CloverETL vs Tungsten RPA comparison

The compared Javlin and Tungsten Automation solutions aren't in the same category. Javlin is ranked #58 in DI , and holds a 0.8% mindshare in the category. Tungsten Automation is ranked #8 in RPA , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Javlin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Tungsten Automation users who would recommend it.

CloverETL

Read 2 CloverETL reviews

2,406 Views
1,468 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tungsten RPA

Read 27 Tungsten RPA reviews

4,851 Views
2,862 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

CloverETL

Tungsten RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, Palantir and others in Data Integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,948 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (58th), Data Visualization (35th)

Tungsten RPA

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

CloverETL and Tungsten RPA aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. CloverETL is designed for Data Integration and holds a mindshare of 0.8%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
Tungsten RPA, on the other hand, focuses on Robotic Process Automation (RPA), holds 1.8% mindshare, down 2.2% since last year.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CloverETL	0.8%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)	3.8%
SSIS	3.7%
Other	91.7%

Data Integration

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tungsten RPA	1.8%
UiPath Platform	9.9%
Microsoft Power Automate	6.2%
Other	82.1%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

it_user856614

Lead Programmer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them, however we run out heap space even with a high allocation

Flexibility: We can bring in data from multiple sources, e.g., databases, text files, JSON, email, XML, etc. This has been very helpful Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility. Server features for scheduler: It is…

Read full review

Jamil Milhem

Project Manager-Senior RPA Specialist at DEWA

Automates browsing tasks without needing a server connection

I have worked with Microsoft Power Platform and UiPath. Kofax RPA offers a comprehensive solution with built-in capabilities for executing tasks like running Excel files and web automation without additional servers. They provide their browsers and extensions. For functions such as OCR, image processing, and data extraction, Kofax has built-in features powered by their engine, eliminating the need for subscriptions to external technologies like Microsoft Cognitive Services or Google Search. One of Kofax RPA's strongest features is its on-premise solution, which is particularly beneficial for organizations operating in regions with data regulations, such as the UAE.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"No dependence on native language and ease of use."

"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."

"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."

"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."

"We switched to CloverETL because of its flexibility to connect to various data sources and no dependence on native language and ease of use."

"Familiar, intuitive GUI coming from a Java development background, in-depth, descriptive, and well-laid-out documentation, responsive support through forums directly from Clover staff, a wealth of customizable pre-defined components, descriptive logging for error messages, and ease of install with a light footprint make it very effective to use."

"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept; it's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated, and if you take the whole package with the extra products you can digitize it using RPA and also by using the other products they provide."

"It is stable and scalable."

"I would definitely recommend this solution."

"It is a stable product."

"The most valuable feature is the robotic process."

"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."

"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."

"The pricing of the solution is quite good."

More Tungsten RPA pros

Cons

"Needs easier automated failure recovery, more and more intuitive auto-generated or filled-in code for components, and easier or more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."

"Its documentation could be improved."

"Other than that, I think that there are other tools on the market which may be better to work with for automation."

"The negative side is that UiPath has a really large community on the RPA side, and Tungsten RPA doesn't have any community for the developer side, which is a red flag for us and for customers."

"We've faced a few challenges with Tungsten RPA. One issue I recall was with sending emails that needed multiple attachments. At the time, the feature only allowed attaching one file at a time. We discussed this with Tungsten RPA, and they planned to add multi-attachment capability to their backlog. I'm not sure if it's been upgraded since then. The solution's desktop automation is tricker."

"The product has some constraints and performance issues."

"The HR and IT areas of the product need to be improved."

"Concatenation of error messages."

"The process discovery could be a bit better."

"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."

More Tungsten RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The normal price for an on-premises license is €50,000. That's the price for one robot license. You can have more than one robot license but only one can be run at any one time. I believe the cost of adding a second robot is around €14,000."

"Its pricing is reasonable given the product capabilities. Kofax has a wide range of products, and it can sometimes be confusing to understand which capabilities come with which product set. One of the key facets that we've been looking into recently is cognitive document recognition that was a core pile of some of their other technologies such as Kofax transformation modules (KTM)."

"Kofax RPA's licensing costs are yearly and expensive."

"I don't have complete insight at this point in time, but I would guess that Kofax is a lot less expensive than Automation Anywhere. I would expect its license to be on a yearly basis."

"The cost depends on the number of licenses and the number of RPAs."

"The solution’s license is not expensive."

"Kofax's prices are pretty reasonable."

"Price is not a problem, because they are a competitor and we have a special rate."

More Tungsten RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

26%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kofax RPA?

I am not a user of Tungsten RPA; I sell this product for our company.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kofax RPA?

The negative side is that UiPath has a really large community on the RPA side, and Tungsten RPA doesn't have any community for the developer side, which is a red flag for us and for customers.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kofax RPA?

Tungsten RPA reduces manual work, especially in financial services and HR solutions.

See all answers

Comparisons

SSIS vs CloverETL

Compared 9% of the time

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 9% of the time

ViaSQL by Adaptigent vs CloverETL

Compared 8% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs CloverETL

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs CloverETL

Compared 6% of the time

More CloverETL Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 15% of the time

ibi Open Data Hub for Mainframe vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 6% of the time

Blue Prism vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 5% of the time

ABBYY Vantage vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 5% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 5% of the time

More Tungsten RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

August 2026

Download CloverETL product report

Buyer's Guide

Tungsten RPA

July 2026

Download Tungsten RPA product report

Also Known As

No data available

Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow

Overview

CloverETL is a data integration and transformation tool tailored for businesses seeking efficient data processing capabilities. It is known for its ability to automate complex data workflows, making it an essential asset for IT departments.

With its focus on flexibility and efficiency, CloverETL enables businesses to streamline data management processes. It supports data integration, transformation, and orchestration across diverse platforms. Users find it particularly valuable in scenarios involving large-scale data processing, where automated data pipeline management is crucial.

What are the most important features of CloverETL?

Data Transformation: Efficiently alters data formats to meet system needs.
ETL Automation: Streamlines workflows with robust automated processes.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data demands seamlessly.
Cross-Platform Connectivity: Integrates easily across multiple data sources.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Reduced Operational Costs: Automation decreases manual intervention-related expenses.
Improved Data Consistency: Ensures accurate and reliable data across systems.
Enhanced Productivity: Saves time with faster data transformations.

In industries like finance and healthcare, CloverETL is implemented to manage and analyze large volumes of data. Its capability to adapt to industry-specific requirements makes it an effective choice for businesses aiming to enhance their data operational efficiency.

Javlin

Tungsten RPA offers a sophisticated automation platform designed for seamless integration with enterprise systems. It's known for its robust functionalities in document processing, web automation, and delivering efficient business workflows.

Designed to streamline complex operations, Tungsten RPA supports integrations with major platforms like SAP and ERP tools, known for enhancing business efficiency. It provides powerful OCR capabilities and is characterized by a low-code environment, which simplifies automation tasks. Despite its strengths, there's a need for improvements in community support, documentation, and emerging AI functionalities. Expanding its desktop automation, scalability, and system connections, especially with Microsoft and Citrix, is imperative for broader adoption.

What are the key features of Tungsten RPA?

Third-Party Integrations: Seamlessly connects with systems like SAP and ERP for streamlined operations.
Low-Code Platform: Simplifies automation with easy-to-use programming and deployment options.
OCR Capabilities: Processes low-DPI documents effectively for accurate data extraction.
Web Automation: Streamlines repetitive web-based tasks and browser interactions.
Modular Structure: Facilitates efficient management of business processes and workflows.

Why consider Tungsten RPA for automation?

Comprehensive Automation: Reduces manual workload with reliable execution of repetitive tasks.
Enhanced Efficiency: Increases productivity by automating intricate processes.
Robust Error Handling: Minimizes disruptions with efficient error management strategies.
Flexibility: Adapts to specific business requirements with customizable components.
Low Development Time: Speeds up project timelines due to its low-code nature.

Tungsten RPA is employed across sectors like finance, healthcare, aviation, and logistics for automating crucial business functions. It aids in automating repetitive tasks, data extraction, and process automation in ERP and SharePoint systems. Businesses leverage its capabilities for website automation, handling employee data, and streamlining operations in finance and HR. It enhances customer service operations, document processing, and market data collection, effectively reducing manual workload and boosting operational efficiency.

Tungsten Automation

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA

Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita

Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, Palantir and others in Data Integration. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.