Confluent vs SAP Replication Server comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Confluent and SAP solutions aren't in the same category. Confluent is ranked #9 in SA , with an average rating of 7.0, and holds a 6.2% mindshare in the category. SAP is ranked #21 in DDM , and holds a 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Confluent users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Confluent

Read 25 Confluent reviews

6,572 Views
3,877 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

SAP Replication Server

Read 7 SAP Replication Server reviews

4,099 Views
1,107 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Confluent

SAP Replication Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Confluent and SAP Replication Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Microsoft, Apache and others in Streaming Analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Streaming Analytics Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Streaming Analytics

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Confluent

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Streaming Analytics (9th)

SAP Replication Server

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (21st), Data Integration (55th)

Mindshare comparison

Confluent and SAP Replication Server aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Confluent is designed for Streaming Analytics and holds a mindshare of 6.2%, down 8.5% compared to last year.
SAP Replication Server, on the other hand, focuses on Database Development and Management, holds 1.8% mindshare, up 1.3% since last year.

Streaming Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Confluent	6.2%
Databricks	7.4%
Apache Flink	6.9%
Other	79.5%

Streaming Analytics

Database Development and Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAP Replication Server	1.8%
Oracle Enterprise Manager	4.3%
Oracle Coherence	3.8%
Other	90.1%

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

PavanManepalli

AVP - Sr Middleware Messaging Integration Engineer at Wells Fargo

Has supported streaming use cases across data centers and simplifies fraud analytics with SQL-based processing

I recommend that Confluent should improve its solution to keep up with competitors in the market, such as Solace and other upcoming tools such as NATS. Recently, there has been a lot of buzz about Confluent charging high fees while not offering features that match those of other tools. They need to improve in that direction by not only reducing costs but also providing better solutions for the problems customers face to avoid frustrations, whether through future enhancement requests or ensuring product stability. The cost should be worked on, and they should provide better solutions for customers. Solutions should focus on hierarchical topics; if a customer has different types of data and sources, they should be able to send them to the same place for analytics. Currently, Confluent requires everything to send to the same topic, which becomes very large and makes running analytics difficult. The hierarchy of topics should be improved. This part is available in MQ and other products such as Solace, but it is missing in Confluent, leading many in capital markets and trading to switch to Solace. In terms of stability, it is not the stability itself that needs improvement but rather the delivery semantics. Other products offer exactly-once delivery out of the box, whereas Confluent states it will offer this but lacks the knobs or levers for tuning configurations effectively. Confluent has hundreds of configurations that application teams must understand, which creates a gap. Users are often unaware of what values to set for better performance or to achieve exactly-once semantics, making it difficult to navigate through them. Delivery semantics also need to be worked on.

Read full review

GagandeepSingh3

Principal Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Good at handling replication, provides cross-database replication but SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies

SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies. The product supports Oracle, but I am not aware of what other technologies it supports. If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The biggest benefit of Confluent as a tool is that it is a distributed platform that provides more durability and stability."

"Overall, it's a great company and they have excellent software."

"With Confluent Cloud we no longer need to handle the infrastructure and the plumbing, which is a concern for Confluent, and the other advantage is that all portfolios have access to the data that is being shared."

"Kafka Connect framework is valuable for connecting to the various source systems where code doesn't need to be written."

"As an enterprise organization, data availability is critical and Confluent provides that SLA support."

"The benefit is escaping email communication. Sometimes people ignore emails or put them into spam, but with Confluence, everyone sees the same text at the same time."

"We mostly use the solution's message queues and event-driven architecture."

"Their tech support is amazing; they are very good, both on and off-site."

More Confluent pros

"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."

"It's pretty good at handling replication, even under high load. It also provides cross-database replication, for example, from Sybase to Oracle."

"This product has a catalog with the location of all the objects which were replicated, and it's very simple to maintain."

"The most valuable thing about this product is that it replicates data between SAP databases (ASE to IQ) very successfully."

"We can customize any workflow and we also like the business domain modeling that can be done."

"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."

"Currently, there is a Hadoop-based infrastructure with several engineers to maintain the data, and now, using SAP Replication Server, it has become automatic and requires fewer people to put data in the data warehouse."

"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."

More SAP Replication Server pros

Cons

"Confluence could improve the server version of the solution. However, most companies are going to the cloud."

"Currently, in the early stages, I see a gap on the security side. If you are using the SaaS version, we would like to get a fuller, more secure solution that can be adopted right out of the box. Confluence could do a better job sharing best practices or a reusable pattern that others have used, especially for companies that can not afford to hire professional services from Confluent."

"The Schema Registry service could be improved. I would like a bigger knowledge base of other use cases and more technical forums. It would be good to have more flexible monitoring features added to the next release as well."

"Confluent is expensive, I would prefer, Apache Kafka over Confluent because of the high cost of maintenance."

"It could be more user-friendly and centralized. A way to reduce redundancy would be helpful."

"It could have more themes. They should also have more reporting-oriented plugins as well. It would be great to have free custom reports that can be dispatched directly from Jira."

"It could be improved by including a feature that automatically creates a new topic and puts failed messages."

"It requires some application specific connectors which are lacking. This needs to be added."

More Confluent cons

"It's a very expensive solution."

"There is a need to improve performance in high transactional processes."

"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."

"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing and faster support."

"If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those."

"It's complex. It's necessary to understand a little about infrastructure, like network LAN and VLAN environment."

"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."

"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."

More SAP Replication Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Confluent has a yearly license, which is a bit high because it's on a per-user basis."

"The pricing model of Confluent could improve because if you have a classic use case where you're going to use all the features there is no plan to reduce the features. You should be able to pick and choose basic services at a reduced price. The pricing was high for our needs. We should not have to pay for features we do not use."

"The solution is cheaper than other products."

"Confluence's pricing is quite reasonable, with a cost of around $10 per user that decreases as the number of users increases. Additionally, it's worth noting that for teams of up to 10 users, the solution is completely free."

"Confluent is an expensive solution as we went for a three contract and it was very costly for us."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is low pricing and ten is high pricing, I would rate Confluent's pricing at five. I have not encountered any additional costs."

"Confluent is an expensive solution."

"It comes with a high cost."

More Confluent pricing and cost advice

"It's a very expensive solution."

"You can pick one of the hosted cloud services as opposed to owning it and doing it yourself. Your cost of ownership on the hardware, the data storage, and the maintenance all go down. It depends on what service you use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Retailer

12%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

22%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Confluent?

They charge a lot for scaling, which makes it expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Confluent?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Confluent?

The main use cases for Confluent are log aggregation and streaming. I'm familiar with Confluent stream processing with KSQL. KSQL helps in terms of data analytics strategies because if we are the d...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Palantir Foundry vs Confluent

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Stream Analytics vs Confluent

Compared 7% of the time

Databricks vs Confluent

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Kinesis vs Confluent

Compared 6% of the time

Apache Spark Streaming vs Confluent

Compared 6% of the time

More Confluent Competitors

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

SSIS vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 4% of the time

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP Replication Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Confluent

October 2026

Download Confluent product report

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

October 2026

Download SAP Replication Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sybase Replication Server

Overview

Confluent offers scalable, open-source flexibility and seamless data replication, supported by strong cloud integration. Key features like Kafka Connect and real-time processing make it valuable for data streaming projects while ensuring high availability with a Multi-Region Cluster.

Confluent is a robust data streaming platform that enables efficient management and integration of real-time data pipelines. Its message-driven architecture and fault tolerance provide reliability, while a user-friendly dashboard and connectors support diverse data sources. Cloud integration reduces costs, and extensive documentation, plugins, and monitoring capabilities enhance collaboration and revision management. Despite some areas needing improvement, including security in the SaaS version and integration flexibility, Confluent remains a staple in industries requiring vast data processing and task automation.

What are Confluent's key features?

Scalability: Handles large volumes of data, ensuring continuous performance.
Kafka Connect: Enables seamless data integration across multiple systems.
Real-time Processing: Facilitates instant data insights for rapid decision-making.
Multi-Region Cluster: Maintains data availability across different geographical locations.
Cloud Integration: Reduces operational costs and enhances deployment flexibility.
User Dashboard: Simplifies management with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?

Cost-Efficiency: Improved processes reduce operational expenses.
Data Reliability: Ensures consistent and accurate data handling.
Increased Collaboration: Boosts team efficiency with comprehensive documentation and management tools.
Scalability: Supports business growth without compromising performance.
Integration Flexibility: Seamlessly connects with diverse data sources and systems.

Confluent is commonly implemented in finance, insurance, and software industries for applications like fraud detection, ETL tasks, and enterprise communication. It supports real-time data processing, project management, and task automation, often integrating with project management tools like Jira, providing valuable solutions for business processes.

Confluent

SAP Replication Server offers enhanced data replication for SAP databases with customizable workflows, real-time updates, improved efficiency, and seamless integration with external tools, catering to both private and hybrid cloud solutions.

SAP Replication Server facilitates effective cross-database replication, including Sybase to Oracle, while enhancing performance with reduced storage use. Despite its robust reliability and beginner-friendly setup, areas such as high transactional processing and cross-database integration to newer technologies require improvement. Integration with HANA and addressing high private instance costs are necessary. The platform supports heterogeneous database communication and is a valuable asset in finance, banking, and analytics across platforms like AWS, Azure, and IBM.

What features does SAP Replication Server offer?

Customizable Workflows: Tailor workflows to meet business domain modeling needs.
Real-Time Replication: Ensure database updates are replicated instantly.
Cross-Database Support: Facilitate data movement between Sybase, Oracle, and more.
Warm Standby: Allows seamless read/write access during failover.
Easy Setup: Access beginner-friendly setup with comprehensive online resources.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces storage needs and enhances performance.
Robust Reliability: Ensures dependable data replication processes.
Cross-Platform Integration: Works well with modern platforms for a diverse tech stack.
Business Continuity: Maintains operations with features like Warm Standby.

Organizations in data analytics, finance, and banking sectors utilize SAP Replication Server to streamline database replication and communication, optimizing processes across AWS, Azure, and IBM. Employee data replication for payroll and business management is simplified, supporting hybrid cloud deployments.

SAP

Sample Customers

ING, Priceline.com, Nordea, Target, RBC, Tivo, Capital One, Chartboost

Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone

Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Microsoft, Apache and others in Streaming Analytics. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.