We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Network Analytics and LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Cisco and others in Network Detection and Response (NDR)."It has improved our internal knowledge of what's going on with the network, and that's helpful."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is the Threat Intelligence integration."
"This product alleviates the day-to-day headaches for us, in regards to metrics."
"It's a dependable product that is able to pinpoint where we have vulnerabilities if they occur."
"Stability is the most valuable feature we have seen in this solution."
"Able to drill down into a center's utilization, then create reports based on it."
"It has definitely helped us improve our mean time to resolution on network issues."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is data hoarding because it catches threats on a frequent basis that we had no idea of."
"What we like most in LogRhythm NetworkXDR is its GUI. The GUI is the best when compared to competitors. For example, there is another SIEM in QRadar and Splunk, and for open source SIEM there is Wazuh and there are other SIEM solutions, but LogRhythm NetworkXDR is more reliable and easier to access. It's easy to use and its display is easy to understand. Learning LogRhythm NetworkXDR is smooth sailing compared to other SIEM solutions."
"The visualization could be improved, the GUI is not the best."
"At my company, we might not be using it enough with other applications that we have that can integrate with it."
"The ability to be natively integrated into Port Aggregator would be beneficial because it would reduce just one more component that's needed in order to have that type of view."
"Cisco could improve the administration for the customers."
"One update that I would like to see is an agent-based client. Currently, Stealthwatch is network-based. A local agent could help manage endpoints."
"I would like the search page available with Cisco Stealthwatch to be more intuitive. The previous release was better than the current one for the UI."
"Cisco Stealthwatch can improve by having bundled packages for popular add-ons. It would be a lot easier for people implementing it, have let's say a better way to use the product."
"The overall visibility into the actual device itself would be helpful. I don't just want support-specific data, but also to be able to see information such as CPU and other internal components or usage of the devices."
"What would make LogRhythm NetworkXDR better is if they could run it open source, similar to what is being done in Wazuh, and Wazuh is also a good tool to compare against. More integration could also make LogRhythm NetworkXDR better."
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Secure Network Analytics is ranked 3rd in Network Detection and Response (NDR) with 57 reviews while LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Detection and Response (NDR) with 1 review. Cisco Secure Network Analytics is rated 8.2, while LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Network Analytics writes "Increased the visibility of what is happening in our network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] writes "Easier to learn, access, and use, and comes with an easy to understand GUI". Cisco Secure Network Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Secure Cloud Analytics, ThousandEyes, Vectra AI and Arista NDR, whereas LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors.
We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.