CloverETL vs SnapLogic comparison

Javlin and SnapLogic are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Javlin is ranked #65, while SnapLogic is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.3. Javlin holds a 0.2% mindshare in DI, compared to SnapLogic’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Javlin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SnapLogic users who would recommend it.

CloverETL

Read 2 CloverETL reviews

203 Views
145 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SnapLogic

Read 24 SnapLogic reviews

2,288 Views
1,395 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

CloverETL

SnapLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

CloverETL and SnapLogic are data integration platforms. SnapLogic seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and easier deployment process.

Features: CloverETL provides a data transformation engine, customizable integration processes, and flexibility for technical users. SnapLogic offers advanced connectivity, multi-cloud support, and scalability, focusing on rapid deployment and ease of integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloverETL requires technical knowledge for deployment and features dedicated service channels. SnapLogic provides an intuitive deployment process with guides and prompt customer service, making it accessible for users.

Pricing and ROI: CloverETL has lower setup costs, presenting high ROI through its cost-efficient model. SnapLogic requires a higher initial investment, balanced by its advanced features that deliver significant ROI for extensive integration needs.

To learn more, read our detailed CloverETL vs. SnapLogic Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. SnapLogic

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL

Ranking in Data Integration

65th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Visualization (39th)

SnapLogic

Ranking in Data Integration

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (16th), Cloud Data Integration (12th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of CloverETL is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SnapLogic is 1.4%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

it_user856614

Lead Programmer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them, however we run out heap space even with a high allocation

Flexibility: We can bring in data from multiple sources, e.g., databases, text files, JSON, email, XML, etc. This has been very helpful Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility. Server features for scheduler: It is…

Read full review

VinethSuresh

Senior Data Analyst at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Achieves rapid results in data migration and has an intuitive user interface

I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL. The interface is interactive, allowing me to quickly learn how to run pipelines and achieve production-ready results swiftly. This agility translates to cost savings, especially for smaller projects and proofs of concept, as less time and effort are needed to deliver results.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."

"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."

"No dependence on native language and ease of use."

"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."

"SnapLogic is a great platform for establishing integrations among various systems or patterns by using any kind of interface. If something is not supported by predefined snaps – snaps are connectors in SnapLogic – you can create them (custom snaps) or write a script."

"SnapLogic is an IPA tool that leverages a low code environment to connect to multiple sources, extract data, and store it in Azure data lake."

"The technical support from SnapLogic is excellent, and I would give it a complete ten."

"The solutions ability to connect "snaps" or components to the graphic user interface is very intuitive, prevents errors, and makes implementations easy."

"What I found most valuable in SnapLogic is the ETL feature, particularly the Transform Snap Pack, for example, any kind of reading or writing on Transform Snaps. Other than that, all the third-party connectivity tools such as the SAP Snap Pack, Salesforce Snap Pack, Workday Snap Pack, even the ServiceNow Snap Pack, I find all those are pretty useful in SnapLogic."

"SnapLogice is a low-code development tool."

"I found SnapLogic valuable and what I found most valuable about it was its ETL feature. I also found its automation feature valuable. It can be used for automating manual activities. It can be used as a middleware for certain transactional data processing and minimal datasets and ETL activities."

"It is a stable solution."

More SnapLogic pros

Cons

"Its documentation could be improved."

"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."

"I would like to see more performance-related dashboards, ones that display the cost of a pipeline, for instance. Also, it would be helpful to have management dashboards for overseeing pipelines and connections."

"One of the areas for improvement in SnapLogic is that the connectors for some of the applications should be more available in terms of testing in the dev environment. Another area for improvement is that the logging should be standardized, for example, the integration with an ELK stack should be required out-of-the-box, so you can ship the log and have it in the ELK stack. There should be integration with ELK stack for the log shipping."

"They should expand in terms of features for SaaS-based market requirements in different sectors."

"The solution isn't ideal for complex processing or logic. We use another solution for that."

"SnapLogic should have some inbuilt protocol mechanism in order to speed up."

"One area for improvement in SnapLogic is the transparency in the flow of data. It needs to have more transparency. Right now, users only have a preview option at the end of any job flow, so at the end of any Snap Pack, there is a data preview option that lets you review the data and see how it's moving. What would make the solution better is more debugging and more access to change data from the preview panel or more functionality in terms of the preview option."

"While it performs well, there is some room for improvement in this area."

"While new features are always welcome, I do not have anything else at the top of my mind currently."

More SnapLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"They have pricing/usage tiers that are easy to move up or down."

"The license model is based on consumption."

"By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."

"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."

"It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."

"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."

"SnapLogic's price is high compared to the other tools available in the market."

"The pricing is okay."

More SnapLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about SnapLogic?

Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SnapLogic?

I am quite happy with the solution and do not have specific requirements at the moment. I tend to frequently communicate with SnapLogic to ask for additional features, and they have been responsive...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SnapLogic?

I mainly use it for data integration and some API tasks.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

AWS Glue vs SnapLogic

Compared 16% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs SnapLogic

Compared 6% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs SnapLogic

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SnapLogic

Compared 6% of the time

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs SnapLogic

Compared 5% of the time

More SnapLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

June 2025

Download CloverETL product report

Buyer's Guide

SnapLogic

May 2025

Download SnapLogic product report

Also Known As

No data available

DataFlow

Overview

CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.

Javlin

The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.

SnapLogic

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA

Adobe, ADP, BlackBerry, Bonobos, Box, Capital One, Dannon, Eero, Endo, Gensler, HCL, HP, Grovo, HIS, iRobot, Leica, Merck, Sans, Target, Verizon, Vodafone, Yelp, Yahoo!

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. SnapLogic

May 2025

Free Report: CloverETL vs. SnapLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about CloverETL vs. SnapLogic and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloverETL vs. SnapLogic report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.