We performed a comparison between Comodo cWatch and Imperva DDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Microsoft, Akamai and others in CDN."The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue."
"The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."
"Technical support was very helpful."
"They're quite easy to install and quite easy to set up. Clients really like that. Especially when you're dealing with the cloud, it's really easy."
"The complete solution is valuable for everything it delivers and the protection it offers."
"Imperva DDoS is fairly stable, and its availability is quite high."
"It's very pretty easy to onboard the URL."
"We use Imperva DDoS to stop DDoS attacks and reduce the amount of unwanted queries against web services or web scraping."
"The setup of Imperva DDoS was easy."
"Its unique interface for managing security performance and ease of use are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources."
"A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed."
"We had an issue when securing the web applications for DDoS protection."
"I would like to see automated reporting to improve visibility."
"The log analytics interface within Incapsula isn't really good. For example, if you have to get all logs from there, it's a very cumbersome process."
"Users would benefit from better documentation. There is official documentation, but sometimes we need more detail. We have some use cases that are not so run of the mill. It would be great if there was a knowledge base that we could go to for more answers."
"It would be beneficial to include vulnerability management in the solution, similar to what they have for their on-premise solution."
"I would like to have support for SSL management and secure DNS."
"It needs to be improved every time there are new attacks."
"The cost could be lower; our end clients need to have a high budget to purchase this solution."
Earn 20 points
Comodo cWatch is ranked 19th in CDN while Imperva DDoS is ranked 5th in CDN with 74 reviews. Comodo cWatch is rated 9.6, while Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Comodo cWatch writes "Excellent security, good encryption, and pretty stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". Comodo cWatch is most compared with Cloudflare, Atomic ModSecurity Rules, Sucuri and AWS WAF, whereas Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF.
See our list of best CDN vendors and best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.