Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Control-M vs IBM WebSphere BPMS comparison

BMC and IBM are both solutions in the Process Automation category. BMC is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.7, while IBM is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0. BMC holds a 4.4% mindshare in PA, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Control-M
Read 121 Control-M reviews
  • 3,737 Views
  • 1,531 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
IBM WebSphere BPMS
Read 5 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews
  • 146 Views
  • 68 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

IBM WebSphere BPMS and Control-M are competing in the business process management and job scheduling market. IBM WebSphere BPMS holds an advantage in process automation, while Control-M has the upper hand in job scheduling and workload automation due to its enhanced scheduling features.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS offers advanced process management, integration capabilities, and comprehensive analytics tools. Control-M is recognized for its robust workload automation, detailed scheduling, and advanced monitoring interfaces. IBM WebSphere BPMS excels in providing tools for automating business processes extensively, whereas Control-M is known for reliable and customizable workload management.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere BPMS could improve by streamlining its deployment process and reducing the learning curve. Enhancing its integration outside IBM's ecosystem and improving customer support for non-IBM products would be beneficial. Control-M would benefit from enhanced user interfaces and more thorough integration of new technologies. Simplifying its advanced features for non-technical users could improve accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM WebSphere BPMS requires careful planning for deployment and presents a steeper learning curve but provides robust integration with IBM products. Control-M facilitates a simpler deployment process with a focus on user friendliness. Both products offer responsive customer service, yet Control-M is often praised for faster resolution times and its approachable support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS usually incurs higher initial costs but ensures substantial returns if fully utilized, suited for businesses seeking extensive automation. Control-M stands out as a more cost-effective option delivering swift implementation and faster ROI, particularly appealing for organizations aiming for efficient workload automation.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Control-M vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Control-M vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Control-M
Ranking in Process Automation
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
121
Ranking in other categories
Managed File Transfer (MFT) (4th), Workload Automation (1st)
IBM WebSphere BPMS
Ranking in Process Automation
33rd
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Control-M is 4.4%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Pedro Fuentes - PeerSpot reviewer
Cost-effective, excellent support, and centralized access and control
They have a department that handles requests for enhancements. I talked to Control-M guys back in October or November when they had a gathering here in Atlanta. We talked about not being able to go back in history in Helix Control-M for more than two weeks. We submitted a request for enhancement. They told us that they are working on it, and they are thinking of expanding that to 30 days. We would like to see it expand to 90 days, but they are working on it. In Control-M, we were able to go back 180 days, but that was on-prem. The storage of that data was on our own servers. We know that storage is money, and we do not expect them to store that much of the data, but at least 30 to 60 days seem proper.
Read full review
ST
Systematic role management and flexible integration improve efficiency, but low-code capabilities and setup complexity need addressing
The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems. The critical component is the authorization within the workflow assignment, which is an attractive aspect of this tool. It has helped us in systematic role management within the workflow. Additionally, it offers flexible integration capabilities facilitating front-end and back-end separation practices, allowing for technologies like Angular and Spring Boot ( /products/spring-boot-reviews ).
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Control-M has helped to improve our data transfers because it allows us to monitor the execution of the process. With other technologies, we cannot do that."
"The Control-M interface is good for creating, monitoring, and ensuring the delivery of files as part of our data pipeline. There's a wealth of information in both the full client, as well as the web interface that they have. Both are very easy to use and provide all the necessary material to understand how to do various tasks. The help feature is very useful and informative and everything is very easy to understand."
"Workload Archiving is a very good feature for us. It helps with our customer requirements in terms of reporting and auditing... Previously, when we didn't have any archive server, we managed the data in Control-M with man-made scripts, and we would pull the data for the last 365 days, or three or four months back. Since we installed the archiving, we have been able to pull the data, anytime and anywhere, with just one click."
"If a job fails, that development team is notified right away, which improves reliability. Previously, it was on the operators to notify the developers that their job failed, erred, or aborted. Now, it's all automated."
"Before Control-M, we didn't have a centralized view and could not view what happened in the past to determine what will happen in the future. The Gantt view that we have in Control-M is like a project view. It is nice because we sometimes have some application maintenance that we need to do. So, in a single console, we can hold the jobs for the next hour or two. We can release that job when it is finished. This is a really nice feature that we didn't have before. It is something really simple, but we didn't previously have a console where we could say, "For the next two hours, what are the jobs that we will run? And, hold these jobs not to run." This is really important."
"Helix Control-M has contributed to the overall stability of our applications and improved user experience."
"The product has enhanced the interface with a clear visual display of data and process batches, showing the completion status of workflows."
"Control-M is a bit faster compared to other solutions. The job and coding are easier."
More Control-M pros
"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
 

Cons

"Integration with some applications and platforms is complex and requires development. We have done some integration with the application integrator, but it was more like a manual solution. This is an area that can be improved."
"But for some issues, BMC will suggest to upgrade to new version which will not be feasible to standards of the organisation. Hence some work around should be shown to run the business until new version was upgraded."
"Whenever I pull an S4HANA job to the Helix Control-M tool, it pulls it naturally with all the steps. A job can have several steps, and in this case, it is very easy to control the steps taken. However, in the case of the SaaS IBP tool, it can pull the job but cannot identify the steps. So, when I want to take an action in a step, I have to split the job."
"Consider adding a mobile application for remote management."
"Control-M reporting isn't that good. It is very limited. We would like the ability to create our own reports as well as the ability to publish dashboards in the cloud, which would help us. Improved reporting will help us determine statuses and get the answers that we need. However, I personally think BMC is not focusing on the reporting. I have even visited the BMC office in India, and asked, "Why haven't you improved the reporting?""
"I would like to see more audit report templates added, and perhaps more customizability in terms of reporting."
"While they have a very good reporting facility, the reports that I'm asked to produce, a lot of times aren't necessarily what we need."
"It is a very strong product, but the reporting could be better."
More Control-M cons
"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compare to other tools Pricing and licensing was more. It should be decrease."
"Its pricing is a little bit high. They could provide an enterprise-level license for an unlimited number of jobs. Currently, it is based on the number of jobs, and if you exceed the number of jobs, there are charges. For example, if your license is for 3,000 jobs per day, but you run 3,050 jobs, you will have to pay for the extra 50 jobs. They charge $120 per job. So, it is too costly."
"Pricing can be steep, but you get what you pay for."
"Initially, our licensing model was based on the number of jobs per day. That caused some issues because we were restricted to a number. So at our renewal time we said, 'We want to convert from number of jobs to number of endpoints.' That cost us extra money but it gave us additional capabilities, without worrying about the number of jobs."
"The product price is reasonable. I rate the pricing an eight."
"They are expensive. If we were a small company, it would be complicated because we have to have strong sales and operations to be able to afford a tool of this level. Being a large company, the cost-benefit is covered, but it is not within the level of cheap solutions."
"The cost is basically $100 a job, give or take."
"The license model is based on the number of jobs we run on the SaaS application or the number of executions, unlike the on-premise model options. If we have a handful of jobs, it's always good to consider Control-M, but if it's a large number of jobs, Control-M might not be a great option."
More Control-M pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...
See all answers
What do you like most about Control-M?
First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?
It is a little bit expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere BPMS?
There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler. The tool currently involves a complex setup requirement, and having...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere BPMS?
We use IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) internally in the bank for process automation and management. Our IT department self-builds different systems to serve various use...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering IBM WebSphere BPMS?
I recommend IBM WebSphere BPMS for large enterprises concerned with total system management. It is not ideal for SMB due to its complexity and the need for significant IT resources. I rate it seven...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M Logo
AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M
Compared 16% of the time
Automic Automation vs Control-M Logo
Automic Automation vs Control-M
Compared 9% of the time
IBM Workload Automation vs Control-M Logo
IBM Workload Automation vs Control-M
Compared 7% of the time
Redwood RunMyJobs vs Control-M Logo
Redwood RunMyJobs vs Control-M
Compared 6% of the time
Stonebranch vs Control-M Logo
Stonebranch vs Control-M
Compared 5% of the time
More Control-M Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Control-M
April 2025
Control-M reportDownload Control-M product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM WebSphere BPMS
April 2025
IBM WebSphere BPMS reportDownload IBM WebSphere BPMS product report
 

Also Known As

Control M
WebSphere BPMS
 

Overview

Control-M is used for enterprise workload automation, orchestrating finance, retail, healthcare, and supply chain processes. It handles batch job scheduling, managed file transfers, cloud integrations, and compliance auditing across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.

Organizations leverage Control-M to efficiently monitor and manage business-critical processes like payroll, HR, SAP, Informatica, and database tasks. It enhances visibility, security, and error resolution. Automating and optimizing workflows in data centers, AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform, Control-M supports diverse technological environments. The platform's robust capabilities make it suitable for effective centralized management of applications and data pipelines, ensuring enhanced collaboration and scalability.

What are Control-M's most important features?
  • Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with various systems
  • Automation API: Facilitates automation through APIs
  • Managed File Transfer: Simplifies secure file transfers
  • GUI console: Intuitive graphical user interface
  • Role-based administration: Provides access control
  • Single-pane view: Centralized monitoring dashboard
  • Scheduling options: Flexible job scheduling
  • Workflow orchestration: Coordinates complex workflows
  • Reporting: Generates insightful reports
  • Monitoring: Tracks and manages tasks
  • Forecasting: Predicts future workloads
  • Self-service portal: Empowers users with self-service tools
  • Plugins: Extends functionality through additional plugins
What are the benefits or ROI of using Control-M?
  • Enhanced visibility: Centralized view of all processes
  • Ease of use: User-friendly interface
  • Error reduction: Minimizes manual errors
  • Improved collaboration: Facilitates teamwork
  • Scalability: Supports growth and scale
  • Support: Comprehensive customer support

Control-M is implemented in industries like finance to handle payroll and HR tasks, in retail for inventory management and supply chain processes, and in healthcare for compliance auditing and patient data processing. Organizations benefit from streamlined workflows and automated processes across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, ensuring efficient and secure operations.

BMC
Information not available
IBM
 

Sample Customers

CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia
Buyer's Guide
Control-M vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
April 2025
Free Report: Control-M vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
Find out what your peers are saying about Control-M vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Control-M vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.