We performed a comparison between Correlsense SharePath and POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
The APM solution fully integrated with Real End User Monitoring and Synthetic Monitoring.
Be able to monitor and diagnose quickly any application performance slowdown with a fully integrated APM and User Monitoring solution. Start from the End User eyes and application response time monitoring down to code analysis and diagnostic. It has never been so easy to discover the root cause of any slow response time.
With few clics you can drill down and fix a problem to avoid any end user dissatisfaction or complain. APM is now integrated with End User Monitoring for a full understanding of what is happening. You can now monitor End User Satisfaction in production.
Correlsense SharePath is ranked 84th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is ranked 66th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Correlsense SharePath is rated 8.0, while POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is rated 8.8. On the other hand, Correlsense SharePath is most compared with , whereas POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.