CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs VMware Carbon Black App Control comparison

CyberArk and VMware are both solutions in the Application Control category. CyberArk is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5, while VMware is ranked #2. CyberArk holds a 3.6% mindshare in AC, compared to VMware’s 22.1% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of VMware users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Read 38 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews

42 Views
7 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

VMware Carbon Black App Con...

Read 8 VMware Carbon Black App Control reviews

800 Views
223 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

VMware Carbon Black App Con...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and VMware Carbon Black App Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. VMware Carbon Black App Control Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. VMware Carbon Black App Control

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Ranking in Application Control

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Compliance (5th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (4th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Ransomware Protection (6th)

VMware Carbon Black App Con...

Ranking in Application Control

2nd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Control category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 3.6%. The mindshare of VMware Carbon Black App Control is 22.1%, down from 33.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Control

Featured Reviews

Sumit Chavan

Lead Consultant at Aujas Networks Pvt Ltd

Helps secure the infrastructure and control users with admin rights

There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good. Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console. We can only create computer-based policies. The database is available, but there is a drawback in not being able to create local groups on the EPM console. We only have to depend on Active Directory. This limits infrastructure security as we depend on the Active Directory team to manage user groups. If they remove any users, we lose control. If we could create groups locally and block them or set specific policies, we would have more control. Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site. Moreover, there is an issue with policies not running as expected when we make enhancements. We have to find multiple ways to whitelist applications or enhance policies.

Read full review

Abul Atti M Salem

Cybersecurity Consultant at KAFD DMC

We can isolate problem machines and limit their access

We use App Control to scan the network for virtual machines that have unauthorized applications. We can isolate the problem VMs and control application access. More than two years. I rate Carbon Black App Control 10 out of 10 for stability. I rate App Control six out of 10 for scalability.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is entirely cloud-based, so no further upkeep is required."

"I have always found that CyberArk is a very tight, foolproof product compared to most other products available."

"The solution is scalable."

"This is the number one product for privilege account security."

"In terms of ROI, deploying CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has secured the infrastructure, which saves money, time, and resources."

"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution."

"It allows whitelisting."

"The most valuable feature is that it does lifecycle management and that it will change to whatever the end target is."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros

"All the functions within VMware Carbon Black App Control are valuable."

"If any malicious activity, like VAT viruses, anything RNE, ZOD malware, or something similar, comes in we know that unless we approve it, it's going to be blocked."

"The effectiveness of application whitelisting is very good."

"The visibility is valuable."

"The visibility, reporting, and the ability to stop or prevent malicious or undesired applications from being installed are the most valuable features."

"I use the console to check for threats and I find it to be very user-friendly."

"We use App Control to scan the network for virtual machines that have unauthorized applications. We can isolate the problem VMs and control application access."

"The API integration is good."

Cons

"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."

"CyberArk meets clients' need very spot-on. It covers everything customers ask for. As for improvements, honestly, the feedback's been really positive. I haven't heard any specific areas that need work."

"The price of the solution should improve."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can improve its Identity Governance, which is already working effectively yet could continue to enhance its capabilities."

"The CyberArk team is working on a feature to identify devices without the Endpoint Privilege Manager running, which is currently missing."

"A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good."

"The product's threat protection and defense capabilities need enhancement."

"The solution can be complex to use at times."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons

"I would like to see the addition of some more features that are in other, similar solutions."

"The solution should have overhead in keeping lists of applications that you want don't want to run."

"The initial setup is somewhat complex."

"The reporting is not good and needs to be improved."

"Carbon Black does not use the database for identifying the file, the fields, or malware."

"I rate App Control six out of 10 for scalability."

"Its setup is very complex, and it requires guidance from the support team, but it is well worth the effort."

"Another issue is that even sometimes if you approve, for example, Adobe as a publisher, you say any product or anything that's from Adobe has to run. It generally runs, but especially in a large environment and with a lot of users, sometimes, due to some certification validation issues or some other issue, it might stop the process from running. Genuine processes like Adobe and Chrome can get blocked. so that needs to be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost for CyberArk is very high."

"Pricing depends on how many devices you use. Right now, on-premise, it costs us a little, but it's worth it. It seems like the cloud solution is much more expensive. We got this solution one year ago, and it's like we bought the solution, and now they are not going to support it on-premise anymore. We are in the implementation phase, and we missed this, and we already paid for the licenses. This is wasted time from my perspective, and CyberArk should be more customer-friendly."

"We pay about $17 per user."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a very high price, so it's a one out of ten for me in terms of pricing."

"I think that it was in the range of $200,000 that had to get approved."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable for customers."

"licensing for this solution is based on the number of APV (privileged users), and the number of sessions that you want to record."

"The professional services for one eight-hour day would be $1,800."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice

"The pricing for this product is competitive and our customers who told us that often, Carbon Back is the cheaper solution."

"Its price is reasonable and what is expected for these types of products."

"We pay a fee for support, which is renewed annually."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Educational Organization

23%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing t...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 24% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 15% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 14% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors

Ivanti Application Control vs VMware Carbon Black App Control

Compared 27% of the time

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs VMware Carbon Black App Control

Compared 25% of the time

McAfee Application Control vs VMware Carbon Black App Control

Compared 24% of the time

Check Point Application Control vs VMware Carbon Black App Control

Compared 12% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs VMware Carbon Black App Control

Compared 12% of the time

More VMware Carbon Black App Control Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

June 2025

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report

Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Carbon Black App Control

May 2025

Download VMware Carbon Black App Control product report

Also Known As

Viewfinity

CB Protection, Carbon Black CB Protection

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

CyberArk

Carbon Black is a leading provider of next-generation endpoint security. Carbon Black serves more than 3,700 customers globally, including 33 of the Fortune 100. As a cybersecurity innovator, Carbon Black has a strong heritage of innovative technology leadership in multiple endpoint security categories, including application control, endpoint detection and response (EDR), and next-generation antivirus (NGAV). Leveraging its big data and analytics cloud platform - the Cb Predictive Security Cloud - Carbon Black solutions enable customers to defend against the most advanced cyber threats, including malware, ransomware, and non-malware attacks. Deployed via the cloud, on premise, or as a managed service, customers use Carbon Black solutions to lock down critical systems, hunt threats, and replace legacy antivirus.

VMware

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Kaas Tailored, Core-Mark, Indeed, Hologic, Landmark Credit Union, Project Worldwide

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. VMware Carbon Black App Control

June 2025

Free Report: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. VMware Carbon Black App Control

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. VMware Carbon Black App Control and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. VMware Carbon Black App Control report.

See our list of best Application Control vendors.

We monitor all Application Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.