We performed a comparison between AWS Application Migration Service and vCloud Director based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Zerto, IBM and others in Cloud Migration."The CloudEndure feature is most valuable because it is user friendly and very simple."
"The product is reasonably priced."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the solution's support a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is the live, block-to-block replication."
"Live Migration's best feature is that it's free."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"vCloud Director is a stable solution."
"It helps ensure security across our cloud environments."
"We can run it on self-hosted systems, and we are happy with the stability of vCloud Director."
"We use the infrastructure as a service cloud, that is, we use the features as infrastructure for this. We are not using any platform services."
"The initial installation and setup are very quick."
"The solution is reliable and performs well."
"The most valuable feature of vCloud Director for me is its user-friendly UI, which is much easier compared to other platforms."
"Live Migration has some issues with target setups."
"I do not see any improvements required for the CloudEndure."
"One drawback to using CloudEndure is that the default is to give one small, lightweight server, which is created in the cloud."
"I think it is important to have more logs, and more details would be great because we have just logged on the client's side, but there weren't many details on the cloud."
"We would like to have a disaster recovery feature included in this solution."
"What could be improved in vCloud Director, particularly from the networking side, is its integration with other network devices. It also needs a more simplified installation because the process is a little bit complicated."
"Lacking additional services reduces the level of cloud integration companies just love with Amazon and Azure."
"vCloud Director isn't cheap."
"The solution requires a lot of hardware and resources for cloud deployment than other competitors. Additionally, the performance could improve."
"If I just need to look for something quickly, it's quite difficult to find it with the way it's set up now. They should make the search button better."
"In version 6.7, compatibility to migrate VMs from a vCenter to vCloud Director had a problem. However, this has been solved in the newest version."
"Database services need to go beyond what they are currently doing."
"It would be beneficial to have enhanced integration capabilities with third-party solutions within vCloud Director, especially in networking and data security."
More AWS Application Migration Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Application Migration Service is ranked 9th in Cloud Migration with 5 reviews while vCloud Director is ranked 5th in Cloud Management with 61 reviews. AWS Application Migration Service is rated 8.2, while vCloud Director is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Application Migration Service writes "Well priced, easy to expand, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCloud Director writes "Offers flexibility of handling workloads and good scalability". AWS Application Migration Service is most compared with Zerto and Carbonite Migrate, whereas vCloud Director is most compared with VMware Aria Automation, Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM), Morpheus, CloudStack and VMware Aria Operations.
We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.