No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF vs Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudbric Managed Rules for...
Ranking in Business Rules Management
8th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Fortinet Managed Rules for ...
Ranking in Business Rules Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Business Rules Management category, the mindshare of Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF is 1.4%. The mindshare of Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF is 2.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Rules Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF2.0%
Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF1.4%
Other96.6%
Business Rules Management
 

Featured Reviews

Ayodeji Bayo-Makinde - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Support Engineer at Horizon/Bespoke Labs
Granular api security has freed team resources and reduced effort but detection accuracy needs work
The feature that stands out to me the most about Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF is the API protection, as many managed WAF rule sets are originally designed around traditional websites, but Cloudbric integrates a dedicated API protection module aimed at REST APIs, GraphQL endpoints, XML validation, and API-specific attacks. My experience with the API protection module is positive, as I had one implementation for a mobile backend and some FinTech APIs where Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF really worked wonders for that setup, requiring minimal modifications or tweaking. Another thing I appreciate about Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF is that it does not force me into a monolithic package, allowing for selective deployments where I can choose specific protections such as only malicious IP, thus providing flexibility to control costs and capacity consumption. Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF has positively impacted my organization by freeing up human resources that would otherwise be dedicated to creating and managing WAF rules, helping me reduce costs as I can streamline WAF rules for some applications and deploy protection in less than an hour instead of days or weeks.
Vivek Patoliya - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at Indic
Automation has strengthened bot control and web traffic security across our cloud workloads
One of the best features of Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF is the automation of rule updates, which significantly reduces the need for manual intervention. The managed rule sets provide effective coverage for common OWASP Top 10 threats, SQL injection attempts, and malicious bot activity, helping strengthen baseline application security. Bot control and traffic filtering capabilities have been particularly useful in ensuring that incoming traffic is legitimate, improving visibility into request behavior and reducing unwanted or suspicious activity. The ability to quickly apply policies such as geo‑blocking and IP reputation checks through AWS WAF integration also saves time and simplifies daily operations. Overall, these features help balance strong security with lower operational overhead.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF has positively impacted my organization by improving both security and efficiency when deploying these services without having to manage or create those WAF rules myself."
"Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF has positively impacted my organization by freeing up human resources that would otherwise be dedicated to creating and managing WAF rules, helping me reduce costs as I can streamline WAF rules for some applications and deploy protection in less than an hour instead of days or weeks."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF has positively impacted my organization by improving application security by blocking threats automatically, reducing manual effort, and ensuring consistent protection with real-time updates."
"Since using Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF, financial losses have gradually decreased, and whenever a hacker was trying to exploit the system and asking for a bounty, that threat was completely eliminated."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF offers the best features by protecting my servers and blocking unauthorized access while also giving me the flexibility to only enable allowed access."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF has positively impacted my organization mainly by controlling the use of bots, as hackers and even ethical hackers feed data using them, helping us ensure that the traffic we are receiving is genuine and allowing us to analyze request times for each packet for great insight while automation saves time, lets me set geolocation rules, and track source IP behavior, which is very helpful for my organization."
"Overall, Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF is a strong solution providing effective protection against common web threats while benefiting from FortiGuard threat intelligence and reduced operational effort through automatic rule updates."
"The best features Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF offers include regularly updated rules which incorporate the latest threat intelligence, logs, alerts, and the ability to block malicious requests that we have found on this WAF."
"We get the benefits of continuous threat intelligence updates with very strong network security."
"After implementing Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF, I observed measurable improvements, with around 70 to 90% of common web attack traffic blocked, a 60% reduction in application-level security alerts and incidents, and a substantial decrease in the time spent on WAF management from hours per week to near zero."
 

Cons

"I find that the only drawbacks with Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF are its less market penetration, especially in North America and Europe, resulting in fewer community reviews, published case studies, and a small ecosystem of users, along with less third-party validation and occasional false positives triggered by API payload or JSON bodies."
"To improve Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF, they need to work on automating SQL queries as there is still manual work involved in managing the rules."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF are very effective, but areas for improvement include better visibility into rule logic, deeper API schema validation, and advanced bot management features."
"Overall, Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF is a solid solution, but it could be improved with more granular customization of managed rules, better visibility into why specific requests are blocked, more detailed reporting and analytics, and tighter integration with SIEM and SOAR platforms for incident response, which would add value."
"My core concern regarding the product lies in the reporting functions, where I face limitations, particularly tenant-wise."
"User interface and ease of management are areas where improvement is needed."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF should have AI-driven threat detection to reduce false positives, and the UI should be improved."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF can be improved by offering more customization options, better visibility into rule behavior, and easier tuning to reduce false positives."
"Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF is strong overall, but there are a few areas where improvements could make it even more effective."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Rules Management solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
44%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Transportation Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
Construction Company
27%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Logistics Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF?
My experience with the price, implementation costs, and licensing of this tool was that I did not have any noteworthy problems; everything went smoothly.
What needs improvement with Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF?
I would like Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF to continue being improved.
What is your primary use case for Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF?
My main use case for Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF is to associate it with CloudFront distributions, API Gateway, and application load balancers in the different applications that I deploy on...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF?
The pricing was reasonable considering the automatic updates, FortiGuard threat intelligence, and reduced operational effort.
What needs improvement with Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF?
Overall, Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF is a solid solution, but it could be improved with more granular customization of managed rules, better visibility into why specific requests are blocked...
What is your primary use case for Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF?
My main use case for Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF is to protect our internal intranet sites and to publish some load as we are using it there. Regarding my main use case, ease of adoption, ru...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudbric Managed Rules for AWS WAF vs. Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.