Confluent vs SAP Replication Server comparison

The compared Confluent and SAP solutions aren't in the same category. Confluent is ranked #7 in SA , with an average rating of 7.3, and holds a 6.6% mindshare in the category. SAP is ranked #21 in DDM , and holds a 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Confluent users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Confluent

Read 25 Confluent reviews

5,930 Views
3,439 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

SAP Replication Server

Read 7 SAP Replication Server reviews

3,081 Views
832 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Confluent

SAP Replication Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Confluent and SAP Replication Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Microsoft, Apache and others in Streaming Analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Streaming Analytics Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Streaming Analytics

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Confluent

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Streaming Analytics (7th)

SAP Replication Server

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (21st), Data Integration (52nd)

Mindshare comparison

Confluent and SAP Replication Server aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Confluent is designed for Streaming Analytics and holds a mindshare of 6.6%, down 8.3% compared to last year.
SAP Replication Server, on the other hand, focuses on Database Development and Management, holds 1.9% mindshare, up 1.0% since last year.

Streaming Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Confluent	6.6%
Apache Flink	7.9%
Databricks	7.8%
Other	77.7%

Streaming Analytics

Database Development and Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAP Replication Server	1.9%
Oracle Enterprise Manager	4.1%
Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials	4.1%
Other	89.9%

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

PavanManepalli

AVP - Sr Middleware Messaging Integration Engineer at Wells Fargo

Has supported streaming use cases across data centers and simplifies fraud analytics with SQL-based processing

I recommend that Confluent should improve its solution to keep up with competitors in the market, such as Solace and other upcoming tools such as NATS. Recently, there has been a lot of buzz about Confluent charging high fees while not offering features that match those of other tools. They need to improve in that direction by not only reducing costs but also providing better solutions for the problems customers face to avoid frustrations, whether through future enhancement requests or ensuring product stability. The cost should be worked on, and they should provide better solutions for customers. Solutions should focus on hierarchical topics; if a customer has different types of data and sources, they should be able to send them to the same place for analytics. Currently, Confluent requires everything to send to the same topic, which becomes very large and makes running analytics difficult. The hierarchy of topics should be improved. This part is available in MQ and other products such as Solace, but it is missing in Confluent, leading many in capital markets and trading to switch to Solace. In terms of stability, it is not the stability itself that needs improvement but rather the delivery semantics. Other products offer exactly-once delivery out of the box, whereas Confluent states it will offer this but lacks the knobs or levers for tuning configurations effectively. Confluent has hundreds of configurations that application teams must understand, which creates a gap. Users are often unaware of what values to set for better performance or to achieve exactly-once semantics, making it difficult to navigate through them. Delivery semantics also need to be worked on.

Read full review

GagandeepSingh3

Principal Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Good at handling replication, provides cross-database replication but SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies

SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies. The product supports Oracle, but I am not aware of what other technologies it supports. If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution can handle a high volume of data because it works and scales well."

"Some of the best features are that it's very quick to set up, very easy to have a centralized area that gives us a history of changes, and the ability to give feedback on any information placed onto the pages."

"Their tech support is amazing; they are very good, both on and off-site."

"The most valuable feature that we are using is the data replication between the data centers allowing us to configure a disaster recovery or software. However, is it's not mandatory to use and because most of the features that we use are from Apache Kafka, such as end-to-end encryption. Internally, we can develop our own kind of product or service from Apache Kafka."

"A person with a good IT background and HTML will not have any trouble with Confluent."

"Implementing Confluent's schema registry has significantly enhanced our organization's data quality assurance."

"We primarily use Confluent for service desk and task management, and it is also good for knowledge base management."

"The benefit is escaping email communication. Sometimes people ignore emails or put them into spam, but with Confluence, everyone sees the same text at the same time."

More Confluent pros

"Currently, there is a Hadoop-based infrastructure with several engineers to maintain the data, and now, using SAP Replication Server, it has become automatic and requires fewer people to put data in the data warehouse."

"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."

"It's pretty good at handling replication, even under high load. It also provides cross-database replication, for example, from Sybase to Oracle."

"We use this solution for all kinds of communications like RFC, BAPI, IDoc, connecting with the orders, accounts, finance, data stuff, banking, everything."

"This product has a catalog with the location of all the objects which were replicated, and it's very simple to maintain."

"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."

"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."

"The most valuable thing about this product is that it replicates data between SAP databases (ASE to IQ) very successfully."

More SAP Replication Server pros

Cons

"Currently, in the early stages, I see a gap on the security side. If you are using the SaaS version, we would like to get a fuller, more secure solution that can be adopted right out of the box. Confluence could do a better job sharing best practices or a reusable pattern that others have used, especially for companies that can not afford to hire professional services from Confluent."

"It could be improved by including a feature that automatically creates a new topic and puts failed messages."

"Areas for improvement include implementing multi-storage support to differentiate between database stores based on data age and optimizing storage costs."

"It requires some application specific connectors which are lacking. This needs to be added."

"They should remove Zookeeper because of security issues."

"Recently, there has been a lot of buzz about Confluent charging high fees while not offering features that match those of other tools."

"The pricing model should include the ability to pick features and be charged for them only."

"The product should integrate tools for incorporating diagrams like Lucidchart. It also needs to improve its formatting features. We also faced issues while granting permissions."

More Confluent cons

"There is a need to improve performance in high transactional processes."

"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."

"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing and faster support."

"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."

"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."

"It's a very expensive solution."

"It's complex. It's necessary to understand a little about infrastructure, like network LAN and VLAN environment."

"Setup was a little complex."

More SAP Replication Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model of Confluent could improve because if you have a classic use case where you're going to use all the features there is no plan to reduce the features. You should be able to pick and choose basic services at a reduced price. The pricing was high for our needs. We should not have to pay for features we do not use."

"The solution is cheaper than other products."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is low pricing and ten is high pricing, I would rate Confluent's pricing at five. I have not encountered any additional costs."

"Confluent is expensive, I would prefer, Apache Kafka over Confluent because of the high cost of maintenance."

"Confluent is highly priced."

"Confluent is an expensive solution as we went for a three contract and it was very costly for us."

"Confluence's pricing is quite reasonable, with a cost of around $10 per user that decreases as the number of users increases. Additionally, it's worth noting that for teams of up to 10 users, the solution is completely free."

"It comes with a high cost."

More Confluent pricing and cost advice

"You can pick one of the hosted cloud services as opposed to owning it and doing it yourself. Your cost of ownership on the hardware, the data storage, and the maintenance all go down. It depends on what service you use."

"It's a very expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Retailer

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Confluent?

They charge a lot for scaling, which makes it expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Confluent?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Confluent?

The main use cases for Confluent are log aggregation and streaming. I'm familiar with Confluent stream processing with KSQL. KSQL helps in terms of data analytics strategies because if we are the d...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Palantir Foundry vs Confluent

Compared 11% of the time

Databricks vs Confluent

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Stream Analytics vs Confluent

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon Kinesis vs Confluent

Compared 6% of the time

PubSub+ Platform vs Confluent

Compared 5% of the time

More Confluent Competitors

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 6% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Replication Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Confluent

June 2026

Download Confluent product report

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

June 2026

Download SAP Replication Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sybase Replication Server

Overview

Confluent offers scalable, open-source flexibility and seamless data replication, supported by strong cloud integration. Key features like Kafka Connect and real-time processing make it valuable for data streaming projects while ensuring high availability with a Multi-Region Cluster.

Confluent is a robust data streaming platform that enables efficient management and integration of real-time data pipelines. Its message-driven architecture and fault tolerance provide reliability, while a user-friendly dashboard and connectors support diverse data sources. Cloud integration reduces costs, and extensive documentation, plugins, and monitoring capabilities enhance collaboration and revision management. Despite some areas needing improvement, including security in the SaaS version and integration flexibility, Confluent remains a staple in industries requiring vast data processing and task automation.

What are Confluent's key features?

Scalability: Handles large volumes of data, ensuring continuous performance.
Kafka Connect: Enables seamless data integration across multiple systems.
Real-time Processing: Facilitates instant data insights for rapid decision-making.
Multi-Region Cluster: Maintains data availability across different geographical locations.
Cloud Integration: Reduces operational costs and enhances deployment flexibility.
User Dashboard: Simplifies management with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?

Cost-Efficiency: Improved processes reduce operational expenses.
Data Reliability: Ensures consistent and accurate data handling.
Increased Collaboration: Boosts team efficiency with comprehensive documentation and management tools.
Scalability: Supports business growth without compromising performance.
Integration Flexibility: Seamlessly connects with diverse data sources and systems.

Confluent is commonly implemented in finance, insurance, and software industries for applications like fraud detection, ETL tasks, and enterprise communication. It supports real-time data processing, project management, and task automation, often integrating with project management tools like Jira, providing valuable solutions for business processes.

Confluent

SAP Replication Server offers enhanced data replication for SAP databases with customizable workflows, real-time updates, improved efficiency, and seamless integration with external tools, catering to both private and hybrid cloud solutions.

SAP Replication Server facilitates effective cross-database replication, including Sybase to Oracle, while enhancing performance with reduced storage use. Despite its robust reliability and beginner-friendly setup, areas such as high transactional processing and cross-database integration to newer technologies require improvement. Integration with HANA and addressing high private instance costs are necessary. The platform supports heterogeneous database communication and is a valuable asset in finance, banking, and analytics across platforms like AWS, Azure, and IBM.

What features does SAP Replication Server offer?

Customizable Workflows: Tailor workflows to meet business domain modeling needs.
Real-Time Replication: Ensure database updates are replicated instantly.
Cross-Database Support: Facilitate data movement between Sybase, Oracle, and more.
Warm Standby: Allows seamless read/write access during failover.
Easy Setup: Access beginner-friendly setup with comprehensive online resources.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces storage needs and enhances performance.
Robust Reliability: Ensures dependable data replication processes.
Cross-Platform Integration: Works well with modern platforms for a diverse tech stack.
Business Continuity: Maintains operations with features like Warm Standby.

Organizations in data analytics, finance, and banking sectors utilize SAP Replication Server to streamline database replication and communication, optimizing processes across AWS, Azure, and IBM. Employee data replication for payroll and business management is simplified, supporting hybrid cloud deployments.

SAP

Sample Customers

ING, Priceline.com, Nordea, Target, RBC, Tivo, Capital One, Chartboost

Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone

Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Microsoft, Apache and others in Streaming Analytics. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.