We performed a comparison between LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Cisco and others in Network Detection and Response (NDR)."What we like most in LogRhythm NetworkXDR is its GUI. The GUI is the best when compared to competitors. For example, there is another SIEM in QRadar and Splunk, and for open source SIEM there is Wazuh and there are other SIEM solutions, but LogRhythm NetworkXDR is more reliable and easier to access. It's easy to use and its display is easy to understand. Learning LogRhythm NetworkXDR is smooth sailing compared to other SIEM solutions."
"The sandboxing tools offer great prevention for cloud feeds."
"For those who want a next-gen firewall that's easy to configure and easy to operate, I think you should go for Palo Alto."
"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is the market leader as far as security gateways and endpoint protection. Additionally, the threat database that is used is one of the best."
"The most valuable features are that it's user-friendly, has interesting features, URL filtering, and threat prevention."
"The application control and vulnerability protection are the most valuable features."
"Edge protection is a valuable feature."
"Everything has been okay with the solution. We are using all of the features."
"The most valuable features are the simplicity, transparency, and overall ease of management."
"What would make LogRhythm NetworkXDR better is if they could run it open source, similar to what is being done in Wazuh, and Wazuh is also a good tool to compare against. More integration could also make LogRhythm NetworkXDR better."
"Mission learning techniques should continue to expand and detect unknown threats on the fly."
"It's not so easy to set up a test environment, because it's not so easy to get the test license. The vendor only gives you 90 days for a test license; it's a tough license to get."
"The installation was complicated."
"The application’s pricing and dashboard need improvement. It could be user-friendly."
"We are attempting to improve the use of URL filtering beyond threat protection."
"I think they can use some improvement on FID."
"In Africa, the technical support is probably not as good as in Europe and the USA because it's a specific premium support, partner-enabled premium support and all of that. But it's really good, I don't really have any complaints, it's fairly good. I'll give them 80%."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the only thing I don't like is the support."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Detection and Response (NDR) with 1 review while Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is ranked 7th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 24 reviews. LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] is rated 10.0, while Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] writes "Easier to learn, access, and use, and comes with an easy to understand GUI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention writes "A good amount of granularity and advanced URL filtering capabilities". LogRhythm NetworkXDR [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Check Point IPS, Arista NDR, Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall and Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System.
We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.