No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
21st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
2.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
3rd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (7th), Patch Management (4th), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (3rd), Software Supply Chain Security (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 3.4%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Attack Surface Management (ASM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management3.4%
CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise0.9%
Other95.7%
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
 

Featured Reviews

Prabhudarshan Samal - PeerSpot reviewer
Infosec Analyst at Zoetis
Brand monitoring has strengthened dark web detection and enabled faster fraud takedowns
The best feature CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise offers is the Brand Reputation module. What makes the Brand Reputation module stand out is its accuracy and coverage. The deep dark web feeds and intelligence I received were accurate approximately eight out of ten times. I was able to take quick actions, and proactive measures were implemented to remediate risks. CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise has positively impacted my organization through specific outcomes and improvements. We have remediated our risks, addressed our internal risks and insider risks, and protected against data breaches, thus achieving significant improvements.
Nicki Møller - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Security Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Enables automation and quick access to necessary information
One of the significant challenges Qualys is discovery, which I know Microsoft excels at. I can't recall how well Qualys performs this function; it seems I might be missing some details. However, if there's one key aspect to focus on, it's discovery—the ability to identify assets that you are not aware of, even when you can see they are present. Understanding what those assets are is crucial. With Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, it was very difficult to extract detections from the system. The features within Qualys are limited to what they have developed. Sometimes a complete overview is needed to push to a Power BI dashboard, Splunk, ServiceNow, or other platforms. The export process is incredibly challenging. We needed a developer to write a hundred-line Python script that would loop over certain assets due to export limitations. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management could improve its integration capabilities. While it generates substantial data, correlating it with other data sources can be challenging. The export process is difficult, and pre-built integrations with other tools could be enhanced for better process implementation.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise has positively impacted my organization through specific outcomes and improvements, as we have remediated our risks, addressed our internal risks and insider risks, and protected against data breaches, thus achieving significant improvements."
"I recommend this platform because it uses AI plus threat intelligence technology that identifies phishing leaks and impersonations, and if anything is going to happen, this tool provides early threat detection, which is beneficial for our company."
"I like the EASM part because it provides visibility into unmanaged assets that are public-facing."
"We have had zero attacks since we enabled all the features in Qualys CSAM."
"I would rate Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten."
"Getting different kinds of modules and inventory in one solution is good enough."
"Qualys CSAM is valuable for providing end-of-life and end-of-sale information. It gives me visibility into the number of products or hardware items that are end-of-life."
"The support is extremely helpful, deserving a 10 out of 10 rating."
"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers comprehensive features to cover our entire attack surface."
"The most valuable feature is the real-time visibility Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides into all assets across our development and operational environments."
 

Cons

"I think it still needs improvement in alert accuracy, the vulnerability depth, and full SOC automation."
"One downside of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is that I would prefer to see a more interactive dashboard."
"The UI needs improvement as it can become overwhelming after prolonged use."
"From the user experience perspective, we need a simpler interface and reduced complexity in certain features, particularly with the Qualys Query Language."
"Further research and development are needed to enhance integration with other cloud agents and products, particularly improving communication with external products and vendors."
"They should address the false positives generated in EASM. It is fetching assets that have Infosys as the keyword. They should fix that."
"We've received very poor guidance from them, especially after learning several things we need to fix during the Qualys conference."
"Qualys could improve by enhancing its dynamic tagging and role-based access control features, and by refining its user interface for a more intuitive and efficient user experience."
"In the best practice for categorizing assets with the C-SAM module in Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, I see potential for improvement with integration of other CMDB systems in creating a relationship with Qualys and other solutions."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing is fair. I would love to see the price come down a little bit, but we do get a lot of value out of it. We are squeezing every ounce of value we can out of the tool."
"The pricing for Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management is reasonable, with an annual subscription costing around $1,000 per year or a monthly subscription starting at approximately $72 per month, depending on the specific package and features included."
"The pricing is market-competitive."
"The cost for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is high."
"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can be expensive, especially if we already have VMDR."
"It is cost-effective because, in a single tool, we are getting everything. All the solutions come in a single license or price."
"Though the solution is considered expensive, if bundled with other services such as VMDR or cloud agents, its value would significantly increase. It is currently a bit costly, but with bundling, it could become attractive to more customers."
"The pricing for Qualys CSAM is nominal."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise?
I think it still needs improvement in alert accuracy, the vulnerability depth, and full SOC automation.
What is your primary use case for CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise?
I used CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise, specifically the Brand Reputation Monitoring module, when working for IBM from January to April 2024. The company's threat intelligence platform was utilized for...
What advice do you have for others considering CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise?
I think it will definitely improve as the technology is already evolving. From time to time as we are learning, the AI is getting stronger and stronger. The threat landscape keeps evolving. The bes...
What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?
I think the one thing Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can do better is the package management and the updating process. Knowing that you can't update any of the packages until you've done the...
What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?
I primarily use it for a small, single-site, multi-source setup with multi-WAN inputs. I have a main fiber connection and a couple of failovers while managing different networks across different se...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.