Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) comparison

Cybereason and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Cybereason is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.2, while Trellix is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.4. Cybereason holds a 1.0% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Read 21 Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews

2,722 Views
339 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Read 23 Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews

1,738 Views
307 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is compared against Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Trellix stands out in terms of its features, making it a more valued choice despite higher costs.

Features: Cybereason offers real-time threat detection, automated response capabilities, and user-friendly interface. Trellix provides comprehensive threat intelligence, machine learning integration, and advanced analytics. Trellix offers superior features that users find more valuable.

Room for Improvement: Cybereason could enhance its reporting capabilities, reduce system resource usage, and improve user training resources. Trellix could improve integration with third-party tools, offer faster updates, and streamline feature complexity. Users identify more technical facets for Trellix.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive support. Trellix gets positive reviews for deployment but is slightly less user-friendly. Trellix's customer service is considered excellent. Cybereason may be easier for initial setup, while Trellix is reliable in ongoing support.

Pricing and ROI: Cybereason is noted for cost-effectiveness and good return on investment. Trellix, though higher in cost, is seen as worth the investment due to advanced features and reliable performance. Cybereason is more budget-friendly, while Trellix provides higher value relative to its price.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (36th)

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

23rd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.0%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

AtulChaurasia

Operational Technical Security at Metro Bank

Scalable platform with intuitive features for detecting malicious files

The initial setup process is straightforward. We have to install the agent, create a package, and deploy it on servers. It has a prebuilt console managed by the cloud team of Cybereason. We don't have to worry about the console and concentrate on endpoint implementation. It takes ten days to deploy it on 10,000 devices.

Read full review

CESARCASTRO

Committee of IT Cybersececurity at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees

Enhancements needed for security alerts while ongoing training strengthens defenses

This year, I am going to improve some tools to be installed or maybe acquire some services to better manage our web services and work with my coworkers. Application fiber also needs attention. Nowadays I am making applications that are publicly seen on the Internet. I need some protection, possibly multi-factor authentication improvements. I am seeing, for workflows, some sort of ethical hacking to test our environment. Knowledge of everything, not only the product - maybe some kind of alerts - needs to emerge. I see the current ones as very low-tier, and they must improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup was easy and straightforward."

"The dashboard is very good and you can consider it as an interactive UI."

"For me, the technical support is good."

"It gives all the information in a clear response."

"Immediately we can pick up the computers in the network if any malicious operation that is triggered."

"We didn't have the visibility that we now have. It has increased our visibility by a lot. So, we put a lot more time into really looking at our environment and what is happening throughout our different networks. It has increased our visibility by around fivefold."

"Cybereason's threat hunting and investigation are the most valuable features. Threat hunting is a user-friendly feature that keeps you safe. Investigation offers an added value that I haven't seen with other EDR services. It allows you to find specific policy problems within your environment."

"What I like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is the support because the support is good. The solution is also easy to use, and it has a dashboard. Everything is good, and there's no problem with it."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its area for threat detection."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the ability to isolate or quarantine devices and block or detect Ransomware and other well-known tools that are used to exploit vulnerabilities on devices."

"It relies on external systems for detection and then asks the endpoint to handle blocking. However, the most crucial feature is its investigative capabilities. With real-time search and other functionalities, it enables comprehensive detection and response."

"The product and the services we have are quite good."

"Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) offers endpoint protection and helps collect information while also allowing users to investigate malicious files in an IT environment...It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"Trellix has done a good job reducing threats."

"Blocking browser navigation is a feature of the solution with which we have experienced success."

"The most valuable feature I found in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is the guided analytics or guided EDR investigation."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pros

Cons

"The integration with Microsoft solutions and Microsoft capabilities needs to be improved."

"The reporting feature needs improvement."

"It should be more stable, and the sensor needs improvement in terms of connectivity."

"Ad hoc higher-level reporting to senior management can be improved or can be implemented. That's definitely an area of improvement that they need to focus on."

"What needs to improve in Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and what I'd like to see in its next release is a centralized dashboard that allows you to view what is there, similar to what's on Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager: a beautiful display and reporting. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has to start with the compliance, the homepage, etc. Everything should be there and should be customizable. The options should be there. The tool is very good currently, but visibility for IT administrators is lacking and needs to be worked on."

"It initially took some time to deploy."

"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."

"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"Some modules that are doing machine learning and artificial intelligence are blocking our processes."

"The dashboard and reporting features are not so user-friendly or intuitive, so they need some work."

"I remember doing many tickets for Trellix support, and my EDR was not properly functioning. I didn't feel the detection or the real protection."

"The technical support must be improved."

"The CPU utilization of the product is quite high compared to its competitors."

"Trellix needs to focus on gaining traction with partners and building trust among users."

"The solution lacks the ability to integrate with external platforms. In future releases of the solution, I would like to see the solution increase its integration capabilities with external platforms."

"The graphical view for nodes must be increased."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

"The pricing is manageable."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"Speaking about the price, you must use the product to find the product's cost for you."

"The cost is okay, compared to other products."

"The price is reasonable."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is not that expensive, but it's not something that a startup could buy. Pricing for it is for midsized businesses. There's an additional payment if you want data retention for more than thirty days. They gave us data retention for thirty days. Then if you want longer data retention, they have the paid option for a three-month data retention period and for a one-year data retention period."

"The product’s pricing is reasonable."

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is reasonable in terms of cost. It's a tool my company has been using for a few years now. It costs $25,000 to $30,000 for six hundred users."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

Trellix has a user-friendly interface.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

I haven't had any really great problems with pricing in the past two or three years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 26% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 47% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 17% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 5% of the time

Elastic Security vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 5% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

June 2025

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

May 2025

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report

Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) product report

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Reduce Alert Noise

Reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. Trellix EDR helps security analysts quickly prioritize threats and minimize potential disruption.

Do More with Existing Resources

Guided investigation automatically asks and answers questions while gathering, summarizing, and visualizing evidence from multiple sources—reducing the need for more SOC resources.

Low-Maintenance Cloud Solution

Cloud-based deployment and analytics enables your skilled security analysts to focus on strategic defense, instead of tool maintenance. Benefit from implementing the right solution for you.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Sutherland Global Services

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

June 2025

Free Report: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.