No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise vs ImmuniWeb comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
21st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
2.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ImmuniWeb
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
30th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (34th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ImmuniWeb is 1.4%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Attack Surface Management (ASM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise0.9%
ImmuniWeb1.4%
Other97.7%
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
 

Featured Reviews

Prabhudarshan Samal - PeerSpot reviewer
Infosec Analyst at Zoetis
Brand monitoring has strengthened dark web detection and enabled faster fraud takedowns
The best feature CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise offers is the Brand Reputation module. What makes the Brand Reputation module stand out is its accuracy and coverage. The deep dark web feeds and intelligence I received were accurate approximately eight out of ten times. I was able to take quick actions, and proactive measures were implemented to remediate risks. CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise has positively impacted my organization through specific outcomes and improvements. We have remediated our risks, addressed our internal risks and insider risks, and protected against data breaches, thus achieving significant improvements.
Vivek Ashvinbhai Pancholi - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Cybersecurity Consultant at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Commendable Solution with Robust Vulnerability Detection Mechanism Suitable for Global Market
The solution helped us with one of our clients in the New York area contacted us about a data breach. In response, we swiftly organized a case meeting involving our client, internal, and email customer support teams. Together, we conducted an incident response, facilitating offline assistance for proper planning and risk management processes. We delved into the details of the data breach, identified how it occurred, and collaborated to rectify the issue. The client expressed satisfaction with the resolution process.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I recommend this platform because it uses AI plus threat intelligence technology that identifies phishing leaks and impersonations, and if anything is going to happen, this tool provides early threat detection, which is beneficial for our company."
"CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise has positively impacted my organization through specific outcomes and improvements, as we have remediated our risks, addressed our internal risks and insider risks, and protected against data breaches, thus achieving significant improvements."
"The ImmuniWeb Platform is the best and easiest way to secure a business online."
"ImmuniWeb boasts a robust vulnerability detection mechanism, formidable threat mitigation, and an efficient remediation process, incorporating automation techniques and ALM strategies. The solution is highly stable. The solution is scalable. Editing Key Points for Review "Review about ImmuniWeb" What is our primary use case? We use the solution when we face challenges and urgent attention is needed for complex cases from our clients. To address this, we collaborate with the middleware, internal, and client teams to analyze and sort through intricate logs concerning our business cybersecurity program. How has it helped my organization? The solution helped us with one of our clients in the New York area contacted us about a data breach. In response, we swiftly organized a case meeting involving our client, internal, and email customer support teams. Together, we conducted an incident response, facilitating offline assistance for proper planning and risk management processes. We delved into the details of the data breach, identified how it occurred, and collaborated to rectify the issue. The client expressed satisfaction with the resolution process. What is most valuable? ImmuniWeb boasts a robust vulnerability detection mechanism, formidable threat mitigation, and an efficient remediation process, incorporating automation techniques and ALM strategies. It also focuses on consumer satisfaction and operates in English-speaking markets, primarily required by the UAE, the United States, Canada, and Australia, among other developed countries. For how long have I used the solution? We have been using this product for the past one and half years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The solution is highly stable. I rate it a perfect ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? The solution is scalable. I rate it a nine out of ten. How are customer service and support? Support is generally excellent"
"The initial setup process is user-friendly."
"After the assessment, you clearly know which assets require penetration testing."
"I have managed to deliver to my clients the services of Ethical Hacking in less time, with better deliverables, and other key differentiators that make my company more competitive in the local market."
"The most valuable features are the SLA of Zero false-positives, less time of service development, validation of unlimited patched vulnerabilities, and several others."
"The solution's most valuable feature is reporting."
"ImmuniWeb is stable."
 

Cons

"I think it still needs improvement in alert accuracy, the vulnerability depth, and full SOC automation."
"It would be better if they had an automated tagging feature. The tagging functionality currently requires manual tagging, and that's probably the most needed feature from my standpoint. We also do not have enough tools, enough features, or options to display different resources in the way we need. There are basic grouping and some filtering features, but we still cannot fully separate some flavors of our resources. However, we may not be aware of the latest features."
"ImmuniWeb sometimes shows previous scans instead of running tests."
"The product’s interface for the web applications could be similar to Android and iOS versions."
"The deployment process on the cloud is straightforward, while on-premise can be complex. Support is generally excellent, although there can be delays in ticket resolution."
"Its technical support could be better."
"You may find the dashboard a bit complicated."
"A great idea would be to make a mobile application for the ImmuniWeb portal so that all information would be available on the go and from a mobile phone as well. It would be much more convenient."
"A great idea would be to support using Discovery on the internal network, allowing delivery of all the features of the current Discovery to internal network resources."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"There should be the flexibility to change or add pricing, especially for pay-per-use cases."
"It is pretty expensive."
"ImmuniWeb is relatively cheap. It's a competitive price compared to other products in the marketplace. It's worth the money we are paying for it."
"The platform is expensive if a large development is involved. However, it is less expensive for scheduled-based testing, quarterly or in a year."
"The values of ImmuniWeb are currently significantly below what is valued in the Chilean market for these services and solutions."
"I use the product's free version. The tool costs around 229 dollars."
"It is pretty expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Construction Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise?
I think it still needs improvement in alert accuracy, the vulnerability depth, and full SOC automation.
What is your primary use case for CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise?
I used CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise, specifically the Brand Reputation Monitoring module, when working for IBM from January to April 2024. The company's threat intelligence platform was utilized for...
What advice do you have for others considering CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise?
I think it will definitely improve as the technology is already evolving. From time to time as we are learning, the AI is getting stronger and stronger. The threat landscape keeps evolving. The bes...
What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?
That's one of the most critical questions any development team faces! Securing a web application requires a layered approach, not a single tool. Here is a quick breakdown of what to recommend: In...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Ebay, United Nations, Next Bank Credit Agricole, Geneva Swiss Bank, Banca Stato, Celgene, SIM University, Heymarket, Swissquote, more...
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise vs. ImmuniWeb and other solutions. Updated: July 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.