company Size
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise48%
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise29%
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise46%
    Buyer's Guide
    SOC as a Service
    February 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Networks, Netsurion, Palo Alto Networks and others in SOC as a Service. Updated: February 2024.
    757,198 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CyberHat CYREBRO is ranked 5th in SOC as a Service while Netsurion is ranked 2nd in SOC as a Service with 5 reviews. CyberHat CYREBRO is rated 0.0, while Netsurion is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netsurion writes "Provides real-time alerting, a dedicated team, and around-the-clock monitoring". CyberHat CYREBRO is most compared with Cygilant SOC as a Service, whereas Netsurion is most compared with Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response and Wazuh.

    See our list of best SOC as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all SOC as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.