We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and F5 BIG-IQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"The backup, monitoring and logging are the best features."
"The reporting feature is quite good."
"We use this solution on a daily basis, and it is very stable."
"Scalability: To move from larger boxes to smaller boxes, along with virtualization. So, we are not locked into a particular size."
"The GUI is fine, at least from an engineer's perspective."
"F5 BIG-IQ reduces the propensity for error."
"Features like AFM, the gateway, and Global DNS are the coolest features that save work for us."
"The most valuable features are load balancing and WAF."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"The solution should improve pricing. It's expensive in comparison to other American solutions."
"F5 BIG-IQ should improve by being a complete certificate management solution because currently, it is only for Venafi. Other automation platforms, should be added."
"They could use YAML or JSON if they wanted to make it a little bit easier for us."
"The solution's rSeries has been made free, and iSeries should be made free as well."
"Integration with VAS is something that they need to work on."
"Sometimes the solution does not work."
"The shell, kernel, or Linux has something like a delay, especially with the Virtual Edition, when you are trying to implement it in the cloud and you want to access it remotely with web management. It would be great if they could improve their kernel. It was difficult for me, especially when I got started with BIG-IP. I was struggling to find which commands work with it. If you want to work with it, you have to be a Linux guy."
"I had trouble with high availability deployment in my environment."
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 33rd in Process Automation while F5 BIG-IQ is ranked 23rd in Process Automation with 12 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while F5 BIG-IQ is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of F5 BIG-IQ writes "A central management system to manage and monitor a bunch of different BIG-IP devices". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas F5 BIG-IQ is most compared with ServiceNow Orchestration. See our Comindware Tracker vs. F5 BIG-IQ report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
