Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024
Observer GigaStor and Checkmk are competing products in the network monitoring category. Checkmk appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive monitoring capabilities and flexible deployment.
Features: Observer GigaStor specializes in granular traffic analysis with advanced packet capture and long-term data storage, making it ideal for network forensics. Checkmk provides a versatile monitoring scope with its plugin architecture, offering features such as server, application, and cloud monitoring.
Room for Improvement: Observer GigaStor could enhance its flexibility and offer more integration with non-networking IT components. It may also benefit from a more cost-effective licensing model. Additionally, streamlining initial setup processes could improve user experience. Checkmk might improve by offering more advanced traffic analysis features similar to those of GigaStor. Enhancing hardware options for environments lacking appropriate server infrastructure could be beneficial. Increased focus on direct customer support channels could complement its existing community support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Observer GigaStor's hardware appliance setup can be resource-intensive initially, but it is compensated by robust post-deployment support and training. Checkmk's software-based deployment is straightforward, integrating easily into existing systems, bolstered by comprehensive documentation and thriving community resources.
Pricing and ROI: Observer GigaStor involves a higher upfront investment, mainly due to hardware costs, which impacts initial ROI but holds substantial value for detailed traffic analysis needs. Checkmk offers a flexible licensing model, presenting a cost-effective alternative with a quicker ROI for extensive monitoring without substantial CAPEX investments.
To learn more, read our detailed
Checkmk vs. Observer GigaStor Report (Updated: April 2025).
