Cisco UCS Manager vs Nagios Fusion comparison

Cisco and Nagios are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.8, while Nagios is ranked #71. Cisco holds a 1.3% mindshare in IM, compared to Nagios’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

4,060 Views
3,776 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Nagios Fusion

Read 4 Nagios Fusion reviews

1,142 Views
1,131 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

Nagios Fusion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Cisco UCS Manager and Nagios Fusion compete in IT infrastructure management, focusing on server management and network monitoring, respectively. Cisco UCS Manager has the upper hand due to its comprehensive infrastructure control.

Features: Cisco UCS Manager integrates server, network, and storage components, streamlining server management with automated workflows and improving resource utilization. Nagios Fusion aggregates multiple monitoring servers for a centralized view of distributed systems, enhancing network visibility and alert management.

Room for Improvement: Cisco UCS Manager can improve by simplifying its setup process, expanding compatibility with non-Cisco hardware, and reducing the learning curve for new users. Nagios Fusion could enhance real-time performance reporting, improve its alert customization options, and refine its user interface for better navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS Manager's deployment model integrates with Cisco hardware, offering robust management features but more complexity. It provides dedicated support channels. Nagios Fusion is simpler to deploy in varied environments, with flexibility in setup and community-driven support, benefiting from community resources.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS Manager may involve a higher setup cost due to hardware integration, justified by improved management and long-term savings. Nagios Fusion provides a more cost-efficient setup with reduced network downtime, resulting in quicker ROI. Differences are seen where Cisco's upfront costs aim for sustained benefits, while Nagios focuses on network efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Manager vs. Nagios Fusion Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. Nagios Fusion

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nagios Fusion

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

71st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Fusion is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco UCS Manager	1.3%
Nagios Fusion	0.5%
Other	98.2%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Rob-Croxford

Consultant at rcnss

A market leader with an enhanced user interface for seamless experience

There is room for improvement in terms of cost and complexity to set up. It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing. Some settings are still fairly well hidden, even the basic ones. Companies don't really understand how long it takes to set up. Also, when changes are pushed, it can take their phone line off the system for twenty minutes to half an hour. Out-of-the-box functionality is an issue, too. I know that my company is different, however, the basics are always the same. You do your tap lines, zip lines, and stuff like that, then you get your internal phone line system. That can all be automated and scripted, and it's probably part of the automation process. However, I haven't really seen it.

Read full review

SyarulIdzuddin Adzmi

Operation Director at Digital Pulse Sdn Bhd

A suitable choice for unified and efficient infrastructure monitoring across diverse environments providing user-friendly GUI, cost-effectiveness, and versatility

We use it for this specific client, they've deployed multiple instances of it across various locations to facilitate monitoring. To effectively monitor their infrastructure, it seems necessary to implement additional monitoring solutions for all three types of devices they have Nagios Fusion…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cisco UCS Manager is a very useful product for managing our entire ecosystem for Cisco products."

"For the blade architecture and ease of use, I consider Cisco UCS Manager the best option on the market at the moment."

"The most valuable features are flexibility and management."

"Creating UCS service profiles for quickly deploying servers and replicating that configuration to another server makes it easier for deployment."

"The management is one of the most valuable features of this solution, and I also like the dashboard, as it is quite user-friendly."

"The solution is highly scalable, mainly because of the templates that make it easy for you to actually edit on the system."

"One of the valuable features is the user interface base."

"When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

"Being open source lets us customize it for our monitoring needs, saving us money."

"It's very easy to manage and monitor it."

"It is easier for client installation, and the configurations are doable even for a newcomer in the field."

"Nagios Fusion version 12.8 excels in user-friendly GUI design, cost-effectiveness, and ease of deployment."

Cons

"I would like to see Cisco UCS optionally work as a hyper-converged system because right now, it only operates as a converged system."

"We have three data centers and if we could manage all three data centers using one interface, it would be great."

"Cisco UCS Manager is not a scalable solution because once you have 160 blades, it cannot be expanded more."

"There is room for improvement in the software part of Cisco UCS Manager. It should be more user-friendly, especially when creating policies."

"What's lacking in Cisco UCS Manager is the performance dashboard. If a blade has any performance issues, you should be able to create a dashboard on Cisco UCS Manager. Currently, this feature isn't present."

"There is room for improvement in terms of cost and complexity to set up. It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing."

"In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to their security."

"The solution's pricing is high and could be reduced."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

"Nagios Fusion should include a 'remember me' option when logging in, so we don't need to enter a username and password every time."

"There are some bugs, although not that many. There are some situations where the solution is not stable but the number of problems is not very high."

"In future iterations of this solution, there is a desire for more seamless integration with other monitoring software."

"Adding application performance monitoring to the product alongside infrastructure monitoring would make it a more complete and useful solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

"The pricing is quite reasonable, especially when compared to the broader market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

12%

University

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	19

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco UCS Manager?

Our primary use case involves working with Cisco UCS B-Series ( /products/cisco-ucs-b-series-reviews ), specifically the UCS X modular deployment. We are setting up a new deployment shortly.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 56% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

Zenoss Cloud vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 28% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 22% of the time

Icinga vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 12% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 9% of the time

More Nagios Fusion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

June 2026

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

June 2026

Download Nagios Fusion product report

Overview

Cisco UCS Manager enables streamlined operations through unified storage, networking, and computing management, offering enhanced reliability and flexibility.

Cisco UCS Manager provides enhanced management capabilities for infrastructures, simplifying server deployment and operations. Its user-friendly interface aids in easy configuration and visibility, including robust reporting. UCS Manager supports efficient firmware and OS updates for large deployments, ensuring smooth operations across physical and virtual environments.

What key features does Cisco UCS Manager offer?

Hardware Profile Association: Ensures seamless hardware configurations.
Unified Management: Centralizes control of storage, networking, and computing resources.
Service Profiles: Simplifies server deployment and management.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Provides intuitive interface and strong reporting.
High Availability: Facilitates resource expansion and stability.

What benefits are important when considering Cisco UCS Manager?

Operational Efficiency: Reduces downtime and enhances deployment speed.
Centralized Control: Streamlines management across blades and configurations.
Scalability: Supports mass deployments and expansion.
Visibility and Reporting: Improves infrastructure monitoring and analytics.

In industries managing extensive IT infrastructures, such as healthcare and finance, Cisco UCS Manager is crucial for optimizing server and network operations. It enables efficient creation of server profiles, integration with networking systems, and comprehensive monitoring, ensuring high availability and reduced setup time for complex environments.

Cisco

Nagios Fusion provides centralized monitoring, delivering real-time status updates and comprehensive visualizations, ideal for comprehensive IT environments.

Designed to aggregate data from multiple Nagios instances, Nagios Fusion simplifies monitoring by offering a unified view. It enhances IT operations management through quick access to crucial metrics and alerts. Organizations can efficiently monitor network performance, ensuring errors are promptly identified and rectified. Its integration with Nagios Core and XI streamlines information management, offering comprehensive visibility.

What are the valuable features of Nagios Fusion?

Centralized Monitoring: Integrates multiple Nagios instances for a single-pane-of-glass overview.
Real-Time Status Updates: Provides immediate insights on network and server status.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors monitoring views to meet specific requirements.

What benefits do users look for in Nagios Fusion reviews?

Enhanced Monitoring Capabilities: Improved visibility and control over IT systems.
Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructure needs without compromising performance.
Time Savings: Reduces the time spent on manual monitoring processes.

Nagios Fusion is used across industries like healthcare, finance, and manufacturing to ensure seamless operations. In finance, it monitors transaction processes, offering reliable system checks, while in healthcare, it supports critical system uptime, contributing to uninterrupted patient care.

Nagios

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

NuBlue, St.Elisabeth Hospital, Akamit Systems, National Radio Astronomy Observatory, ValueClick, Sunrise Banks

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. Nagios Fusion

June 2026

Free Report: Cisco UCS Manager vs. Nagios Fusion

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Manager vs. Nagios Fusion and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Manager vs. Nagios Fusion report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.