Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco UCS B-Series vs Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series comparison

Cisco and Fujitsu are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Cisco is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Fujitsu is ranked #15. Cisco holds a 8.3% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Fujitsu’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution.
Cisco UCS B-Series
Read 73 Cisco UCS B-Series reviews
  • 1,200 Views
  • 798 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series
Read 3 Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series reviews
  • 134 Views
  • 59 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Cisco UCS B-Series and Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series are enterprise-level blade server solutions focusing on efficiency and scalability. Cisco UCS B-Series holds an advantage due to its superior user interface capabilities and efficient management tools, making it easier to manage. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series provides a feature-rich design for specific enterprise needs, making it appealing despite higher costs.

Features: Cisco UCS B-Series includes advanced network connectivity, integrating Unified Fabric technology, and superior software tools for management tasks, distinguishing it in user interface features. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series offers robust system scalability, a feature-rich architecture for enterprise-specific needs, and the ability to accommodate future expansion, thus highlighting its hardware customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS B-Series provides a seamless deployment experience with comprehensive support, enhancing stability and user satisfaction through reliable infrastructure services. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series focuses on modularity and flexibility, backed by strong customer service addressing integration challenges, thus providing an adaptable deployment approach.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS B-Series typically offers competitive pricing and favorable ROI due to its management efficiency, reducing operational costs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series involves higher initial costs but offers significant long-term benefits based on its feature investments, making it a greater value proposition over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS B-Series
Ranking in Blade Servers
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
73
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series
Ranking in Blade Servers
15th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS B-Series is 8.3%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is 0.5%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Blade Servers
 

Featured Reviews

DavidMbugua - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable product with efficient automation capabilities
Cisco UCS B-Series manages various processes, including handling payments for over 650,000 growers, running group financials, managing human resources, and operating our main ERP system, SAP. The servers' resilience was particularly impactful. Even during power outages, the servers resumed operations from the last saved point without human intervention. The enhanced processing speed also allowed us to complete tasks that took two days in just one hour. The automation capabilities enhanced efficiency and facilitated integration with our networking components, particularly since we also used Cisco switches. The servers' security was reliable, and formal training on Cisco products made management easier. I rate the product an eight.
Read full review
Cyrille Darmon - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly stable solution with technical support that is not only good but also always available to help the product's users
My company's IT activities are carried out with the help of the solution. My company's customers use the solution in their telecom department or for telecommunication purposes The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability. The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series should be…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The Dashboard is quite impressive and is, so far, the best based on my experience."
"It's modular."
"Stateless Blade is the best feature."
"The initial setup is simple, and not very complex."
"I like that the hardware is separated from the software definition of the components."
"The most beneficial feature is UCS Manager. It's the best way to manage hardware, creating group policies, like scrub policies and maintenance policies."
"The solution has the ability to reuse or divide the networking, making it a flexible networking environment."
"The product's tech support has good people."
More Cisco UCS B-Series pros
"Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series has two processors."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability."
 

Cons

"The GUI is not the greatest."
"The upgrades could be improved."
"Its scalability could be better."
"The product could be made more secure."
"The product pricing needs improvement."
"There is also a need for better local parts replacement, as HP is superior in this area."
"We have to have Java to manage the infrastructure. It would be great if we can manage the infrastructure through a web browser."
"There is a delay in the product's reporting and the rebooting system compared to servers from other vendors."
More Cisco UCS B-Series cons
"The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series was complex."
"It can have more automation. In addition, Fujitsu should have a broader portfolio, not specifically in terms of the service solutions, but more in terms of the big picture. A broader portfolio would be nice for providing different solutions for the customers."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Make sure you work with a vendor partner than can get you a substantial discount off of list pricing."
"The cost of the blade servers is okay, but the cost of Fabric Interconnects ends up increasing the overall costs. For example, suppose it costs 3,500 USD per blade server. When you include the Fabric Interconnects, you could pay up to 30,000 USD. Therefore, compared to the cost of servers from Lenovo, Huawei, Dell, or HP, the cost of Cisco servers can be high. However, Cisco gives good discounts (about 90% to 94%) to partners and to customers who are already using Cisco servers. New Cisco customers do not get the level of discount that an existing customer does. Because you can get discounts with Cisco, I would give pricing a rating of four out of five."
"The product cost is high."
"The product is expensive."
"Cisco UCS B-Series is not a cheap solution."
"There is a need to pay towards the licensing costs of the solution on a yearly basis. Price-wise, it is an expensive product"
"Compared to the more in-demand hyper-converged environments such as Nutanix or DVX rail, Cisco UCS B-Series is even more costly due to the expensive fabric interconnects."
"It makes much more sense for individual licenses for distributed environments"
More Cisco UCS B-Series pricing and cost advice
"There are special licenses that are connected to the usage. We installed Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series for a high PC solution, and for this reason, some Microsoft licenses and other special licenses were embedded or bundled to the Fujitsu solution."
"No license is required to operate the product."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS B-Series?
The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easily scalable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS B-Series?
The licensing cost for three years, followed by an AMC for two years, is reasonable. However, the management software, Cisco One, is priced a bit high but still considered reasonable. No additional...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cisco UCS B-Series?
Last year, we faced challenges with firmware upgrades, but they were quickly resolved with assistance from Cisco TAC.
See all answers
What do you like most about Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series?
No license is required to operate the product. Licenses are meant for products like VMware.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series?
The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series should be made easier.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs Cisco UCS B-Series Logo
HPE Synergy vs Cisco UCS B-Series
Compared 32% of the time
Dell PowerEdge M vs Cisco UCS B-Series Logo
Dell PowerEdge M vs Cisco UCS B-Series
Compared 21% of the time
HPE BladeSystem vs Cisco UCS B-Series Logo
HPE BladeSystem vs Cisco UCS B-Series
Compared 19% of the time
Supermicro SuperBlade vs Cisco UCS B-Series Logo
Supermicro SuperBlade vs Cisco UCS B-Series
Compared 14% of the time
Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs Cisco UCS B-Series Logo
Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs Cisco UCS B-Series
Compared 14% of the time
More Cisco UCS B-Series Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cisco UCS B-Series
June 2025
Cisco UCS B-Series reportDownload Cisco UCS B-Series product report
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
May 2025
Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series reportDownload Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series product report
 

Also Known As

UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-Series
No data available
 

Overview

Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity.
Cisco

Managing large computing and storage requirements with limited resources, budgets and space is a challenge. The Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY BX400 helps to solve it. It is a fully-featured blade system built from the ground up as a user-friendly and versatile IT infrastructure. Up to eight server and storage blades are all packed into a surprisingly small enclosure that is as easy to install and manage as it is to use.

Fujitsu
 

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, Talbots
Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Tokyo Stock Exchange, RAF St. Mawgan, King Fahad Medical City, St. Bede’s Catholic High School, 
Buyer's Guide
Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series
June 2025
Free Report: Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series report.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.