Control-M vs IBM WebSphere BPMS comparison

BMC and IBM are both solutions in the Process Automation category. BMC is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5, while IBM is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.5. BMC holds a 4.6% mindshare in PA, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Control-M

Read 126 Control-M reviews

20,716 Views
3,315 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Read 6 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews

203 Views
203 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Control-M

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

IBM WebSphere BPMS and Control-M are competing in the business process management and job scheduling market. IBM WebSphere BPMS holds an advantage in process automation, while Control-M has the upper hand in job scheduling and workload automation due to its enhanced scheduling features.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS offers advanced process management, integration capabilities, and comprehensive analytics tools. Control-M is recognized for its robust workload automation, detailed scheduling, and advanced monitoring interfaces. IBM WebSphere BPMS excels in providing tools for automating business processes extensively, whereas Control-M is known for reliable and customizable workload management.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere BPMS could improve by streamlining its deployment process and reducing the learning curve. Enhancing its integration outside IBM's ecosystem and improving customer support for non-IBM products would be beneficial. Control-M would benefit from enhanced user interfaces and more thorough integration of new technologies. Simplifying its advanced features for non-technical users could improve accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM WebSphere BPMS requires careful planning for deployment and presents a steeper learning curve but provides robust integration with IBM products. Control-M facilitates a simpler deployment process with a focus on user friendliness. Both products offer responsive customer service, yet Control-M is often praised for faster resolution times and its approachable support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS usually incurs higher initial costs but ensures substantial returns if fully utilized, suited for businesses seeking extensive automation. Control-M stands out as a more cost-effective option delivering swift implementation and faster ROI, particularly appealing for organizations aiming for efficient workload automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Control-M vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Control-M

Ranking in Process Automation

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

126

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (3rd), Workload Automation (1st)

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Ranking in Process Automation

28th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Control-M is 4.6%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Ujjwal Sachdeva

Data scientist at Advarisk

Efficient automation and boosted workflow but needs better integration methods

Control-M is a bit faster compared to other solutions. The job and coding are easier. Also, my DevOps and Ops teams work collaboratively with it, enhancing its efficiency. The workflow is much easier compared to the ACS services we were using. Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.

Read full review

ChandraBollini

Software Engineer at Wipro Technologies

Developers gain flexibility to build custom controls with numerous integration options

Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases. Regarding AI-driven process optimizations, we have not implemented these features with IBM WebSphere BPMS. In recent versions, IBM has introduced some generative AI features, and we plan to migrate to the newer versions within approximately one year.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is an enterprise tool that integrates with all the applications in our organization. It has made our life easier because we don't need to wake up at midnight and do monitoring, etc. It does everything. It also sends precautionary alerts. If a job or activity is running for more than the specified time, it alerts the application team. So, our teams do not need to sit in front of a laptop or any open application to watch the jobs. They can do their other regular activities while Control-M takes care of all the jobs. It notifies them when there is job completion, delay, and error."

"Control-M has enabled true enterprise batch automation, which combined with the other BMC Control products on our mainframe platform, allows us to run a 24/7 site with the lights out."

"It is very easy to use. The HA feature is also very good."

"As soon as you have an issue, a ticket is created and the tech support is quite responsive."

"I would definitely recommend Control-M to every institute because it is extremely helpful to manage every task without any manual error."

"The most valuable features are the managing of file transfers and the product keeping up with technology."

"I am proud to say almost all of the banks in South Africa are using it."

"By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency."

More Control-M pros

"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."

"IBM WebSphere BPMS provides significant return on investments, especially in the BAW component."

"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."

"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."

"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."

Cons

"The stability could be improved. I ran into an issue with a recent Control-M patch. The environment would become unstable if security ports were scanned. This is an area they need to improve on, but ultimately it's a relatively small improvement."

"I would like to see more auditing capabilities. Right now, it has the basics and I've been trying to set those up to work with what our auditors are looking for."

"The reporting functionality needs a lot of work. We have faced problems with different versions where we run the right report, but it gives us blank entries. Then, when we run the same report again, it gives the correct data."

"It is a very strong product, but the reporting could be better."

"Everybody's biggest gripe is the reporting capability option. It is a gripe because there is a lot of information in Control-M, but the solution doesn't have a good reporting tool to extract that information. Now, if you want all that information, you need to rely on another third-party BI tool to extract the information out of Control-M."

"Whenever I pull an S4HANA job to the Helix Control-M tool, it pulls it naturally with all the steps. A job can have several steps, and in this case, it is very easy to control the steps taken. However, in the case of the SaaS IBP tool, it can pull the job but cannot identify the steps. So, when I want to take an action in a step, I have to split the job."

"Its installation can be better. Currently, we have to install it manually. The file transfer feature can also be improved. It is not very easy to transfer a file from business to business. In terms of new features, they can include new technologies. It can have API integration."

"The next major release needs to focus on the lightweight web client."

More Control-M cons

"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."

"The solution lacks acceptable stability."

"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."

"Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases."

"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They are expensive. If we were a small company, it would be complicated because we have to have strong sales and operations to be able to afford a tool of this level. Being a large company, the cost-benefit is covered, but it is not within the level of cheap solutions."

"BMC does NOT have a great licensing model from my perspective."

"The price is right because of the licensing schema, which is based on nodes and processes. You purchase what you use, no more and no less, and you can grow with time."

"Licensing costs are around $3000 a year."

"This product saves hours in a day based on my experience working here versus other companies with manually operations."

"This is an expensive product compared to other solutions, although I think that it is a good one. We are in a good position with licensing, as we can run 10,000 jobs."

"Initially, our licensing model was based on the number of jobs per day. That caused some issues because we were restricted to a number. So at our renewal time we said, 'We want to convert from number of jobs to number of endpoints.' That cost us extra money but it gave us additional capabilities, without worrying about the number of jobs."

"This is now from my previous years as support for banks and big companies. If it's not enterprise scale, I find that it's too expensive for smaller companies. You really have to be quite big and need to have a dedicated support staff to run it, then you'll be fine. What we've seen at smaller companies, it's too expensive because they want to automate everything. Now, stuff that can literally run once a day for the rest of their lives is costing them $3 a job a day. It becomes too expensive, eventually. They are not seeing the return on investment because it's not business critical. Nobody is going to die or they're going to lose money if that job didn't run exactly at 11 minutes past 4:00. It's definitely for bigger enterprise companies, especially banks or healthcare providers. We have had an instance where Control-M was unavailable due to external factors for 20 minutes and there was a loss of almost a million euros because the solution involved logistics."

More Control-M pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Control-M?

First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?

Its cost can be more competitive. One of the main things customers look at is the cost. It's not affordable. The cost is very high, according to my customers. The licensing cost is very high, and t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere BPMS?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere BPMS?

IBM WebSphere BPMS allows users to build workflows and dashboards. It is a developer-friendly product. The product features a great UI interface that is mobile-friendly, tab-friendly, and desktop-f...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM WebSphere BPMS?

Understanding the benefits and improvements that come with using the product is essential. IBM WebSphere BPMS is performing excellently, and I do not see any significant areas requiring improvement...

See all answers

Comparisons

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 13% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Control-M

Compared 8% of the time

Automic Automation vs Control-M

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 6% of the time

Stonebranch vs Control-M

Compared 5% of the time

More Control-M Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Control-M

August 2025

Download Control-M product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere BPMS

August 2025

Download IBM WebSphere BPMS product report

Also Known As

Control M

WebSphere BPMS

Interactive Demo

BMC

Demo not available

IBM

Overview

Control-M by BMC offers orchestration for hybrid cloud workflows, starting at $29,000 annually. It's designed for teams managing dependencies efficiently with automation and scheduling capabilities.

Control-M is known for its automation, integration, and scheduling capabilities. It provides a user-friendly GUI for seamless third-party application integration and robust file transfer capabilities. Role-based administration features, self-service portals, and the ability to handle complex workflows enhance operational efficiency. Its control modules enable diverse integrations, while forecasting, monitoring, and alerting functionalities improve reliability and adaptability across platforms, making it essential for orchestrating tasks efficiently.

What are Control-M's key features?

User-Friendly GUI: Offers intuitive interface for easy navigation.
Seamless Third-Party Integration: Facilitates smooth interaction with other tools.
Robust File Transfer: Ensures reliable and secure data movement.
Role-Based Administration: Enhances security and access control.
Self-Service Portal: Enables users to manage tasks independently.
Forecasting and Monitoring: Provides predictive insights for better planning.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes and reduces manual tasks.
Improved Reliability: Minimizes errors with automated workflows.
Real-Time Insights: Offers visibility into job performance and system status.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs.
Integration Flexibility: Supports diverse applications and environments.

Control-M is vital in industries like financial services, data management, and IT operations. It automates batch processing, job automation, and file transfers, supporting applications such as SAP, Oracle, and Informatica. This enhances transparency, reduces errors, and provides insights into job performance and system status.

BMC

Information not available

IBM

Sample Customers

CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc

Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS

July 2025

Free Report: Control-M vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS

Find out what your peers are saying about Control-M vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Control-M vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.