Checkmarx One vs Xops comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Checkmarx and AXIOMIO are both solutions in the AI Security category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3, while AXIOMIO is ranked #26 with an average rating of 9.0. Checkmarx holds a 1.1% mindshare in AAS, compared to AXIOMIO’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AXIOMIO users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

30,538 Views
3,359 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Xops

Read 4 Xops reviews

2,677 Views
750 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Xops

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Xops based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two AI Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Xops Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Xops

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in AI Security

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (12th), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (5th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (9th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (4th)

Xops

Ranking in AI Security

26th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (28th), Compliance Management (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the AI Security category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 1.1%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Xops is 0.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	1.1%
Xops	0.3%
Other	98.6%

AI Security

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Sabb Sabb

CEO at Rexha Technologies

User interface needs refinement while providing robust security and cost management

Xops helps me with cloud finance management by allowing me to monitor my spending, and just a couple of months ago, I noticed that my AWS bill, which usually hovers around 50k monthly, spiked unexpectedly. I received an alert on the dashboard and via email about a sudden increase in usage, enabling me to rectify the actual problem and bring things back to normal. The best features of Xops, in my experience, include the FinOps component for checking unnecessary spending trends, the cloud security features, and the cybersecurity and workload security features that allow me to frequently check for vulnerabilities on images and websites. The cloud security feature of Xops stands out to me because it helps maintain compliance status by providing multiple compliance checks, including ISO and CIS benchmarks, and it is not limited to AWS, as it also includes Azure cloud scans and O365 cloud scans, allowing me to monitor security across various platforms. Other useful features of Xops include asset management tools and automation scripts, which help me check what assets I have across all regions, giving me a global view whenever I need it. Xops has positively impacted my organization by enabling me to save money and proactively detect issues, especially related to cloud spending, while also improving my routine security checks for any misconfigurations. While some metrics are difficult to quantify, I regularly run scans to catch security vulnerabilities that may arise due to changing user settings.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have been using this product extensively for a lot of applications to identify as well as employ proper remediation which makes the application secure including information issues which might get neglected with a manual code review process."

"The most valuable feature is the application tracking reporting."

"Apart from software scanning, software composition scanning is valuable."

"The best features Checkmarx One offers, in my opinion, are that it is easy to use, and there is not much deep diving into this."

"Checkmarx One has positively impacted my organization because in the past, when Checkmarx One scan was not implemented, we faced a lot of issues finding vulnerabilities inside the repository, but now, since we have integrated Checkmarx One into our repository, we can smoothly and very easily find vulnerabilities and manage those effectively."

"It moved our organization towards being agile vs. waterfall."

"Providing the scanning ability that shows the errors at the source code level is critical to have effective development of any critical application."

"It allows for SAST scanning of uncompiled code. Further, it natively integrates with all key repos formats (Git, TFS, SVN, Perforce, etc)."

More Checkmarx One pros

"Xops has positively impacted my organization by enabling me to save money and proactively detect issues, especially related to cloud spending, while also improving my routine security checks for any misconfigurations."

"Xops helped us mitigate the frequent external attacks that we have been trying to curb for a long time now, and more importantly, it helps with an easy-to-understand dashboard where I can monitor the services in use, optimizations, and ultimately the costs."

"The automated compliance monitoring reduced our manual security audits by 60%, allowing our team to focus on strategic initiatives rather than repetitive checks."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution include the Cloud FinOps Dashboards and the vulnerability scans."

"X-Ops has significantly improved our organization by streamlining cloud cost governance and enhancing the security posture across our AWS trading environment."

"The AWS cost optimization features have been game-changing - particularly the automated detection of idle EC2 instances and unattached EBS volumes that were silently draining our budget."

Cons

"They should make it more container-friendly and optimized for the CI pipeline. They should make it a little less heavy. Right now, it requires a SQL database, and the way the tool works is that it has an engine and then it has an analysis database in which it stores the information. So, it is pretty heavy from that perspective because you have to have a full SQL Server. They're working on something called Checkmarx Light, which is a slim-down version. They haven't released it yet, but that's what we need. There should be something a little more slimmed down that can just run the analysis and output the results in a format that's readable as opposed to having a full, really big, and thick deployment with a full database server."

"Checkmarx reports many false positives that we need to manually segregate and mark “Not exploitable”."

"Unfortunately, Checkmarx doesn't do any automated backups which is quite inconvenient."

"It takes around 30 to 40 minutes for checking a build. If you can make it within five minutes or 10 minutes, that would be great."

"We felt like we were the extended quality organization for Checkmarx as they frequently released poor quality patches that broke the existing functionality."

"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."

"In terms of dashboarding, the solution could provide a little more flexibility in terms of creating more dashboards. It has some of its own dashboards that come out of the box. However, if I have to implement my own dashboards that are aligned to my organization's requirements, that dashboarding feature has limited capability right now."

"The interactive application security testing, or IAST, the interactive part where you're looking at an application that lives in a runtime environment on a server or virtual machine, needs improvement."

More Checkmarx One cons

"While Xops delivers on core functionality, the platform could benefit from more mature AI models for anomaly detection."

"I chose four out of five because I believe more UI enhancements and a cleaner UX navigation could elevate it to a perfect five."

"I do not have notes for improvements."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users."

"The solution is costly."

"If you want more, you have to pay more. You have to pay for additional modules or functionalities."

"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."

"Its price is fair. It is in or around the right spot. Ultimately, if the price is wrong, customers won't commit, but they do tend to commit. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

36%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Xops?

I recommend ensuring you fully understand the pricing tiers and the features included at each level. You should evaluate it based on your actual cloud usage and security needs. X-Ops offers strong ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Xops?

I would like to see built-in anomaly detection for trading patterns using machine learning. It would also be helpful to have customizable dashboards for each business unit. Native support for cross...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Xops?

I use X-Ops to monitor and optimize AWS infrastructure costs for our trading workloads. It helps me ensure continuous security compliance and real-time threat detection. Additionally, I automate de...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 22% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

IBM Kubecost vs Xops

Compared 15% of the time

Densify vs Xops

Compared 12% of the time

Drata vs Xops

Compared 12% of the time

n8n vs Xops

Compared 11% of the time

Spot by Flexera vs Xops

Compared 7% of the time

More Xops Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

October 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

October 2026

Download Xops product report

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

Xops offers a robust platform for AWS infrastructure optimization, security compliance, and cost monitoring, delivering real-time alerts and efficient asset discovery for enhanced operational efficiency.

Xops provides users with automated tools for optimizing AWS infrastructure and securing cloud environments. With its AI-driven insights, users can optimize costs, detect threats, and improve their security posture through proactive monitoring and compliance checks. It facilitates asset discovery and automates the detection of idle resources, contributing to significant cost reductions and enhanced security. However, there is room to improve the AI models for anomaly detection and the user experience for more intuitive features. Expanding native support to platforms like GCP and incorporating cross-account resource dependency mapping would greatly enhance functionality. Enhanced dashboards and an interactive AI assistant can further boost user engagement.

What are Xops' essential features?

FinOps Dashboards: Provide detailed insights into cloud expenses and savings opportunities.
AWS Cost Optimization: Identifies idle resources to reduce unnecessary costs.
Vulnerability Scans: Continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities across platforms.
AI-Driven Insights: Delivers intelligence for threat detection and prevention.
Cross-Platform Security: Includes comprehensive checks for AWS, Azure, and O365.

Why should users consider Xops?

Cost Savings: Automatic idle resource detection leads to significant savings.
Improved Security: Real-time alerts bolster the security posture.
Operational Efficiency: Automated management reduces manual interventions.
Proactive Monitoring: Catches unexpected spending through real-time alerts.

Xops finds its application across industries seeking cloud management solutions, particularly in sectors prioritizing cybersecurity and cost management. Enterprises employ its capabilities for ensuring compliance with standards such as CIS and ISO 27001, conducting cybersecurity measures like DAST scans, and streamlining operational processes through automated deployments. Its deployment enhances financial operations and strengthens security protocols.

AXIOMIO

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Xops

September 2026

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Xops

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Xops and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Xops report.

See our list of best AI Security vendors.

We monitor all AI Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.