Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client vs Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mob...
Ranking in Cisco Security Portfolio
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
69
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (3rd)
Cisco ISE (Identity Service...
Ranking in Cisco Security Portfolio
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
139
Ranking in other categories
Network Access Control (NAC) (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Cisco Security Portfolio category, the mindshare of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is 6.1%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is 22.4%, up from 16.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cisco Security Portfolio
Unique Categories:
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
7.6%
Network Access Control (NAC)
25.7%
 

Featured Reviews

Josef Bartos - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 5, 2022
Easy to use, stable, has no connectivity issues, and allows users to work from home
In terms of areas for improvement in Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, from my point of view, the solution works well and right now I don't see the need to improve it. Probably a better user interface could be created for Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, but its core is VPN creation, and that works well, though I'm not a VPN specialist, and I'm not an expert on how to create a VPN, how the VPN gateway works, how it's implemented, and what's the architecture behind it. A two-factor authentication feature was recently added to the Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client. In the past, you only needed to log in with your username and password, but now, there's a token, and the user interface for that token isn't that good. That's another area for improvement. Cisco should also make the two-factor authentication better in the solution. What I'd like added to the Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client in its next release is a better two-factor authentication, in particular, the validity of the code being shorter because sometimes when I get the code and I add it to the client, it's invalid, though I'm unsure if it's centrally set up that way or if its a characteristic of the product. Making the interface of the Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client more user-friendly is also what I'd like to see in the next release of the solution.
Darren Hill - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 3, 2023
Offers users the ability to be able to see what devices are actually on their network
I don't really know how to improve it, I think it's a great product. If I compare Cisco with something like ClearPass, for example, ISE is a lot more intuitive in terms of all the workflows and the work centers. They give you all the building blocks you need to be able to configure it. It's quite useful and quite easy to manage. If I was going to improve anything, it would be the ease of migration. It's really difficult at the moment if you're looking to upgrade ISE 2.1 and you want to go to ISE 3.1 or 3.2, that whole upgrade path and, particularly, the licensing is quite a minefield to sort out. If I wanted anything to be easier, it would be this.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's fairly easy to set up."
"The solution has good performance. It is a simple tool to use, once I turn on Windows it automatically starts to use the VPN."
"Especially during the COVID pandemic, this solution has allowed us to work from home without security concerns."
"The most valuable feature is the connection feature."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is the one-click VPN connection. Additionally, the performance is good."
"Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is very stable."
"You don't have to think about it very much. It just works."
"It's easy to handle. You can have it on Windows, Linux or Mac, that's quite useful."
"The access policies, and all of the policies in Cisco ISE, are important to us."
"Authentication is the most valuable feature because it puts our company at another level of security."
"The valuable feature of the solution lies in its integration capabilities with other applications."
"At the moment, ISE seems to integrate very well with a number of other technologies."
"The most valuable feature is 801.1x and another very good feature is the TACACS."
"The core point is that Cisco ISE is the same globally compared to FortiAuthenticator. Whether I deploy in China, the US, South Africa, or wherever, I'm can get all the capabilities. It allows me to directly integrate with 365, and from a communications point of view, that is a good capability."
"Typically, the installation is pretty simple."
"The biggest value of ISE is that it can get so granular with gaming systems, versus IoT and BYOD."
 

Cons

"The price could be reduced."
"There is nothing they need to improve at this moment."
"There are some issues with connectivity and latency that should be improved."
"We don't have the correct visibility to see the quantity of licenses we are consuming or not consuming."
"If they could simplify connections via other machines, like Linux or Mac OS X, it would be helpful."
"I haven't found there are any shortcomings in the product. For how I use it, it works well."
"More frequent updates would be ideal."
"If there's any cloud version available, instead of on-premise, that would be ideal."
"I believe that Cisco can improve the way its policies are built because it's a little complex."
"The installation is not straightforward, it took us approximately one month."
"In a future release, I would like to see network access control. That is something that customers seem to be looking for."
"ISE is a little clunky. The front-end feels like it is from the 1980s."
"The upgrades could be better. Every time we try to do an upgrade, we have problems. It's a pain."
"Troubleshooting and multi-ISE can be challenging with the solution."
"I would definitely improve the deployment and maybe a little bit of the support. Our first exposure to ISE had a lot of issues."
"The one main thing that it can improve on is the GUI. As the newest addition to the team, I struggle a little bit to get around it just because it has so many features."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company has a three-year or a four-year license. In scenarios attached to a solution where the product may be reaching an end-of-support or end-of-life phase, Cisco provides OS support in such environments."
"There is a license needed to use this solution. There are different licensing models available, such as a three-year license."
"The price is okay."
"We are in the North African region, and Cisco products are expensive for us. On a scale from one to ten with one being very affordable and ten being expensive, I'd rate the price at eight."
"The licensing costs are reasonable."
"We pay for an annual subscription. Additionally to the subscription, we thought in order to connect this solution to the Active Directory we had to purchase a Cisco ACS, Access Control System. It turns out we did not actually need it."
"One thing I've noticed is the price in comparison to other VPNs."
"It is not a free solution and the user needs to buy license."
"Standard licensing gives backup access and very few features, and then there's VM licensing - each VM we use needs to be licensed."
"The price of the solution is price fair for the features you receive."
"The price is a bit on the high side."
"That's where things got a bit more complicated. Previously, it was a one-time purchase and we just had to renew support. These days, there's a subscription model, which is supposed to be easier and cheaper as well, but it's more pricey"
"I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, one being cheap and ten being expensive."
"The Essentials licensing is reasonable, but I would like the Premier version to be perpetual instead of a subscription."
"I believe I have paid around $1,000 in licensing fees. The license is annual."
"In general, licensing can be quite complex with Cisco products. It would be nice if it was a bit more intuitive and had fewer "gotchas" in there."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cisco Security Portfolio solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
44%
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Educational Organization
24%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client?
The tool is user-friendly, robust and easy to use in any environment.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client?
My company has a three-year or a four-year license. In scenarios attached to a solution where the product may be reaching an end-of-support or end-of-life phase, Cisco provides OS support in such e...
What needs improvement with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client?
The security of the product has certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required.
Which is better - Aruba Clearpass or Cisco ISE?
Aruba ClearPass is a Network Access Control tool that gives secure network access to multiple device types. You can adapt the policies to VPN access, wired, or wireless access. You can securely ...
What are the main differences between Cisco ISE and Forescout Platform?
OK, so Cisco ISE uses 802.1X to secure switchports against unauthorized access. The drawback of this is that ISE cannot secure the port if a device does not support 802.1x. Cameras, badge readers, ...
How does Cisco ISE compare with Fortinet FortiNAC?
Cisco ISE uses AI endpoint analytics to identify new devices based on their behavior. It will also notify you if someone plugs in with a device that is not allowed and will block it. The user exper...
 

Also Known As

Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility, AnyConnect Secure Mobility, Cisco AnyConnect, AnyConnect
Cisco ISE
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

MST, Molina Healthcare, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers, Arup, New South Wales Rural FireService
Aegean Motorway, BC Hydro, Beachbody, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Cisco IT, Derby City Council, Global Banking Customer, Gobierno de Castilla-La Mancha, Houston Methodist, Linz AG, London Hydro, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Molina Healthcare, MST Systems, New South Wales Rural Fire Service, Reykjavik University, Wildau University
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client vs. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.