CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Sectona Privileged Access Management comparison

CyberArk and Sectona are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. CyberArk is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.8, while Sectona is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5. CyberArk holds a 2.6% mindshare in PAM, compared to Sectona’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sectona users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Read 38 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews

3,967 Views
1,190 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Sectona Privileged Access M...

Read 4 Sectona Privileged Access Management reviews

529 Views
529 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Sectona Privileged Access M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Sectona Privileged Access Management are prominent competitors in the privileged access management category. Users report higher satisfaction with CyberArk's pricing and support, while Sectona's superior feature offerings make it a compelling choice for many.

Features: CyberArk provides granular control, customization options, and robust endpoint security features. Sectona excels in comprehensive access control, superior integration capabilities, and suitability for multi-cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk needs improvements in scalability, simplified setup, and better documentation. Sectona requires performance optimization, extended analytics, and better reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk is noted for its straightforward deployment with some initial configuration challenges. Sectona offers smooth deployment but faces occasional delays in customer service responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk is seen as cost-effective with competitive ROI and lower setup costs. Sectona, although more expensive, offers excellent long-term ROI through its comprehensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Compliance (4th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (3rd), Ransomware Protection (5th)

Sectona Privileged Access M...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 2.6%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sectona Privileged Access Management is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager	2.6%
Sectona Privileged Access Management	0.9%
Other	96.5%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Sumit Chavan

Lead Consultant at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Helps secure the infrastructure and control users with admin rights

There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good. Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console. We can only create computer-based policies. The database is available, but there is a drawback in not being able to create local groups on the EPM console. We only have to depend on Active Directory. This limits infrastructure security as we depend on the Active Directory team to manage user groups. If they remove any users, we lose control. If we could create groups locally and block them or set specific policies, we would have more control. Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site. Moreover, there is an issue with policies not running as expected when we make enhancements. We have to find multiple ways to whitelist applications or enhance policies.

Read full review

Pankaj-Mishra

Senior IT Security Engineer at Mahindra Group

Effective risk management, feature of recording all privileged user activities in a compressed format but limited SaaS capability

There are some areas where the GUI could be improved to make it easier to find and update privileged settings and policies. For example, when creating a PAM policy for Privileged, some of the scroll boxes are difficult to navigate. It would be easier if there were one-click options for checking and unchecking boxes rather than having to scroll down and select individual items. This would make the GUI more user-friendly for administrators and SOC teams. So, I would like to see the GUI made more user-friendly, especially for administrators and SOC teams. In future releases, I would like to be able to manage Sectona PAM by location. For example, I'm the global headquarters lead in India, and we have 200 locations around the world. I would like to be able to create sub-locations, so that when I click on support for a location, the configuration is separate. However, the monitoring should still be at the parent level.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has had a positive impact on my customers' security posture."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is entirely cloud-based, so no further upkeep is required."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager helped us reduce the time for regulatory processes to approximately two to four months, completing the solution and training."

"This is the number one product for privilege account security."

"We can do both server and endpoint protection."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) 's most valuable feature is its ability to manage user application privileges and protect against ransomware attacks by controlling access to specific files and applications."

"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."

"What sets CyberArk apart is its continuous innovation, staying ahead of the competition."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros

"The most valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management for protecting Privileged accounts is its built-in launcher. Additionally, the single sign-on capability is good. Sectona's session recording feature is particularly noteworthy because it utilizes minimal storage. Instead of recording entire sessions, it captures activity only when necessary, optimizing storage space."

"The most valuable feature is the risk management. When a Privileged user performs a certain command, such as running a script, the system highlights it in the risk management section as high, critical, or medium risk."

"The most valuable features of Sectona Privileged Access Management include robust session monitoring for privileged users."

"A key factor for my company is support, and Sectona Privileged Access Management has good support. Another valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management is that it's easy to onboard."

Cons

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a perfect solution, but CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for Linux has many issues. Another area for improvement in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, specifically for Windows, is that there's no way for you to check credential theft from a text file, such as a notepad file."

"The price of the solution should improve."

"Despite newer versions and functionalities, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager lacks sufficient knowledgeable support staff, resulting in longer wait times for assistance."

"The tool should be more user-friendly."

"The solution is very expensive."

"We have had some major issues with the tool, but we have worked with the R&D teams and we have worked with support. There is room for improvement, especially on response times. But they're working on it and they're doing the best they can."

"CyberArk has some performance issues. For example, servers could not handle the solution when we first took CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager."

"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons

"I would like to see future updates include robust support for cloud environments as organizations increasingly move towards cloud-based solutions."

"Sectona needs to think about SaaS solutions and cloud use cases. For example, we need to be able to integrate Sectona PAM with next-generation applications such as Docker and Lambda, as well as ITD pipelines that use privileged user data."

"Sectona Privileged Access Management needs to improve its stability. It needs to enhance the product's stability because of frequent updates. This is crucial for a solution like Privileged Access Management, as organizations rely on stability. When it becomes unstable, it causes panic."

"As I don't have at least one to two years of experience with Sectona Privileged Access Management, I cannot share areas for improvement in the solution. To me, Sectona Privileged Access Management has reasonable pricing, but it could still be improved. I'm also unsure if Sectona Privileged Access Management could cover the requirements of large-sized companies, but for small-sized to medium-sized companies, I'd recommend the solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"licensing for this solution is based on the number of APV (privileged users), and the number of sessions that you want to record."

"It's not at the lower end of the market. I think the price is reasonable considering the quality it delivers. It is a top-notch solution at a fair price point."

"The solution requires an annual license to use it. There can be some extra costs in some cases."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable for customers."

"I feel that the price of the product is nominal. It must be around 10 to 15 USD per installation. I rate the product price an eight to nine out of ten, where one is high price, and ten is low price."

"The product's license is easy to procure."

"I think that it was in the range of $200,000 that had to get approved."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice

"Sectona Privileged Access Management's pricing is relatively cheaper and aggressive. It is affordable, especially for the Indian market and globally. Compared to competitors, Sectona offers a very good price range."

"The licensing cost for Sectona Privileged Access Management is reasonable, though I cannot share the figure because that's confidential information. I'm not paying for additional costs because the current license covers my requirements. I'd rate the pricing for Sectona Privileged Access Management a three on a scale of one to five."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Healthcare Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sectona Privileged Access Management?

The most valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management for protecting Privileged accounts is its built-in launcher. Additionally, the single sign-on capability is good. Sectona's session...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sectona Privileged Access Management?

Sectona Privileged Access Management's pricing is relatively cheaper and aggressive. It is affordable, especially for the Indian market and globally. Compared to competitors, Sectona offers a very ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sectona Privileged Access Management?

Sectona Privileged Access Management needs to improve its stability. It needs to enhance the product's stability because of frequent updates. This is crucial for a solution like Privileged Access M...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 11% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 9% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 48% of the time

ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 29% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 23% of the time

More Sectona Privileged Access Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

January 2026

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report

Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Sectona Privileged Access Management

January 2026

Sectona Privileged Access Management report

Download Sectona Privileged Access Management product report

Also Known As

Viewfinity

No data available

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

CyberArk

Sectona is a Privileged Access Management company that helps enterprises mitigate risk of targeted attacks to privileged accounts spread across data centers and cloud. Sectona delivers integrated privilege management components for securing dynamic remote workforce access across on-premises or cloud workloads, endpoints and machine to machine communication.

Sectona with its light, integrated approach provides a single console for securing passwords & secrets in embedded vault, secure access with cross-platform access technology & manage privileges over endpoints.

Sectona

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management

December 2025

Free Report: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.