We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS B-Series and Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The most valuable features of the Cisco UCS B-Series are reports for virtualization and the large memory it has."
"The most valuable feature that the B-Series has is related to the structure and architecture of the solution because in these solutions, you are using fabric interconnect as an interconnect device. The beauty of fabric interconnect is that it can work as in-house mode."
"The most valuable features are monitoring and processing, which can handle a lot of throughput and are more powerful than the HPE series."
"The scalability is very good."
"The solution is stable."
"I like that it's very manageable very easy to use and configure. I am not an expert, but the graphic user interface is quite simple very easy to use. It's a complete solution."
"The feature that I found the most value is the abstract and stateless capacities."
"The Boot from SAN function is good because using OTV, we can boot the device from any remote location."
"Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series has two processors."
"This model does not support virtualization of the switch."
"The solution is difficult to set up."
"We have to have Java to manage the infrastructure. It would be great if we can manage the infrastructure through a web browser."
"The GUI is not the greatest."
"Cisco UCS B-Series competitors have similar features as they do, Cisco needs to make some changes to make their offering better."
"The graphic code that UCS can support is limited and less accessible than other systems."
"This product uses a converged network adapter because it is the only way to provide flexibility with both fiber and ethernet connections."
"Integration with storage could be improved."
"It can have more automation. In addition, Fujitsu should have a broader portfolio, not specifically in terms of the service solutions, but more in terms of the big picture. A broader portfolio would be nice for providing different solutions for the customers."
More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco UCS B-Series is ranked 3rd in Blade Servers with 15 reviews while Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is ranked 12th in Blade Servers with 1 review. Cisco UCS B-Series is rated 8.6, while Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS B-Series writes "Processing of our system has greatly improved due to the CPU, functionality and security features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series writes "Stable, easy to set up, and has two processors". Cisco UCS B-Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge M, HPE BladeSystem, Super Micro SuperBlade and Pure Storage FlashBlade, whereas Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is most compared with HPE Synergy.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
