CloudCheckr vs Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) comparison

Spot - A Flexera company and Nutanix are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Spot - A Flexera company is ranked #28 with an average rating of 6.0, while Nutanix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.9. Spot - A Flexera company holds a 1.3% mindshare in CM, compared to Nutanix’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Spot - A Flexera company users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

CloudCheckr

Read 8 CloudCheckr reviews

924 Views
444 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Read 27 Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) reviews

2,895 Views
261 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudCheckr and Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) are competing products in the cloud management solutions space. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) holds an advantage due to its robust feature set, while CloudCheckr is seen more favorably in terms of pricing and support.

Features: CloudCheckr offers billing optimization, cost visualization, and compliance monitoring which are essential for financial and security management. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) provides significant integration capabilities with existing IT environments, enabling hybrid cloud solutions with seamless mobility and cohesive management across private and public clouds.

Room for Improvement: CloudCheckr could improve its integration capabilities with existing systems, enhance its hybrid cloud solutions, and expand its automation features. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) may focus on reducing its deployment complexity, increase cost efficiency, and enhance support for additional cloud environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudCheckr provides comprehensive deployment resources and robust customer support for cloud infrastructure management. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) offers a straightforward deployment model with fast setup and built-in high availability, ensuring easier integration with existing on-premises infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI: CloudCheckr is recognized for its cost efficiency and value through detailed financial oversight. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) tends to have a more substantial upfront investment but potentially delivers higher long-term value with its scalability and hybrid cloud flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudCheckr vs. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr vs. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Management

28th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (11th), Managed Cloud Services (7th)

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Ranking in Cloud Management

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (9th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudCheckr is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)	0.8%
CloudCheckr	1.3%
Other	97.9%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Peter Ramnath

Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides recommendations regarding how cost and consumption can be adjusted, but the reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited

We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security compliance feature doesn’t give much data because CloudCheckr has done a majority of its development on AWS. The majority of our clients are on Microsoft Azure. There are a lot of features and information available for Amazon, but not for Azure. The tool wasn't meeting our expectations. The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited. There's no ability to do scheduled email reports. The report could only be sent to a single email address. The tool was not very usable. We had multiple clients and tasks to work with.

Read full review

Panomporn_Meesangeam

Tech Sales at AWN

Integrated with the personal files and knowledge management processes but is expensive

The customer is a company in Thailand. They use Nutanix Cloud Clusters for file sharing and integrate with personal file share and knowledge management. Our customer attaches a file service with a login and connects with WiFi for cloud content, such as second documents or email access files…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is mostly stable."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"In terms of dealing with our business-critical workloads, Nutanix is a highly scalable, highly resilient, and very high-performing solution."

"The features I appreciate most about Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) are that we don't need to manage the hardware to start up with, and it is being managed by Microsoft currently, so that is hands-off."

"The feature I find most valuable about Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is the portability."

"The feature I probably appreciate the most about Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is its scalability—how quickly I can deploy more nodes on a cluster and remove nodes."

"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Clusters is to protect the data."

"What I admire most about Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is its scalability; that option that everybody seems to eventually go to is cloud, and we're ready for that when we decide."

"The license portability is good enough."

"It's easy to use, the UI is easy to configure, and it supports snapshots and backup integration."

More Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) pros

Cons

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) could be improved as it currently looks and feels slightly different than on-prem."

"The biggest weakness with Clusters at this point is that the adoption rate is low because customers don't know enough about it."

"The product could be improved in scalability and support services."

"In the current version, we've noticed many false positives when we check the alerts in the morning. For example, it told us that services stopped working, but there was nothing wrong when we checked it out. We've already raised the issue with support. They told us it's a bug in the version we use. We're about to upgrade to the recommended version, so it should be fine."

"My suggestion would be getting up to speed on ransomware and evolving, as attackers are always one step ahead of what's out there."

"Having compatible feature sets between Azure and AWS would go a long way to improving the overall NC2 experience."

"We've had some challenges with the implementation."

"The interface organization can be better. If we can, for example, organize virtual machines by groups, folders, and sub-folders, it will be easier to administer and monitor."

More Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

"I'm not familiar with the contracts, but I thought the process was pretty seamless. Licensing for the Nutanix part was the same as licensing something on-prem, and since it runs on bare metal EC2, there was no new process we had to go through—it fits into our existing procurement processes nicely. I appreciate Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)'s license portability."

"The transition from the perpetual license to what they have now is, from a business perspective, understandable, but from an operational and cost perspective, for me, it is really expensive. However, our partners at Nutanix did work with us recently and reduced a huge licensing cost for us."

"The solution has been more costly at this point. We do not see any cost savings."

"I am working on one configuration that is priced at $50,000 USD, whereas another one that I'm working on is estimated to cost $250,000 USD."

"The licensing portability can be very interesting. At the moment, I am working with Nutanix Appliances with the AHV as a hypervisor. I did not have a chance to ask for portability between platforms, but it will be good if you can have portability between multiple types of platforms."

"There are positives and negatives to licensing. It all makes sense now, but it took a while. When the licenses first changed, it was a bit confusing."

"The licensing model of Nutanix is complex."

"I feel that the prices could be improved, but the truth is that I am very happy. The license price keeps increasing, but I am confident that it is much more reasonable than other brands."

More Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

The price depends on the actual Azure consumption and what we feed into it. The cost is on par with other providers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

See all answers

What do you like most about Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)?

The overall infrastructure is the most valuable part of Nutanix Cloud Clusters.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)?

I'm not familiar with the contracts, but I thought the process was pretty seamless. Licensing for the Nutanix part was the same as licensing something on-prem, and since it runs on bare metal EC2, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)?

We've been told some of these things are on the road map. I believe that networking is one of the biggest improvements. They have a great stock already, but some use cases, particularly around incr...

See all answers

Comparisons

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 23% of the time

Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 17% of the time

Apptio One vs CloudCheckr

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 13% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr

Compared 12% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

AWS Outposts vs Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Compared 15% of the time

VMware Cloud Foundation vs Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Stack vs Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Compared 11% of the time

More Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

October 2025

Download CloudCheckr product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

September 2025

Download Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) product report

Also Known As

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

Nutanix Clusters

Overview

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot - A Flexera company

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) provide scalable and cost-efficient infrastructure management across cloud and on-premises environments. With features like data portability and ease of setup, NC2 enables seamless migration without application refactoring.

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) supports businesses in managing hybrid IT environments, enhancing disaster recovery, and optimizing workloads. Users value NC2 for its unified management platform and redundancy features, facilitating cloud migration and integration with major cloud providers. Challenges include pricing and initial setup complexity, as well as feature parity between different cloud services.

What are the key features of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)?

Scalability: Easily scales resources to meet business demands.
Cost Management: Controls and reduces cloud-related expenses.
Data Portability: Ensures seamless migration between environments.
Unified Management: Manages both cloud and on-premises platforms from one place.
Integration: Connects efficiently with multiple cloud providers.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Redundancy: Enhances disaster recovery capabilities and operational resilience.
License Portability: Simplifies license management across different environments.
Optimized Workloads: Maintains performance and reduces unnecessary costs.
Efficient Setup: Simplifies initial adjustments, ensuring quick deployment.

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) find application in industries requiring reliable infrastructure management, like finance and healthcare, to safeguard critical systems. Organizations leverage NC2 for virtual desktops, application modernization, and smooth transition to cloud operations, improving data security and replication processes.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

The Home Depot, JetBlue, Hyundai, ShiftLeft

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr vs. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

September 2025

Free Report: CloudCheckr vs. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudCheckr vs. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudCheckr vs. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.