Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco UCS B-Series vs Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series comparison

Cisco and Fujitsu are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Cisco is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4, while Fujitsu is ranked #15. Cisco holds a 7.3% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Fujitsu’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution.
Cisco UCS B-Series
Read 74 Cisco UCS B-Series reviews
  • 1,089 Views
  • 1,056 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series
Read 3 Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series reviews
  • 174 Views
  • 174 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Cisco UCS B-Series and Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series are enterprise-level blade server solutions focusing on efficiency and scalability. Cisco UCS B-Series holds an advantage due to its superior user interface capabilities and efficient management tools, making it easier to manage. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series provides a feature-rich design for specific enterprise needs, making it appealing despite higher costs.

Features: Cisco UCS B-Series includes advanced network connectivity, integrating Unified Fabric technology, and superior software tools for management tasks, distinguishing it in user interface features. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series offers robust system scalability, a feature-rich architecture for enterprise-specific needs, and the ability to accommodate future expansion, thus highlighting its hardware customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS B-Series provides a seamless deployment experience with comprehensive support, enhancing stability and user satisfaction through reliable infrastructure services. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series focuses on modularity and flexibility, backed by strong customer service addressing integration challenges, thus providing an adaptable deployment approach.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS B-Series typically offers competitive pricing and favorable ROI due to its management efficiency, reducing operational costs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series involves higher initial costs but offers significant long-term benefits based on its feature investments, making it a greater value proposition over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 871,829 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS B-Series
Ranking in Blade Servers
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
74
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series
Ranking in Blade Servers
15th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS B-Series is 7.3%, down from 9.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is 0.8%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Blade Servers Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Cisco UCS B-Series7.3%
Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series0.8%
Other91.9%
Blade Servers
 

Featured Reviews

DavidMbugua - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable product with efficient automation capabilities
Cisco UCS B-Series manages various processes, including handling payments for over 650,000 growers, running group financials, managing human resources, and operating our main ERP system, SAP. The servers' resilience was particularly impactful. Even during power outages, the servers resumed operations from the last saved point without human intervention. The enhanced processing speed also allowed us to complete tasks that took two days in just one hour. The automation capabilities enhanced efficiency and facilitated integration with our networking components, particularly since we also used Cisco switches. The servers' security was reliable, and formal training on Cisco products made management easier. I rate the product an eight.
Read full review
Cyrille Darmon - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly stable solution with technical support that is not only good but also always available to help the product's users
My company's IT activities are carried out with the help of the solution. My company's customers use the solution in their telecom department or for telecommunication purposes The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability. The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series should be…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"If we could get more reference architecture available on the portal, it would be helpful in making decisions"
"Dell has a huge portfolio of products."
"The platform has valuable features for management and good monitoring tools. It provides efficient insights."
"Cisco UCS B-Series is scalable."
"Great security and functionality."
"The most valuable feature is definitely the service profile."
"The Cisco solution provides a unified dashboard which enhances virtualization tasks, allowing configurations from a single interface. It also helps with space and power management, which are vital for data center efficiency."
"The most beneficial feature is UCS Manager. It's the best way to manage hardware, creating group policies, like scrub policies and maintenance policies."
More Cisco UCS B-Series pros
"Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series has two processors."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability."
 

Cons

"Integration with storage could be improved."
"Cisco UCS B-Series competitors have similar features as they do, Cisco needs to make some changes to make their offering better."
"The graphic code that UCS can support is limited and less accessible than other systems."
"The integration is an area where Cisco UCS B-Series needs to provide users with more details."
"The cost is expensive and has room for improvement."
"There is a delay in the product's reporting and the rebooting system compared to servers from other vendors."
"The solution’s technical support could be better."
"The upgrades could be improved."
More Cisco UCS B-Series cons
"It can have more automation. In addition, Fujitsu should have a broader portfolio, not specifically in terms of the service solutions, but more in terms of the big picture. A broader portfolio would be nice for providing different solutions for the customers."
"The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series was complex."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for Cisco products is always high."
"The price of this solution compared to others is fair."
"The cost of the blade servers is okay, but the cost of Fabric Interconnects ends up increasing the overall costs. For example, suppose it costs 3,500 USD per blade server. When you include the Fabric Interconnects, you could pay up to 30,000 USD. Therefore, compared to the cost of servers from Lenovo, Huawei, Dell, or HP, the cost of Cisco servers can be high. However, Cisco gives good discounts (about 90% to 94%) to partners and to customers who are already using Cisco servers. New Cisco customers do not get the level of discount that an existing customer does. Because you can get discounts with Cisco, I would give pricing a rating of four out of five."
"It is not a yearly subscription but a yearly support renewal that you need to do for Cisco UCS B-Series."
"Every three years, I need to renew my license and support the product...Every time I have to opt for the renewal of the license, I am shocked to learn about the increase in the price of the product."
"Pricing will be based on your requirements so it is important to plan, engage, and negotiate directly with the Cisco Account Manager."
"The type of service level purchase will determine the level of support response that you receive from Cisco."
"It makes much more sense for individual licenses for distributed environments"
More Cisco UCS B-Series pricing and cost advice
"There are special licenses that are connected to the usage. We installed Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series for a high PC solution, and for this reason, some Microsoft licenses and other special licenses were embedded or bundled to the Fujitsu solution."
"No license is required to operate the product."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
871,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
10%
Performing Arts
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise41
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS B-Series?
The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easily scalable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS B-Series?
Comparing Cisco UCS B-Series with traditional servers, while its initial cost may be slightly higher, it is not as expensive as Oracle Exadata, making it a worthwhile investment. It pays off in the...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cisco UCS B-Series?
There is a need for Cisco UCS B-Series to evolve and scale vertically, particularly with the increasing data demands and the integration of AI, ensuring the solution remains certified and capable u...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs Cisco UCS B-Series Logo
HPE Synergy vs Cisco UCS B-Series
Compared 32% of the time
Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs Cisco UCS B-Series Logo
Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs Cisco UCS B-Series
Compared 18% of the time
Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs Cisco UCS B-Series Logo
Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs Cisco UCS B-Series
Compared 17% of the time
HPE BladeSystem vs Cisco UCS B-Series Logo
HPE BladeSystem vs Cisco UCS B-Series
Compared 14% of the time
Supermicro SuperBlade vs Cisco UCS B-Series Logo
Supermicro SuperBlade vs Cisco UCS B-Series
Compared 13% of the time
More Cisco UCS B-Series Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cisco UCS B-Series
October 2025
Cisco UCS B-Series reportDownload Cisco UCS B-Series product report
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
October 2025
Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series reportDownload Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series product report
 

Also Known As

UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-Series
No data available
 

Overview

Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity.
Cisco

Managing large computing and storage requirements with limited resources, budgets and space is a challenge. The Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY BX400 helps to solve it. It is a fully-featured blade system built from the ground up as a user-friendly and versatile IT infrastructure. Up to eight server and storage blades are all packed into a surprisingly small enclosure that is as easy to install and manage as it is to use.

Fujitsu
 

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, Talbots
Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Tokyo Stock Exchange, RAF St. Mawgan, King Fahad Medical City, St. Bede’s Catholic High School, 
Buyer's Guide
Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series
September 2025
Free Report: Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
871,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series report.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.