Checkmarx One vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Checkmarx and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3, while Tenable is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.6. Checkmarx holds a 10.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 71 Checkmarx One reviews

20,870 Views
16,905 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 17 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

2,098 Views
1,636 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Checkmarx One and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are notable web security solutions. Checkmarx One is viewed favorably for its pricing and support, while Tenable.io is preferred for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Checkmarx One offers effective vulnerability identification, seamless integration capabilities, and user-friendly navigation. Tenable.io provides extensive scanning options, detailed reporting, and broad compatibility with different platforms.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could improve reporting functionalities, reduce false positives, and enhance user interface intuitiveness. Tenable.io needs to decrease scan times, improve accuracy, and streamline user experience complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One features straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. Tenable.io has a robust deployment model but receives mixed reviews on customer service response time.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One's costs are seen as reasonable with a strong return on investment. Tenable.io, although initially more expensive, delivers value over time with its advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (23rd), Container Security (22nd), Static Code Analysis (3rd), API Security (4th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (4th), DevSecOps (4th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (9th)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.3%, down from 13.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Syed Hasan

Specialist Leader at Deloitte

Partner experiences excellent technical support and seamless initial setup

In my opinion, if we are able to extract or show the report, and because everything is going towards agent tech and GenAI, it would be beneficial if it could get integrated with our code base and do the fix automatically. It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from. This would be really helpful.

Read full review

Harshal Deshmukh

CEO and Managing Director at Digidata Infsystems Private Limited

Simple tool to use, good dashboard capabilities and offers asset criticality ratings

It has good dashboard capabilities and gives good results with priority ratings, asset criticality ratings, and exposure scores for vulnerabilities. It also provides automated web application scanning, which customers appreciate because it doesn't disturb the web application or hamper the business. While testing the web application, sometimes it happens that the website or application goes down. But with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it doesn't affect the business. It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Most valuable features include: ease of use, dashboard. interface and the ability to report."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the Best Fix Location and the Payments option because you can save a lot of time trying to mitigate the configuration. Using these tools can save you a lot of time."

"Vulnerability details is valuable."

"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things. It also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."

"The main benefit to using this solution is that we find vulnerabilities in our software before the development cycle is complete."

"Helps us check vulnerabilities in our SAP Fiori application."

"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."

"The UI is very intuitive and simple to use."

More Checkmarx One pros

"It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on."

"All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is highly stable. I rate it a nine out ten. Since the solution works on the Cloud, it's highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The setup of the solution is straightforward. The Return on Investment is substantial. I recommend the solution to all."

"We use the tool for our websites. We have a vulnerable subdomain. The tool helps to scan it for vulnerabilities."

"I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning to others."

"Now that the license is centralized, it's a significant feature to manipulate assets based on their functions."

"We can get detailed information about vulnerabilities."

"It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management."

"The most valuable features of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are the integration into specific use cases and scanning. All of the features of the solution are useful."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"Licensing models and Swift language support are the aspects in which this product needs to improve. Swift is a new language, in which major customers require support for lower prices."

"You can't use it in the continuous delivery pipeline because the scanning takes too much time."

"It would be really helpful if the level of confidence was included, with respect to identified issues."

"The validation process needs to be sped up."

"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."

"The tool is currently quite static in terms of finding security vulnerabilities. It would be great if it was more dynamic and we had even more tools at our disposal to keep us safe. It would help if there was more scanning or if the process was more automated."

"The product's reporting feature could be better. The feature works well for developers, but reports generated to be shared with external parties are poor, it lacks the details one gets when viewing the results directly from the Checkmarx One platform."

"The integration could improve by including, for example, DevSecOps."

More Checkmarx One cons

"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."

"The technical support should be improved. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not."

"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."

"The dashboard could be more user-friendly."

"The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly."

"The report customization needs to be better."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning could improve by offering faster fuzzing."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning conducts a general scan, which wastes time. The scan needs to be specific."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."

"If you want more, you have to pay more. You have to pay for additional modules or functionalities."

"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."

"The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users."

"The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."

"The solution is costly."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is okay."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

Improvements could include providing coverage reports in the free version and features related to security reports. Also, enhancing technical support would be beneficial as there is room for improv...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning as it provides us with good reports, which help improve our code base, despite the lack of financial benefits. Overall, I would rate it seven o...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 40% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 9% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 20% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 9% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 3% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

August 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

July 2025

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

July 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.