We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and XM Cyber based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The reports are very good because they include details on the code level, and make suggestions about how to fix the problems."
"I like that you don't have to compile the code in order to execute static code analysis. So, it's very handy."
"The solution has good performance, it is able to compute in 10 to 15 minutes."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is that its number of false positives is less than the other security application platforms. Its ease of use is another good feature. It also supports most of the languages."
"What I like best about Checkmarx is that it has fewer false positives than other products, giving you better results."
"The most valuable feature is that it actually identifies the different criteria you can set to meet whatever standards you're trying to get your system accredited for."
"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."
"The setup is very easy. There is a lot of information in the documents which makes the install not difficult at all."
"The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation."
"What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable."
"The reports are good, but they still need to be improved considering what the UI offers."
"There is nothing particular that I don't like in this solution. It can have more integrations, but the integrations that we would like are in the roadmap anyway, and they just need to deliver the roadmap. What I like about the roadmap is that it is going where it needs to go. If I were to look at the roadmap, there is nothing that is jumping out there that says to me, "Yeah. I'd like something else on the roadmap." What they're looking to deliver is what I would expect and forecast them to deliver."
"Checkmarx has a slightly difficult compilation with the CI/CD pipeline."
"Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation."
"You can't use it in the continuous delivery pipeline because the scanning takes too much time."
"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."
"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."
"The product's reporting feature could be better. The feature works well for developers, but reports generated to be shared with external parties are poor, it lacks the details one gets when viewing the results directly from the Checkmarx One platform."
"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas."
"We'd like to see a cheaper price."
Checkmarx One is ranked 11th in Vulnerability Management with 67 reviews while XM Cyber is ranked 26th in Vulnerability Management with 2 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while XM Cyber is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of XM Cyber writes "Reliable with no false-positives and helpful support". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas XM Cyber is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach, Tenable Security Center and Picus Security. See our Checkmarx One vs. XM Cyber report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
