


Code42 Incydr and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint are both robust cybersecurity solutions with unique strengths catering to different needs. Based on user reviews, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has an edge in features and ease of deployment, whereas Code42 Incydr excels in support and pricing.
Features: Code42 Incydr users value its comprehensive data protection, recovery capabilities, and incident response streamlining. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users appreciate its advanced threat detection, automated investigation features, and extensive security functionalities.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest that Code42 Incydr enhance its integration with other systems, simplify analytics tools, and improve the interface. For Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, improvements could include better compatibility with non-Microsoft environments, reduced complexity, and enhanced user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Code42 Incydr is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer support, making it accessible for organizations with limited IT resources. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, while powerful, can be challenging to deploy and configure.
Pricing and ROI: Code42 Incydr is considered cost-effective with favorable pricing and solid return on investment. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, despite a higher price point, is valued for its extensive feature set and perceived long-term benefits.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
Without detection and protection measures, organizations would face substantial payments and reputational damage, including the necessity to inform customers about data breaches, potentially leading to loss of business.
We have seen a return on investment when using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, as it saves labor by reducing the need for staff to focus on it.
The biggest return on investment for me when using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is the time saving.
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection eases the workload through automation, through policies and rules that are pre-configured to handle complex tasks that would take hours and days for a team to initiate.
With Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection, our investigation time for high-risk incidents has been cut in half, and overall management now takes us less than four hours a week.
There have been scenarios where we have stopped users from sharing data, and that data has been successfully protected from leaving the premises, adding tremendous value for us.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
The Microsoft agent, who did not actually work for Microsoft, is one of the vendors that Microsoft uses for support, said, 'Just to set expectations, my lunch break is in an hour and I am going to go away then.'
The level-one support seems disconnected from subject matter experts.
I rate Microsoft support 10 out of 10.
I would rate the customer support a perfect 10.
I have never had any problems with the customer support, and they are very responsive.
They resolve issues according to their established SLA.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
We managed to scale it out in a short amount of time, with two months of planning and three months of implementation on 10,000 computers.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is scalable enough to handle various devices across environments, whether they are laptops, Android devices, or operating in hybrid environments.
Compatibility is its main feature.
The tool effectively detected both malware and spam, ensuring that only a few emails categorized as malware reached user mailboxes.
I would rate the scalability of Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection around 9.5, as it is highly scalable and widely used by many organizations, including large enterprises.
As the organization grows, Mimecast scales its cloud resources to handle increased demand.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be trusted completely.
I haven't seen any outages with Microsoft.
I rate Defender 10 out of 10 for stability.
Defender for Endpoint is extremely stable.
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is stable in my experience.
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is definitely stable without fail based on my experience.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Repeated interactions are necessary due to Level One's lack of tools and knowledge, hindering efficient problem-solving and negatively impacting our experience with Microsoft support.
In contrast, competing products offer reduced pricing for long-term commitments, which makes it difficult for us in that environment.
We use Microsoft partners to help govern the platform, and as part of an alliance, we want to gather data from each tenant and combine them for a complete view.
If Mimecast could provide more information about how they store the data and whether the agents are local agents or cloud-hosted agents, that would be of great help for the organizations to consider its AI capabilities while adhering to the compliance needs of a particular organization.
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection should incorporate features to detect if a URL is malicious or generated by AI, especially since many attackers use scripts to bypass mail gateways.
The policies are solid, they work effectively, the implementation time is not very long, integrations with SIEM are quite easy, and the Glassbreak account is something I have tested.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Compared to CrowdStrike, which is very costly, and SentinelOne, which is also very costly, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a medium cost-efficient solution.
That has been the trend we have seen with Microsoft lately—it is just getting more and more expensive.
Given our extensive Microsoft licensing, transitioning to Defender for Endpoint did not affect licensing costs.
It costs $15 per VM for the P2 plan, which is seen as affordable for customers.
The setup cost is a one-time investment that will stay with us forever.
After migrating, the cost is almost a 50% discount.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that pricing is always very expensive.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
Defender for Endpoint's coverage across different platforms in our environment is pretty good. We have devices running Linux, Mac OS, Windows, iOS, and Android. It covers all of them.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides a unified management interface allowing customers to manage their on-premises and hybrid infrastructures from a single pane.
One of the best features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is its database for identifying zero-day attacks or malware attacks.
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection has positively impacted our organization as it has helped us identify a lot of phishing emails and stopped many unauthorized disclosures or accidental disclosures of information.
The second thing is that the alert getting triggered is very fast. There is no latency issue that we have observed.
If you want to secure your communication through email, you have to deploy Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection in your network infrastructure.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 6.7% |
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 5.8% |
| SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint | 4.6% |
| Other | 82.9% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection | 2.7% |
| Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention | 6.1% |
| Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention | 4.6% |
| Other | 86.6% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 54 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 82 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 45 |
| Large Enterprise | 96 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 29 |
| Large Enterprise | 44 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides comprehensive threat protection that integrates well with current systems, offering proactive threat detection and automatic updates while reducing manual efforts.
The platform is designed for seamless integration with Microsoft products, facilitating efficient management and use. It offers proactive ransomware protection and valuable threat intelligence, crucial for timely response and increased visibility across devices. Users highlight its ability to secure endpoints from viruses and malware, integrating with Windows and Office 365 to enhance real-time detection capabilities in diverse environments, including hybrid and on-premises setups. However, enhancements are needed in Linux integration, detection accuracy, and policy implementations.
What are the key features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is implemented across industries for securing endpoints, relying on its deep integration with Windows and Office 365 to protect against malware and viruses. Organizations benefit from its real-time detection and comprehensive management capabilities, particularly in hybrid environments where diverse digital infrastructures need safeguarding.
Mimecast Incydr protects organizations against insider risk and data exfiltration, whether accidental, negligent, or malicious. It monitors endpoint, cloud, browser, and email activity to see when files move to places you don't trust, without requiring policies, proxies, or content classification to work. Administrators get a single dashboard for data flow visibility, adaptive controls ranging from education to blocking, and integrations with HR, endpoint detection, and identity systems to automate response as risk changes.
What key features should users explore?
What benefits can impact ROI?
Industries and use cases
Mimecast Incydr is used across industries to address insider risk, departing employee data theft, and shadow AI exposure. Enterprises use it to monitor data movement across endpoint, cloud, and browser channels, automate watchlisting during employee offboarding, and gain visibility into how employees and AI tools interact with sensitive data, supporting both security operations and compliance requirements in regulated industries.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.