CloverETL vs Tungsten RPA comparison

The compared Javlin and Tungsten Automation solutions aren't in the same category. Javlin is ranked #60 in DI , and holds a 0.2% mindshare in the category. Tungsten Automation is ranked #12 in RPA , with an average rating of 7.6, and holds a 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Javlin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Tungsten Automation users who would recommend it.

CloverETL

Read 2 CloverETL reviews

430 Views
241 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tungsten RPA

Read 26 Tungsten RPA reviews

2,806 Views
1,627 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

CloverETL

Tungsten RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CloverETL vs. Tungsten RPA Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. Tungsten RPA

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,803 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (60th), Data Visualization (40th)

Tungsten RPA

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

CloverETL and Tungsten RPA aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. CloverETL is designed for Data Integration and holds a mindshare of 0.2%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
Tungsten RPA, on the other hand, focuses on Robotic Process Automation (RPA), holds 1.7% mindshare, down 2.2% since last year.

Data Integration

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

it_user856614

Lead Programmer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them, however we run out heap space even with a high allocation

Flexibility: We can bring in data from multiple sources, e.g., databases, text files, JSON, email, XML, etc. This has been very helpful Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility. Server features for scheduler: It is…

Read full review

Jamil Milhem

Project Manager-Senior RPA Specialist at DEWA

Automates browsing tasks without needing a server connection

I have worked with Microsoft Power Platform and UiPath. Kofax RPA offers a comprehensive solution with built-in capabilities for executing tasks like running Excel files and web automation without additional servers. They provide their browsers and extensions. For functions such as OCR, image processing, and data extraction, Kofax has built-in features powered by their engine, eliminating the need for subscriptions to external technologies like Microsoft Cognitive Services or Google Search. One of Kofax RPA's strongest features is its on-premise solution, which is particularly beneficial for organizations operating in regions with data regulations, such as the UAE.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."

"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."

"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."

"No dependence on native language and ease of use."

"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."

"The most valuable feature is the robotic process."

"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."

"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."

"Initially, the most effective features for process automation were website automation related to web auditing, SharePoint implementations, and automated management of information."

"The pricing of the solution is quite good."

"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."

"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."

More Tungsten RPA pros

Cons

"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."

"Its documentation could be improved."

"Automation with the latest websites is not effective. The support of newer websites developed using new technologies would improve this solution."

"The process discovery could be a bit better."

"Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular."

"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."

"Its documentation is not widely available on the web. They should work on the availability of its documentation. In Automation Anywhere, there is a feature called Discovery Bot that automatically records the process steps and suggests a possible bot. I am not sure if such a feature is available in Kofax. If it is not available, it will be very good to have this feature. "

"There is really nothing special about the capabilities of this product."

"The solution could use some AI integrated features."

"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."

More Tungsten RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I give the price of the solution a six out of ten."

"The solution’s license is not expensive."

"The normal price for an on-premises license is €50,000. That's the price for one robot license. You can have more than one robot license but only one can be run at any one time. I believe the cost of adding a second robot is around €14,000."

"Kofax RPA is moderately priced but expensive in comparison to UiPath and Power Automate."

"Price is not a problem, because they are a competitor and we have a special rate."

"The pricing model for automation solutions like Automation Anywhere, UiPath, and Microsoft Power Platform is subscription-based, where costs are calculated based on factors such as the number of hours used and the scale of automation required.......With Kofax, you purchase a license upfront, and that's all you need. You can create as many automation workflows as you require without additional costs for individual use cases."

"Its pricing is reasonable given the product capabilities. Kofax has a wide range of products, and it can sometimes be confusing to understand which capabilities come with which product set. One of the key facets that we've been looking into recently is cognitive document recognition that was a core pile of some of their other technologies such as Kofax transformation modules (KTM)."

"I don't have complete insight at this point in time, but I would guess that Kofax is a lot less expensive than Automation Anywhere. I would expect its license to be on a yearly basis."

More Tungsten RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Kofax RPA?

You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kofax RPA?

The pricing models across the market initially differed significantly, as most RPA implementations were licensed on a per bot basis, unlike Tungsten RPA, which uses a server-based model. Though the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kofax RPA?

Automation of complex processes involving stable legacy systems could be a major plus. The biggest issue lies in the stability of the target environment. Automating systems based on Citrix, where u...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAS Visual Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 100% of the time

More CloverETL Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 41% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 11% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 10% of the time

Tungsten TotalAgility vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 9% of the time

Blue Prism vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 6% of the time

More Tungsten RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

July 2025

Download CloverETL product report

Buyer's Guide

Tungsten RPA

June 2025

Download Tungsten RPA product report

Also Known As

No data available

Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow

Overview

CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.

Javlin

Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.

Tungsten Automation

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA

Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. Tungsten RPA

July 2025

Free Report: CloverETL vs. Tungsten RPA

Find out what your peers are saying about CloverETL vs. Tungsten RPA and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloverETL vs. Tungsten RPA report.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.