Cybereason XDR vs Elastic Security comparison

Cybereason and Elastic are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. Cybereason is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.7, while Elastic is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8. Cybereason holds a 0.7% mindshare in XDR, compared to Elastic’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Elastic users who would recommend it.

Cybereason XDR

Read 3 Cybereason XDR reviews

1,467 Views
1,452 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Elastic Security

Read 65 Elastic Security reviews

11,565 Views
5,436 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Cybereason XDR

Elastic Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Elastic Security and Cybereason XDR compete in endpoint protection and detection. Cybereason XDR has the upper hand due to its advanced features and flexibility, while Elastic Security offers budget-friendly options.

Features: Elastic Security offers robust search capabilities, comprehensive real-time threat analysis, and strong community support. Cybereason XDR provides machine learning-driven detection, automated incident response, and sophisticated threat-hunting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Elastic Security requires enhanced scalability, better integration with third-party tools, and improvements in its technical support. Cybereason XDR needs more streamlined reporting, better integration within complex environments, and refined documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Security has straightforward deployment but users suggest improvements in technical support. Cybereason XDR is praised for easy setup and responsive customer service, though documentation needs improvement.

Pricing and ROI: Elastic Security is cost-effective with attractive entry pricing, making it appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Cybereason XDR, despite being more expensive, is seen as providing strong ROI due to its innovative features.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason XDR vs. Elastic Security Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason XDR vs. Elastic Security

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason XDR

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

23rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Elastic Security

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (10th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (16th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Cybereason XDR is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Security is 4.9%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Featured Reviews

Peter Nowak

Business Development Manager for Cybereason at Bechtle

Integration of multiple firewalls enables advanced threat detection

The integration of data from firewalls and Active Directory is most valuable. Cybereason XDR facilitates two-way communication, where the firewall sends data to the Cybereason system, and it can communicate with the firewall to stop unwanted communication. Customers can deal with multiple types of firewalls with ease. The behavioral analytics help detect advanced threats when attackers use existing software. The multilayered protection approach, including NGAV, integrates XDR detection with antivirus to assess and counter threats effectively.

Read full review

SyedAli17

Assistant Director at PTA

Centralized monitoring improves security posture through rapid data processing

The processing part of Elastic Security ( /products/elastic-security-reviews ) is very interesting for us since we handle almost 7,000 to 8,000 alerts per minute. We require rapid processing speed for alerts and event data, and Elastic Security is very efficient at handling this level of data. Additionally, Elastic Security helps improve the security posture of Pakistan through centralized visibility and real-time processing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cybereason XDR's most useful feature is the investigation."

"The integration of data from firewalls and Active Directory is most valuable."

"The solution has an investigation feature, which is useful for building storylines."

"The tool's functionality is good for overall security and incident response times."

"Elastic Security is very easy to adapt."

"It's simple and easy to use."

"It's open-source and free to use."

"It is scalable."

"The solution is quite stable. The performance has been good."

"Elastic Security is cost-effective compared to Defender and CrowdStrike."

"The product has huge integration varieties available."

More Elastic Security pros

Cons

"Customer service is rated as a five out of ten. When they work and reach the right level, they are helpful, but getting to the right person can be time-consuming."

"There could be more integrations with other data sources like NDR systems."

"Cybereason's customer support could be better."

"The one thing we sometimes have issues with is its integration with other security applications like antiviruses."

"It could use maybe a little more on the Linux side."

"The problem with ELK is it's difficult to administer. When you have a problem, it can be very, very difficult to rebuild indexes."

"We set up a cron job to delete old logs so that we wouldn't hit a disk space issue. Such a feature should be available in the UI, where old logs can be deleted automatically. (Don’t know if this feature is already there)."

"It is difficult to anticipate and understand the space utilization, so more clarity there would be great."

"The interface could be more user friendly because it is sometimes hard to deal with."

"In terms of what could be improved with Elastic, in some use cases, especially on the advanced level, they are not ready made, so you'll have to write some scripts."

"Elastic Security has a steep learning curve, so it takes some time to tune it and set it up for your environment. There are some costs associated with logging things that don't have value. So you need to be cautious to only log things that make sense and keep them around for as long as you need. You shouldn't hold onto things just because you think you might need them."

"One limitation of Elastic Security is that it does not have built-in workflows for all tasks. For example, if you need a workflow for compliance, you will need to create a custom workflow."

More Elastic Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheaper than Microsoft Defender. It has a subscription and no standard license."

"There is no charge for using the open-source version."

"Its price is fine. Its licensing works on a yearly basis. We have to renew the license every year. I also have a good experience with Darktrace. When we buy Darktrace, we get training free of cost, which is not there in Elastic. We have to pay extra for training. There is certainly room for improvement."

"We use the open-source version, so there is no charge for this solution."

"The solution is not expensive and costs around ten dollars a month."

"The licensing cost of Elastic Security is based on the daily ingestion rate. I can't recall the exact figure, but for 10GB of log action daily, it would cost around $20,000."

"I can say that the product is cheaply priced."

"Elastic Security is free to use."

"Compared to other tools, Elastic Security is a cheaper solution."

More Elastic Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cybereason XDR?

The solution has an investigation feature, which is useful for building storylines.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cybereason XDR?

There could be more integrations with other data sources like NDR systems. Additionally, technical support has been slow in recent times. Enabling multifactor authentication has been problematic fo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cybereason XDR?

I use Cybereason XDR for customers who don't have a SOC or managed SOC yet and want to be protected on more than their desktops. It is especially used in the manufacturing industry, yet not exclusi...

See all answers

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Elastic Security?

Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?

I am satisfied with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing cost. It is a pure 10.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 35% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 25% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 18% of the time

Cynet vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 13% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 10% of the time

More Cybereason XDR Competitors

Wazuh vs Elastic Security

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Elastic Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Elastic Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

July 2025

Download Cybereason XDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security

August 2025

Download Elastic Security product report

Also Known As

No data available

Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash

Overview

Cybereason is the leader in endpoint protection, offering endpoint detection and response, next-generation antivirus, and managed monitoring services. Founded by elite intelligence professionals born and bred in offense-first hunting, Cybereason gives enterprises the upper hand over cyber adversaries.

Cybereason

Elastic Security is a robust, open-source security solution designed to offer integrated threat prevention, detection, and response capabilities across an organization's entire digital estate. Part of the Elastic Stack (which includes Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana), Elastic Security leverages the power of search, analytics, and data aggregation to provide real-time insight into threats and vulnerabilities. It is a comprehensive platform that supports a wide range of security needs, from endpoint protection to cloud and network security, making it a versatile choice for organizations looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.

Additional offerings and benefits:

The platform utilizes advanced analytics, machine learning algorithms, and anomaly detection to identify threats and suspicious activities.
It offers extensive integration options with other tools and platforms, facilitating a more cohesive and comprehensive security ecosystem.
With Kibana, users gain access to powerful visualization tools and dashboards that provide real-time insight into security data.

Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.

Elastic

Sample Customers

MOTOROLA MOBILITY

Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason XDR vs. Elastic Security

July 2025

Free Report: Cybereason XDR vs. Elastic Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason XDR vs. Elastic Security and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cybereason XDR vs. Elastic Security report.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.