

Control-M and Ivanti ITSM compete in different categories within IT management. Control-M leads in workload automation, while Ivanti ITSM excels in IT service management.
Features: Control-M offers workload automation, centralized monitoring, and complex job scheduling. Ivanti ITSM provides a robust ticketing system, change management, and service desk functionality.
Room for Improvement: Control-M can enhance reporting, user interface, and DevOps tool integration. Ivanti ITSM could improve the user interface, integration capabilities, and customer support model.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer flexible deployment options. Control-M prides itself on excellent customer support for critical issues, whereas Ivanti ITSM is criticized for a lack of robust support.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M is expensive but provides significant ROI for large enterprises due to automation and reduced operational costs. Ivanti ITSM is cost-effective for smaller businesses but may appear pricier than other solutions.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
Even when we were new to Control-M, they assisted us greatly with any integration issues or other concerns.
Ivanti is very responsive and releases new features and updates in a timely manner.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
As the workload grows, it is possible to expand the environment and manage additional processes while still maintaining centralized monitoring and control.
The solution is good and scalable, with no limitations faced in adding new devices or scaling the solution overall.
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
Regarding stability, I would give Control-M a ten.
In my experience, once workflows and jobs are properly configured, it runs reliably and handles scheduled processes consistently.
Ivanti Automation is very robust and reliable with no latency issues or glitches.
I would rate the stability from one to ten as a nine.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
There could be an improvement in the ability to easily integrate other systems without extensive development.
The user interface could be more futuristic and modernized in terms of styling and colors.
Regarding analytics and reporting in Ivanti Neurons for ITSM, I am not currently using it because I primarily use the reporting functions from the Endpoint Management tool.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
I think the pricing aspect is cost-efficient.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.
The interface, workflow, and dashboards are powerful and easy to manage for tracking KPIs and sharing strategies with our customers.
Ivanti Automation significantly simplifies IT infrastructure processes, handling access requests and facilitating various employee requests.
What I appreciate about Ivanti Neurons for ITSM is its comprehensive change request management system.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 3.2% |
| Ivanti ITSM | 1.2% |
| Other | 95.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 191 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Control-M, from BMC, provides robust orchestration capabilities for managing hybrid cloud workflows, available both on-premise and as a SaaS option. Control-M from BMC supports growing teams in automating and scheduling enterprise workload processes. Control-M serves as a versatile tool for businesses, enabling automation across diverse platforms like SAP, mainframes, and cloud environments. It simplifies job scheduling with an intuitive GUI and integrates with multiple applications and platforms. Users benefit from managed file transfers, role-based administration, and self-service portals, enhancing security and workflow management. While the platform offers comprehensive alerting, reporting, and batch impact management, feedback has highlighted areas for improvement such as more flexible job execution, enhanced reporting capabilities, and better integration with third-party tools. Additionally, licensing costs and support during upgrades are common concerns. Organizations value Control-M for its ability to facilitate secure file transfers and support business-critical operations, minimizing manual intervention and ensuring efficiency.
What are the key features of Control-M?
What benefits should you look for in Control-M reviews?
Control-M is instrumental in industries managing complex workflows and IT operations. In finance, it offers accurate real-time data processing. Supply chain sectors benefit from its orchestration capabilities to streamline operations and minimize disruption. IT departments leverage integration capabilities to optimize workflow processes, ensuring seamless application management.
Ivanti ITSM offers powerful automation with AI integration, featuring customizable service management solutions like self-service, Self Heal, service catalog, and ticketing systems, supporting incident, change, and asset management.
Ivanti ITSM combines stability, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, providing automation and AI-driven enhancements for handling incidents, changes, and assets. Users highlight its easy customization, user-friendly interface, and seamless integration with third-party tools. Notable for its patch management, endpoint visibility, and powerful workflows, Ivanti ITSM allows tailored service requests and comprehensive IT management, suitable for large and small enterprises. However, it requires enhancements for integration with non-Windows systems and some third-party tools, particularly improving self-service portal, UI, language localization, and support documentation. Configuration requirements, patching, and pricing models are also noted as areas needing refinement.
What are the standout features of Ivanti ITSM?Ivanti ITSM is implemented widely in sectors like HR and finance for digital transformation, leveraging ITIL-certified processes and customizable workflows for comprehensive service desk operations. Its integration of intelligent chatbots and central support centers addresses IT needs efficiently, favored by organizations seeking ServiceNow alternatives.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.