CloverETL vs Confluent comparison

The compared Javlin and Confluent solutions aren't in the same category. Javlin is ranked #57 in DI , and holds a 0.8% mindshare in the category. Confluent is ranked #6 in SA , with an average rating of 7.5, and holds a 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Javlin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Confluent users who would recommend it.

CloverETL

Read 2 CloverETL reviews

1,766 Views
1,060 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Confluent

Read 25 Confluent reviews

5,327 Views
2,930 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

CloverETL

Confluent

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Confluent based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CloverETL vs. Confluent Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. Confluent

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (57th), Data Visualization (31st)

Confluent

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Streaming Analytics (6th)

Mindshare comparison

CloverETL and Confluent aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. CloverETL is designed for Data Integration and holds a mindshare of 0.8%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
Confluent, on the other hand, focuses on Streaming Analytics, holds 6.6% mindshare, down 8.2% since last year.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CloverETL	0.8%
SSIS	3.7%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)	3.6%
Other	91.9%

Data Integration

Streaming Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Confluent	6.6%
Apache Flink	8.9%
Databricks	8.1%
Other	76.4%

Streaming Analytics

Featured Reviews

it_user856614

Lead Programmer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them, however we run out heap space even with a high allocation

Flexibility: We can bring in data from multiple sources, e.g., databases, text files, JSON, email, XML, etc. This has been very helpful Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility. Server features for scheduler: It is…

Read full review

PavanManepalli

AVP - Sr Middleware Messaging Integration Engineer at Wells Fargo

Has supported streaming use cases across data centers and simplifies fraud analytics with SQL-based processing

I recommend that Confluent should improve its solution to keep up with competitors in the market, such as Solace and other upcoming tools such as NATS. Recently, there has been a lot of buzz about Confluent charging high fees while not offering features that match those of other tools. They need to improve in that direction by not only reducing costs but also providing better solutions for the problems customers face to avoid frustrations, whether through future enhancement requests or ensuring product stability. The cost should be worked on, and they should provide better solutions for customers. Solutions should focus on hierarchical topics; if a customer has different types of data and sources, they should be able to send them to the same place for analytics. Currently, Confluent requires everything to send to the same topic, which becomes very large and makes running analytics difficult. The hierarchy of topics should be improved. This part is available in MQ and other products such as Solace, but it is missing in Confluent, leading many in capital markets and trading to switch to Solace. In terms of stability, it is not the stability itself that needs improvement but rather the delivery semantics. Other products offer exactly-once delivery out of the box, whereas Confluent states it will offer this but lacks the knobs or levers for tuning configurations effectively. Confluent has hundreds of configurations that application teams must understand, which creates a gap. Users are often unaware of what values to set for better performance or to achieve exactly-once semantics, making it difficult to navigate through them. Delivery semantics also need to be worked on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."

"Familiar, intuitive GUI coming from a Java development background, in-depth, descriptive, and well-laid-out documentation, responsive support through forums directly from Clover staff, a wealth of customizable pre-defined components, descriptive logging for error messages, and ease of install with a light footprint make it very effective to use."

"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."

"No dependence on native language and ease of use."

"We switched to CloverETL because of its flexibility to connect to various data sources and no dependence on native language and ease of use."

"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."

"We primarily use Confluent for service desk and task management, and it is also good for knowledge base management."

"Confluent facilitates the messaging tasks with Kafka, streamlining our processes effectively."

"The most valuable is its capability to enhance the documentation process, particularly when creating software documentation."

"The documentation process is fast with the tool."

"Some of the best features are that it's very quick to set up, very easy to have a centralized area that gives us a history of changes, and the ability to give feedback on any information placed onto the pages."

"Confluent is an amazing tool that is highly configurable, integrates very well with Jira, and lets you create nice documentation for various products while also supporting reporting and online content hosting."

"The client APIs are the most valuable feature."

"One of the best features of Confluent is that it's very easy to search and have a live status with Jira."

More Confluent pros

Cons

"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."

"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"Its documentation could be improved."

"Needs easier automated failure recovery, more and more intuitive auto-generated or filled-in code for components, and easier or more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"The Schema Registry service could be improved. I would like a bigger knowledge base of other use cases and more technical forums. It would be good to have more flexible monitoring features added to the next release as well."

"The pricing model should include the ability to pick features and be charged for them only."

"Confluent has fallen behind in being the tool of the industry. It's taking second place to things such as Word and SharePoint and other office tools that are more dynamic and flexible than Confluent."

"It would be great if the knowledge based documents in the support portal could be available for public use as well."

"Areas for improvement include implementing multi-storage support to differentiate between database stores based on data age and optimizing storage costs."

"There is a limitation when it comes to seamlessly importing Microsoft documents into Confluent pages, which can be inconvenient for users who frequently work with Microsoft Office tools and need to transition their content to Confluent."

"We continuously face issues, such as Kafka being down and slow responses from the support team."

"Recently, there has been a lot of buzz about Confluent charging high fees while not offering features that match those of other tools."

More Confluent cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"You have to pay additional for one or two features."

"Confluent is an expensive solution as we went for a three contract and it was very costly for us."

"The pricing model of Confluent could improve because if you have a classic use case where you're going to use all the features there is no plan to reduce the features. You should be able to pick and choose basic services at a reduced price. The pricing was high for our needs. We should not have to pay for features we do not use."

"It comes with a high cost."

"Confluent has a yearly license, which is a bit high because it's on a per-user basis."

"Regarding pricing, I think Confluent is a premium product, but it's hard for me to say definitively if it's overly expensive. We're still trying to understand if the features and reduced maintenance complexity justify the cost, especially as we scale our platform use."

"The solution is cheaper than other products."

"Confluence's pricing is quite reasonable, with a cost of around $10 per user that decreases as the number of users increases. Additionally, it's worth noting that for teams of up to 10 users, the solution is completely free."

More Confluent pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

27%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

15%

Retailer

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	17

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Confluent?

They charge a lot for scaling, which makes it expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Confluent?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Confluent?

The main use cases for Confluent are log aggregation and streaming. I'm familiar with Confluent stream processing with KSQL. KSQL helps in terms of data analytics strategies because if we are the d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 11% of the time

SSIS vs CloverETL

Compared 10% of the time

ViaSQL by Adaptigent vs CloverETL

Compared 9% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs CloverETL

Compared 8% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs CloverETL

Compared 7% of the time

More CloverETL Competitors

Palantir Foundry vs Confluent

Compared 12% of the time

Databricks vs Confluent

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon Kinesis vs Confluent

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Flink vs Confluent

Compared 7% of the time

PubSub+ Platform vs Confluent

Compared 5% of the time

More Confluent Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

May 2026

Download CloverETL product report

Buyer's Guide

Confluent

May 2026

Download Confluent product report

Overview

CloverETL is a data integration and transformation tool tailored for businesses seeking efficient data processing capabilities. It is known for its ability to automate complex data workflows, making it an essential asset for IT departments.

With its focus on flexibility and efficiency, CloverETL enables businesses to streamline data management processes. It supports data integration, transformation, and orchestration across diverse platforms. Users find it particularly valuable in scenarios involving large-scale data processing, where automated data pipeline management is crucial.

What are the most important features of CloverETL?

Data Transformation: Efficiently alters data formats to meet system needs.
ETL Automation: Streamlines workflows with robust automated processes.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data demands seamlessly.
Cross-Platform Connectivity: Integrates easily across multiple data sources.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Reduced Operational Costs: Automation decreases manual intervention-related expenses.
Improved Data Consistency: Ensures accurate and reliable data across systems.
Enhanced Productivity: Saves time with faster data transformations.

In industries like finance and healthcare, CloverETL is implemented to manage and analyze large volumes of data. Its capability to adapt to industry-specific requirements makes it an effective choice for businesses aiming to enhance their data operational efficiency.

Javlin

Confluent offers scalable, open-source flexibility and seamless data replication, supported by strong cloud integration. Key features like Kafka Connect and real-time processing make it valuable for data streaming projects while ensuring high availability with a Multi-Region Cluster.

Confluent is a robust data streaming platform that enables efficient management and integration of real-time data pipelines. Its message-driven architecture and fault tolerance provide reliability, while a user-friendly dashboard and connectors support diverse data sources. Cloud integration reduces costs, and extensive documentation, plugins, and monitoring capabilities enhance collaboration and revision management. Despite some areas needing improvement, including security in the SaaS version and integration flexibility, Confluent remains a staple in industries requiring vast data processing and task automation.

What are Confluent's key features?

Scalability: Handles large volumes of data, ensuring continuous performance.
Kafka Connect: Enables seamless data integration across multiple systems.
Real-time Processing: Facilitates instant data insights for rapid decision-making.
Multi-Region Cluster: Maintains data availability across different geographical locations.
Cloud Integration: Reduces operational costs and enhances deployment flexibility.
User Dashboard: Simplifies management with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?

Cost-Efficiency: Improved processes reduce operational expenses.
Data Reliability: Ensures consistent and accurate data handling.
Increased Collaboration: Boosts team efficiency with comprehensive documentation and management tools.
Scalability: Supports business growth without compromising performance.
Integration Flexibility: Seamlessly connects with diverse data sources and systems.

Confluent is commonly implemented in finance, insurance, and software industries for applications like fraud detection, ETL tasks, and enterprise communication. It supports real-time data processing, project management, and task automation, often integrating with project management tools like Jira, providing valuable solutions for business processes.

Confluent

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA

ING, Priceline.com, Nordea, Target, RBC, Tivo, Capital One, Chartboost

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. Confluent

April 2026

Free Report: CloverETL vs. Confluent

Find out what your peers are saying about CloverETL vs. Confluent and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloverETL vs. Confluent report.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.