CMW Tracker and KiSSFLOW are competing in the workflow automation solutions category. KiSSFLOW seems to have the upper hand in deployment simplicity, while CMW Tracker is stronger in customization options according to user reviews.
Features: CMW Tracker provides robust customization features, supporting complex workflows and integrations, and making it suitable for organizations with specific needs. It offers a wide range of configurations and business rules without requiring coding skills, which can be delegated to business users for creating tailored workflows. Additionally, it includes a clean user interface and remote access from mobile browsers. KiSSFLOW offers a straightforward approach with easily implementable workflows designed for rapid deployment. The solution provides flexible integration capabilities, including APIs for connections to multiple applications like DocuSign and Salesforce. The drag-and-drop functionality allows for quick customization of workflows, while the visual boards enhance workflow management and modifications with ease.
Room for Improvement: CMW Tracker could benefit from reducing the complexity of its initial setup, especially for on-premises deployments, and enhancing its cloud capabilities to match user preferences for cloud-based solutions. Users have noted that simplifying its learning curve would also be an advantage. Increasing out-of-the-box integrations with more third-party applications could further improve CMW Tracker's appeal. KiSSFLOW could improve by expanding its advanced customization options beyond the current drag-and-drop and no-code features, providing more templates for diverse industries. Enhancing the support for more complex workflow management scenarios and strengthening its reporting and analytics features are suggested areas for improvement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: KiSSFLOW's cloud-based model allows quick implementation, supported by comprehensive onboarding and customer service, resulting in faster deployment. CMW Tracker, often implemented on-premises, may require more extensive initial setup and support. However, it can offer a customized support experience per user reviews, which can offset its more involved deployment process.
Pricing and ROI: CMW Tracker might require a higher initial investment due to its extensive customization features, but it potentially delivers higher long-term ROI for businesses with unique operational needs. KiSSFLOW offers more accessible pricing and lower initial costs, which can lead to rapid ROI through efficiency gains and reduced setup expenses, making it a cost-effective choice for those seeking immediate implementation.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| KiSSFLOW | 0.6% |
| CMW Tracker | 0.4% |
| Other | 99.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
CMW Tracker offers a browser-accessible workflow management platform supporting low code development with features such as team collaboration and excellent customer service. Users value its affordability and ability to enhance transparency and standardize processes.
CMW Tracker streamlines project management by allowing non-technical users to create workflows, manage tasks, and synchronize tools efficiently. This platform emphasizes ease of deployment and modification, bringing transparency and clarity to processes while enabling workflow automation. Its user-friendly design, robust analytics, and cost-effectiveness make it a favored choice for organizations needing efficient workflow management.
What are the main features of CMW Tracker?CMW Tracker is widely implemented across industries requiring efficient workflow management, particularly in settings where collaboration and process transparency are critical. Organizations benefit from its ability to standardize operations, reduce IT dependency, and enhance service delivery by enabling seamless communication among dispersed team members working on joint projects.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
