No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloverETL vs SnapLogic comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL
Ranking in Data Integration
61st
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Data Visualization (34th)
SnapLogic
Ranking in Data Integration
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (4th), API Management (4th), Cloud Data Integration (5th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of CloverETL is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SnapLogic is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SnapLogic1.5%
CloverETL0.7%
Other97.8%
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

it_user856614 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Programmer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them, however we run out heap space even with a high allocation
Flexibility: We can bring in data from multiple sources, e.g., databases, text files, JSON, email, XML, etc. This has been very helpful Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility. Server features for scheduler: It is…
AR
Integration Consultant at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
Low-code integrations have automated workflows and save time across enterprise applications
They can enhance the error handling and debugging part. Troubleshooting complex pipeline failures can be time-consuming. We are spending a lot of time on error handling. More detailed error messages and root cause analysis tools can be added, which will definitely improve the developer experience. In the Ultra real-time integrations, we can monitor the last execution history of only 100 runs. That can be increased, which would be one of the platform improvements that can really be taken. However, they are doing very well because lots of ChatGPTs and AI assistants have been added in the last two years, which makes a very good effect. SnapLogic is the only platform that provides this kind of visibility to the developers. Anyone, even if they have low experience and are starting their IT careers, can directly jump in and learn SnapLogic. The documentation is very easy to learn. Anyone, even a layman, can refer to that documentation and go through its Snap-pack to understand what configuration has to be done to use this Snap-pack. This makes SnapLogic definitely exceptional in the market. You won't find such comprehensive documentation in other iPaaS tools. The draggable packs truly demonstrate its power in usability. Governance and security are also well in place in SnapLogic, but there are areas for improvement. They can add more granular role and permission controls that provide greater flexibility for large enterprises. For example, if you have to provide access to 70 users in one shot, that can be improved. More improvements in policy enforcement capabilities are possible as well. SnapLogic can improve the data lineage part to achieve better end-to-end visibility into data movement. Also, during validation, we can only see up to 2,000 records currently. They can increase that from 2,000 to 20,000. They can put more visibility on costs and resource visibility, with better reporting on platform usage, processing consumption, and cost optimization opportunities.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We switched to CloverETL because of its flexibility to connect to various data sources and no dependence on native language and ease of use."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use.​​"
"Familiar, intuitive GUI coming from a Java development background, in-depth, descriptive, and well-laid-out documentation, responsive support through forums directly from Clover staff, a wealth of customizable pre-defined components, descriptive logging for error messages, and ease of install with a light footprint make it very effective to use."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"The vendor handles the maintenance of the solution"
"The solution has solved many problems for our customers and has improved their operations."
"SnapLogic is a great platform for establishing integrations among various systems or patterns by using any kind of interface. If something is not supported by predefined snaps – snaps are connectors in SnapLogic – you can create them (custom snaps) or write a script."
"SnapLogic has positively impacted my organization by aiding in the collection and transformation of various data and supporting future analytics and financial topics."
"SnapLogic has impacted my organization positively because many of the automations we made with dragging and dropping files used to be done by a human, so now there is less human error and it saves the team as it requires fewer people to do the work."
"SnapLogic has positively impacted my organization by costing a lot less than our previous ETLs, saving about 50 percent of our running costs without having done anything, just by using SnapLogic."
"The solution could improve its API management."
"Using SnapLogic saves a lot of time when we develop pipelines, and importing data from Excel systems, especially when dealing with thousands of records, takes minimal time, which improves customer satisfaction as professional services teams successfully migrate legacy products to the latest ones."
 

Cons

"​Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough.​"
"Needs easier automated failure recovery, more and more intuitive auto-generated or filled-in code for components, and easier or more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"Its documentation could be improved.​"
"As for SnapLogic's AI capabilities regarding accuracy and reliability of output, I can say we currently have eighty percent reliability and accuracy, which I think is good, and it would be better if we could improve more, but currently it is eighty percent from my perspective."
"I would like to see more performance-related dashboards, ones that display the cost of a pipeline, for instance. Also, it would be helpful to have management dashboards for overseeing pipelines and connections."
"Every tool has some advantages and there are some other things that need improvement."
"The setup cost would be four or five. There would be only one point of improvement if the price could be lower."
"The changes in the UI and the way things keep moving around mean that a level of stability would help achieve a higher adoption ratio."
"The biggest issue we have faced in our company with SnapLogic is regarding the EDI format"
"The solution isn't ideal for complex processing or logic. We use another solution for that."
"I do not have much idea on how SnapLogic can be improved, but UI-wise, if the user interface is improved to be more user-friendly, it would be more helpful."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"SnapLogic's price is high compared to the other tools available in the market."
"The pricing is okay."
"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."
"I used the free trial."
"From the ROI perspective, the price is extremely high"
"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."
"The license model is based on consumption."
"The cost with SnapLogic is an annual license and better than Informatica."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
26%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise17
Large Enterprise32
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with SnapLogic?
I think SnapLogic can be improved by implementing more seamless logging of information. Currently, this is done through an error, but it would be best to have logging available on each snap that yo...
What is your primary use case for SnapLogic?
My main use case for SnapLogic is integration with other systems, and I also use SnapLogic to replace a lot of our older systems that require integration. A specific integration I set up with SnapL...
What advice do you have for others considering SnapLogic?
My advice for others looking into using SnapLogic is to anticipate a learning curve regarding the features currently available, as there are many ways to accomplish various tasks. It is best to tak...
 

Also Known As

No data available
DataFlow
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA
Adobe, ADP, BlackBerry, Bonobos, Box, Capital One, Dannon, Eero, Endo, Gensler, HCL, HP, Grovo, HIS, iRobot, Leica, Merck, Sans, Target, Verizon, Vodafone, Yelp, Yahoo!
Find out what your peers are saying about CloverETL vs. SnapLogic and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.