We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS B-Series and Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers."The ratio in terms of the number of units and the number of servers that we can get each chassis is quite good."
"The GUI makes is simple to use and deploy."
"The solution is stable...The solution is scalable."
"The product is easy to use."
"The Dual Fabric design allows for online/in-service upgrades during production with no impact."
"The most valuable features of the solution are stability and security."
"In terms of the flexibility of the tool to adapt to technology needs, I think it is a very good solution."
"The most valuable feature is definitely the service profile."
"Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series has two processors."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved and made cheaper."
"Its scalability could be better."
"This model does not support virtualization of the switch."
"The UCS manager interface needs to be cleaned up a bit and can be streamlined, but no major complaints."
"The license is expensive. Cisco should decrease the delay in the delivery of their products."
"The price of this product is too high. They should work to make it more affordable."
"USC Central seems a bit confusing for technicians."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series was complex."
"It can have more automation. In addition, Fujitsu should have a broader portfolio, not specifically in terms of the service solutions, but more in terms of the big picture. A broader portfolio would be nice for providing different solutions for the customers."
More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco UCS B-Series is ranked 3rd in Blade Servers with 64 reviews while Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is ranked 13th in Blade Servers with 3 reviews. Cisco UCS B-Series is rated 8.6, while Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS B-Series writes "Robust hardware and efficient management of hardware, creating group policies, such as scrub policies and maintenance policies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series writes "A highly stable solution with technical support that is not only good but also always available to help the product's users". Cisco UCS B-Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge M, HPE BladeSystem, Super Micro SuperBlade and Pure Storage FlashBlade, whereas Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is most compared with Fujitsu CX1000, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE Synergy.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.