We compared Black Duck and JFrog Security Essentials based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
In summary, Black Duck excels in comprehensive code scanning and open-source software management, with positive customer service feedback. JFrog Security Essentials stands out for its outstanding customer support and advanced security features, with competitive pricing. However, Black Duck needs improvement in user interface and documentation, while JFrog should focus on UI and performance enhancements.
Features: Black Duck's valuable features include comprehensive code scanning, open source software management, real-time vulnerability alerts, customizable dashboards, and integration with development tools. JFrog Security Essentials offers comprehensive security, seamless integration, efficient vulnerability scanning, reliable artifact analysis, and proactive alert notifications.
Pricing and ROI: Black Duck's setup cost is intuitive and adaptable, with flexible pricing options. On the other hand, JFrog Security Essentials offers a straightforward and hassle-free setup cost, ensuring a smooth installation process with flexible licensing agreements., The ROI from Black Duck has been positive according to user feedback. Users found JFrog Security Essentials to be highly effective in enhancing security measures, mitigating risks, and safeguarding valuable assets.
Room for Improvement: Black Duck could benefit from improving the user interface, search functionality, performance, and documentation. JFrog Security Essentials needs enhancements for its user interface, performance, documentation, and additional features for a more robust security solution.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews suggest that there may be variations in the duration required for establishing a new tech solution, depending on the specific context. For Black Duck, one user spent three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, while another user spent a week on both. As for JFrog Security Essentials, one user took three months for deployment and an extra week for setup, while another user took a week for both. These differences highlight the contrasting approaches to deployment and setup between Black Duck and JFrog Security Essentials., Black Duck's customer service receives positive feedback for their efficient assistance, responsiveness, and willingness to go above and beyond. JFrog Security Essentials excels in providing outstanding customer service with promptness, professionalism, and going the extra mile to resolve issues.
The summary above is based on 12 interviews we conducted recently with Black Duck and JFrog Security Essentials users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The solution works well on Mac products."
"It is able to drill down to the source level."
"The installation is very easy."
"The most valuable feature of Black Duck is the seamless integration to scan our Docker binary files, it provides us all open vulnerabilities, and it ensures a reference point from where it finds the vulnerability is up to date. For example, if there is any new vulnerability found, they are immediately available in the Black Duck. There is no delay in finding the vulnerabilities, they are called out in our code immediately."
"It highlights what the developers have done, and it shows the impact from an intellectual property point of view."
"The solution is very good at scanning and evaluating open source software."
"The UI is the solution's most valuable feature since it allows for easy pipeline integration."
"The solution is stable."
"JFrog Xray's reporting feature has a lot of options in it, including scanning."
"JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code."
"Good reporting functionalities."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The most valuable feature of JFrog Xray is the display of the entire internal dependencies hierarchy."
"If multiple dependencies and vulnerabilities are found in a project, JFrog Xray is intelligent enough to tell you which vulnerability to target first."
"I would say that this solution has helped our organization by allowing us to automate a lot of the processes."
"I would like to see more integration with other solutions, such as IntelliJ IDEA."
"It is a cloud-only solution. In many cases, companies like to evaluate the software, but they're very reluctant to give you the software. It would be great if they could offer an on-prem component that could be used to scan the code and then upload the discovery results to the cloud and get all the information from there, but there is no such possibility. You have to upload the code to the Black Duck cloud system. Of course, they have a strong legal department, and they offer some configuration, but it is never enough. You have to give the code, which is a drawback. In modern designs like Snyk or FOSSA, you don't need to give the code. It requires more native integration with Coverity because they go together technically. You need both Coverity and Black Duck Hub. It would be really helpful for companies working in this space to get a combined offer from the same company. They should provide an option to buy Coverity for an additional fee. Coverity combined with Black Duck Hub will provide a one-step analysis to get everything you need and a unified report. It would be really great to be able to connect Black Duck Hub with Coverity unified reports."
"We have been having some issues with the latest releases where we are not able to scan our applications with the help of Black Duck."
"The tool needs to improve its pricing. Its configuration is complex and can be improved."
"It needs to be more user-friendly for developers and in general, to ensure compliance."
"The documentation is quite scattered."
"The solution's pricing model and documentation areas of concern where improvement is needed."
"The initial setup could be simplified. It was somewhat complex."
"JFrog Xray does not have a dashboard."
"Reporting is crucial, but it is lacking in the current tool. Every organization seeks specific data points rather than general information. Therefore, we require customized reports from the Xray tool."
"Since we have been using the solution via APIs, there are some limitations in the APIs."
"JFrog Xray's documentation and error logging could be improved."
"The speed of JFrog Xray should improve. Other solutions have better performance."
"Lacks deeper reporting, the ability to compare things."
"I think that the user interface should be expanded to provide customers with a better dashboard for reviewing their feedback regarding their images and the vulnerabilities that are associated with the images."
Black Duck is ranked 1st in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 16 reviews while JFrog Xray is ranked 7th in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 7 reviews. Black Duck is rated 7.8, while JFrog Xray is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Black Duck writes "Enables applications to be secure, but it must provide more open APIs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JFrog Xray writes "An intelligent solution that prioritizes which vulnerability to target first in your project". Black Duck is most compared with Snyk, Fortify Static Code Analyzer, Mend.io, FOSSA and Sonatype Lifecycle, whereas JFrog Xray is most compared with Snyk, Veracode, Mend.io, Fortify Static Code Analyzer and Sonatype Repository Firewall. See our Black Duck vs. JFrog Xray report.
See our list of best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.
We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
