Cisco UCS B-Series vs Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series comparison

Cisco and Fujitsu are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Cisco is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4, while Fujitsu is ranked #14. Cisco holds a 7.6% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Fujitsu’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution.

Cisco UCS B-Series

Read 74 Cisco UCS B-Series reviews

1,130 Views
1,107 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series

Read 3 Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series reviews

174 Views
174 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS B-Series

Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Cisco UCS B-Series and Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series are enterprise-level blade server solutions focusing on efficiency and scalability. Cisco UCS B-Series holds an advantage due to its superior user interface capabilities and efficient management tools, making it easier to manage. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series provides a feature-rich design for specific enterprise needs, making it appealing despite higher costs.

Features: Cisco UCS B-Series includes advanced network connectivity, integrating Unified Fabric technology, and superior software tools for management tasks, distinguishing it in user interface features. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series offers robust system scalability, a feature-rich architecture for enterprise-specific needs, and the ability to accommodate future expansion, thus highlighting its hardware customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS B-Series provides a seamless deployment experience with comprehensive support, enhancing stability and user satisfaction through reliable infrastructure services. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series focuses on modularity and flexibility, backed by strong customer service addressing integration challenges, thus providing an adaptable deployment approach.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS B-Series typically offers competitive pricing and favorable ROI due to its management efficiency, reducing operational costs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series involves higher initial costs but offers significant long-term benefits based on its feature investments, making it a greater value proposition over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS B-Series

Ranking in Blade Servers

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series

Ranking in Blade Servers

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS B-Series is 7.6%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco UCS B-Series	7.6%
Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series	0.7%
Other	91.7%

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

DavidMbugua

Group General Manager-ICT at SkyLink

Reliable product with efficient automation capabilities

Cisco UCS B-Series manages various processes, including handling payments for over 650,000 growers, running group financials, managing human resources, and operating our main ERP system, SAP. The servers' resilience was particularly impactful. Even during power outages, the servers resumed operations from the last saved point without human intervention. The enhanced processing speed also allowed us to complete tasks that took two days in just one hour. The automation capabilities enhanced efficiency and facilitated integration with our networking components, particularly since we also used Cisco switches. The servers' security was reliable, and formal training on Cisco products made management easier. I rate the product an eight.

Read full review

Cyrille Darmon

Chief Technology Officer for E&V Group at NISKO TECH

A highly stable solution with technical support that is not only good but also always available to help the product's users

My company's IT activities are carried out with the help of the solution. My company's customers use the solution in their telecom department or for telecommunication purposes The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability. The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series should be…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that it's very manageable very easy to use and configure. I am not an expert, but the graphic user interface is quite simple very easy to use. It's a complete solution."

"It's modular."

"The feature that I found the most value is the abstract and stateless capacities."

"The most valuable feature is the service profiles."

"The solution is stable."

"The initial setup is simple, and not very complex."

"The most valuable feature is definitely the service profile."

"It is a very robust and reliable solution."

More Cisco UCS B-Series pros

"Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series has two processors."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability."

Cons

"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."

"The initial setup and service profile deployment can be tricky and should be improved for ease of use."

"Next generation support for VMware needs to be introduced as it does not support eighth-generation VMware."

"The graphic code that UCS can support is limited and less accessible than other systems."

"The integration is an area where Cisco UCS B-Series needs to provide users with more details."

"The solution’s technical support could be better."

"This model does not support virtualization of the switch."

"This product uses a converged network adapter because it is the only way to provide flexibility with both fiber and ethernet connections."

More Cisco UCS B-Series cons

"The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series was complex."

"It can have more automation. In addition, Fujitsu should have a broader portfolio, not specifically in terms of the service solutions, but more in terms of the big picture. A broader portfolio would be nice for providing different solutions for the customers."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS B-Series is not a cheap solution."

"The pricing for Cisco products is always high."

"The licensing cost is a little bit expensive because by default, it depends on your fabric interconnect model. Most of the time, however, Cisco provides a lot of promotions to the customers, so the cost can be waived for many projects. The price of the chassis itself is fair."

"Cisco UCS B-Series is an expensive solution."

"Considering our market, I rate the pricing of Cisco UCS B-Series as a six."

"It is expensive."

"Pricing will be based on your requirements so it is important to plan, engage, and negotiate directly with the Cisco Account Manager."

"Compared to the more in-demand hyper-converged environments such as Nutanix or DVX rail, Cisco UCS B-Series is even more costly due to the expensive fabric interconnects."

More Cisco UCS B-Series pricing and cost advice

"No license is required to operate the product."

"There are special licenses that are connected to the usage. We installed Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series for a high PC solution, and for this reason, some Microsoft licenses and other special licenses were embedded or bundled to the Fujitsu solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	41

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS B-Series?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easily scalable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS B-Series?

Comparing Cisco UCS B-Series with traditional servers, while its initial cost may be slightly higher, it is not as expensive as Oracle Exadata, making it a worthwhile investment. It pays off in the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS B-Series?

There is a need for Cisco UCS B-Series to evolve and scale vertically, particularly with the increasing data demands and the integration of AI, ensuring the solution remains certified and capable u...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 35% of the time

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 19% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 19% of the time

HPE BladeSystem vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 14% of the time

Supermicro SuperBlade vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 13% of the time

More Cisco UCS B-Series Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series

September 2025

Download Cisco UCS B-Series product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

August 2025

Download Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series product report

Also Known As

UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-Series

No data available

Overview

Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity.

Cisco

Managing large computing and storage requirements with limited resources, budgets and space is a challenge. The Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY BX400 helps to solve it. It is a fully-featured blade system built from the ground up as a user-friendly and versatile IT infrastructure. Up to eight server and storage blades are all packed into a surprisingly small enclosure that is as easy to install and manage as it is to use.

Fujitsu

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, Talbots

Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Tokyo Stock Exchange, RAF St. Mawgan, King Fahad Medical City, St. Bede’s Catholic High School,

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series

September 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.