

Umbrella and CoreStack are competing cloud management solutions. CoreStack has the upper hand in features and ease of deployment, appealing to businesses prioritizing advanced control and integration capabilities.
Features: Umbrella focuses on threat intelligence and internet security, providing DNS-layer security, secure web gateway, and threat intelligence. CoreStack provides multi-cloud governance, AI-driven operations, and cost management, delivering better control over cloud operations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CoreStack offers a streamlined deployment model, strong integration support, and responsive customer service. Umbrella emphasizes straightforward deployment with user-friendly installation and quick time to protection.
Pricing and ROI: Umbrella's setup cost is lower, offering quicker ROI by focusing on specific security features with minimal infrastructure changes. CoreStack's higher setup cost arises from its comprehensive feature set, but it provides long-term ROI through effective cost management and resource optimization.
With 20 reports every month, that's 80 hours saved, equating to two man-weeks per month, or $8,000 in savings based on a $100 hourly rate for my architect.
We suggested they proceed with CoreStack, and after onboarding it to our offering, within three months, we received positive feedback from customers that we were able to reduce some of their costs.
It generates value addition on top of the Trusted Advisor report, which saves major effort for our resources.
The platform has helped reduce security risk by proactively blocking malicious websites, phishing attempts, and other threats at the DNS layer before they reach the end users.
We have seen a significant return on investment, which I mentioned earlier in the data.
We have seen an approximate ROI of around 231% over three years.
CoreStack has positively impacted my organization by saving hours of time for reporting—for example, the governance report which my employees used to take at least four hours for one customer.
I have interacted with CoreStack's customer support, and we managed to obtain a technical demo from their team for my team from time to time.
I can reach them anytime for any problem I am having in my environment, and they provide great support with minimum downtime for any problem I may have.
Cisco Umbrella's customer support is very good, and the product itself is supported by strong customer service.
I rate the customer support of Umbrella 10 out of 10.
It generates and captures metrics of your workload, which meets our requirements all the time.
We haven't encountered any issues regarding scalability; the SaaS platform easily accommodates our growth.
Since it is a cloud-delivered service, it can support a growing number of users, devices, and locations without requiring significant on-premises infrastructure.
Umbrella has definitely handled our organizational growth perfectly.
Umbrella's scalability is very much flexible as you just buy a license and you can scale as much as you want.
Umbrella is definitely a scalable and stable solution.
Umbrella has taken action by preventing and blocking access.
To my knowledge, everything went well when I was using that technology.
The recommendations made in CoreStack to delete a machine have the potential to generate major cost savings.
We need more security features, particularly since the market is increasingly demanding better security tools for cloud management platforms, including cloud security posture assessments.
Adding features to automate tasks at the operations level could help provide better visibility across the cloud for our operational engineers.
There is no downtime or challenges.
Umbrella's strong DNS layer security helps block malware, phishing, ransomware, and malicious domains through centralized policy management.
If Cisco can enhance integration breadth and policy flexibility, it would alleviate frustrations for teams managing a hybrid multi-vendor environment.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is straightforward and has flexible pricing based on workload consumption.
I believe has been competitively priced across the market.
The cost compared to other solutions is really cheap.
Umbrella is a high-enterprise cost product, so one should look at their budget before implementing this solution.
Although Umbrella may be priced higher, the security features, centralized management, threat protection, and ease of deployment provide good value for the investment.
The single pane of glass for multi-cloud cost optimization helps me day-to-day by bringing a lot of operational excellence; it saves a lot of time because rather than going to each and every account or multi-cloud portal, which takes a lot of time, having everything on a single pane of glass increases efficiency, delivers results in less time, and provides clear reporting that can be shared with the customer in PDF or CSV formats.
The best features CoreStack offers are primarily the recommendations for cost optimization for RDS and EC2 machines.
For example, from AWS, it provides visibility on EBS volumes that are not being used, and it gives recommendations to delete them and save some cost.
Umbrella has positively impacted my organization by allowing our IT team to know that our users and our remote locations are having safe traffic.
I am able to achieve almost net zero incidents.
The platform effectively leverages threat intelligence and automated analysis to identify and block malicious domains, phishing attempts, and emergency cyber threats.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Umbrella | 0.8% |
| CoreStack | 1.3% |
| Other | 97.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
CoreStack offers powerful FinOps and governance capabilities, automated remediation, and cost optimization recommendations in a unified interface for multi-cloud environments, enhancing compliance and boosting cloud cost efficiency by 15%.
CoreStack's comprehensive approach to cloud management supports AWS, Azure, and GCP environments. Its features streamline cost management, tagging, and resource usage, providing crucial insights for policy management and spend tracking. By aligning governance with organizational structures and offering compliance with CIS benchmarks, CoreStack delivers detailed cost insights and optimizes billing operations. This reduces cloud spending and supports BillOps for generating customer invoices. While CoreStack excels in these areas, there's potential to improve stability, scalability, and UI responsiveness. Enhanced integration with SOAR platforms and addressing XDR console challenges would also be beneficial.
What are CoreStack's key features?In industries relying on cloud infrastructure, CoreStack proves invaluable for teams managing complex, multi-cloud environments. By integrating seamlessly with AWS, Azure, and GCP, organizations in sectors like finance, healthcare, and IT enjoy enhanced governance and FinOps capabilities, reducing costs and optimizing cloud operations.
Umbrella offers a comprehensive suite designed to enhance security management across digital landscapes with precision. By effectively mitigating risks, it provides robust protection tailored to meet specific requirements.
Umbrella stands out with its potent ability to streamline risk management through advanced threat intelligence and adaptive security measures. It incorporates state-of-the-art technology that identifies and neutralizes threats before they impact critical infrastructures. Its flexibility allows easy customization, ensuring its features align with the demands of each user. Through seamless integration with existing systems, Umbrella maximizes productivity and fortifies security protocols without disrupting operations.
What features define Umbrella's effectiveness?In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Umbrella is implemented to safeguard sensitive data and maintain confidentiality. Each sector benefits from tailored features that cater to its unique security challenges, ensuring reliable protection against evolving threats.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.