Checkmk vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Checkmk and Kaseya are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Checkmk is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.4, while Kaseya is ranked #67 with an average rating of 6.3. Checkmk holds a 3.8% mindshare in NMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

Checkmk

Read 9 Checkmk reviews

3,637 Views
3,176 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

465 Views
269 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Checkmk

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Kaseya Traverse and Checkmk are network monitoring solutions. Checkmk might have the upper hand due to its robust features, despite Kaseya Traverse being preferred for pricing and support.

Features: Kaseya Traverse offers comprehensive monitoring, extensive integration options, and detailed insights. Checkmk provides flexibility with complex setup, advanced monitoring capabilities, and customization options.

Room for Improvement: Kaseya Traverse can improve its configuration complexity, detailed insights, and flexibility. Checkmk needs enhancements in deployment efficiency, customer support accessibility, and ease of setup.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaseya Traverse is straightforward to deploy with excellent support, ensuring quick setup and assistance. Checkmk requires more time to deploy but offers extensive documentation, making resources available for those who need them.

Pricing and ROI: Kaseya Traverse's competitive pricing appeals to budget-conscious organizations with good ROI. Checkmk offers a free tier and customizable pricing, which suits various budgets. Kaseya provides affordability, while Checkmk justifies investment for comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. Kaseya Traverse

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 852,780 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

10th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (12th)

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

67th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

38th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 3.8%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala

Application performance and System monitoring at Agos

A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring

The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.

Read full review

Dominique Yeates

Senior Product Manager Managed IT at Vox Telecom

A stable network monitoring tool requiring an easy initial setup phase

In terms of the integration and everything, our company would like Kaseya Traverse to integrate with our PSA system and merge or automate what we call false positives, making it more of a threshold than needing to raise an actual ticket to deal with real problems, which can cut off a lot of noise the system goes through. Our company is busy with the solution's integration part, and we wanted an update on the solution that can help us. The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently. I don't have a technical wish list like technical managers since the product manager looks after the product. From a wish list perspective, our company just wants seamless integration to cut out the noise by merging false positives since the system has the capability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, from one to ten, I rate Checkmk a nine."

"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."

"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

"I really like the auto-discovery feature."

"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."

"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."

"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."

"Checkmk was built on a platform that was user-friendly, and I could build my charts easily."

More Checkmk pros

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"Checkmk does not work too easily with the PowerStore. I use a PowerShell script as Checkmk runs on Linux and a Windows system, connecting with the Checkmk agent."

"Checkmk does not allow running scripts at varying intervals."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."

More Checkmk cons

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

"The product is affordable."

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

852,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

31%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

I will get more information about Checkmk when the proof of concept is done. It's going to be before the summer. There will be a report about the tool and a recommendation to use it. So far, it loo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

Checkmk ( /products/checkmk-reviews ) is a monitoring tool, so that's what I will use it for. Right now, it's not in production, but it's in a proof of concept phase. It looks good, so probably, du...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?

The remote support and data collection features are great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?

The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpfu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 47% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 9% of the time

LibreNMS vs Checkmk

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

Observium vs Checkmk

Compared 3% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 49% of the time

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 27% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 24% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

May 2025

Download Checkmk product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

May 2025

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Overview

Checkmk is a powerful tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, providing vital insights on servers, databases, network devices, and custom applications.

Primarily used for supervising IT infrastructure, Checkmk helps organizations ensure service availability by monitoring hosts, processes, load, storage, and network appliances. With support for both Linux and Windows environments across multiple data centers, Checkmk performs compliance checks and preserves historical data for core network devices.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-discovery: Automatically identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules.
Custom monitoring: Enhances MySQL performance tracking.
Slack integration: Provides immediate downtime alerts.
Graphical trend analysis: Offers 400 days of trend data.
Multiple site monitoring: Ensures seamless data synchronization through task automation.
Resource and infrastructure monitoring: Configures log factors to fit budget constraints.
System metric imports: Includes servers, SQL, file systems, and application monitoring.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Time-saving: Auto-discovery and task automation streamline processes.
Proactive alerts: Immediate downtime notifications optimize response times.
Historical insights: Long-term graphical trend analysis aids strategic planning.
Cost efficiency: Resource monitoring aligned with budget constraints.

Checkmk is deployed extensively in large enterprise environments for monitoring critical infrastructure. It proves particularly useful under conditions of frequent power outages or network issues, helping maintain smooth operations. While the alert acknowledgment process and interface require improvements, and the lack of an agent-less platform complicates server management, the strengths in auto-discovery, integration, and comprehensive monitoring make Checkmk a strong contender for IT infrastructure monitoring.

Checkmk

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. Kaseya Traverse

May 2025

Free Report: Checkmk vs. Kaseya Traverse

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

852,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmk vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.