Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Skyhigh Security comparison

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Read 72 Skyhigh Security reviews

9,219 Views
1,383 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

Skyhigh Security and Check Point WAF both compete in the cybersecurity category, providing robust security solutions. Skyhigh Security seems to have the upper hand due to its significant return on investment and stronger cloud visibility.

Features: Skyhigh Security offers strong data protection, real-time threat analytics, and Zero Trust access, eliminating the need for VPNs. Check Point WAF provides AI-driven threat prevention, OWASP Top 10 protection, and API security, offering comprehensive application security.

Room for Improvement: Skyhigh Security users suggest enhancing the complexity of its pricing model and addressing the steep learning curve associated with managing complex security environments. Check Point WAF could improve its pricing complexity, increase user interface intuitiveness, and refine API integration for more seamless operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Skyhigh Security is praised for its straightforward deployment and robust customer service support, which quickly addresses user issues. Check Point WAF is noted for its quick deployment time and responsive customer service, although some find room for improvement in the initial setup process.

Pricing and ROI: Although Skyhigh Security is considered expensive, users deem its cost reasonable compared to its efficiency gains. Check Point WAF is priced high but offers considerable value, making it a cost-effective alternative to in-house security teams and yielding a high return on investment through its comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: July 2026).

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.2

Check Point WAF boosts cost savings, efficiency, and security, enhancing ROI through reduced ownership costs and streamlined operations.

Sentiment score

5.0

Skyhigh Security enhances efficiency, reduces manual tasks, and improves governance, though exact financial benefits are hard to quantify.

When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.

Thanos Constantopoulos

Manager, Managed Security Services at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

With Skyhigh Security, that same analysis could often be reduced to around ten minutes

RafaelMartins

Sales Engineer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

By moving to having more in the cloud, their cloud is automatically updated as part of a SaaS solution, which reduces the responsibility on the company to do the updates themselves.

For more quotes and insights, download the Skyhigh Security report

Manager - Cyber Security at a educational organization with 1-10 employees

I have seen a return on investment from using Skyhigh Security; we saved a lot of time since the dashboard gives the complete picture of the overall usage of cloud apps.

Balu Paulraj

Cloud Operations Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.5

Check Point WAF support is responsive and knowledgeable but occasionally delayed, needing improvement in service proficiency and availability.

Sentiment score

7.3

Skyhigh Security's customer service is rated high, but technical support needs improvement in consistency and first-contact resolution.

They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

We can know the case severity such as P1, P2, or P3, allowing easy interaction from the customer support side.

Karthik Sathivel

Technical Associate Network Security at Valuepoint Systems

Weekly setup calls are conducted with all clients to discuss ongoing issues and resolutions.

DeepakGupta_

Deputy Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

There is also some really good diagnostic information built into their web gateways that they deploy on-premise if you want to do hybrid, so they get a lot of information before you even know something might be wrong.

For more quotes and insights, download the Skyhigh Security report

Manager - Cyber Security at a educational organization with 1-10 employees

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.2

Check Point WAF excels with scalable, cloud-native design, seamless AWS integration, and adaptable SaaS deployment for multi-cloud support.

Sentiment score

6.6

Skyhigh Security is highly scalable and adaptable, despite occasional documentation overload and portal slowdowns in cloud environments.

If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.

Ruben Ruiz

Sr. VP of Creative & Development at a non-tech company with 51-200 employees

Scalability-wise, for monitoring cloud apps, Skyhigh Security is more scalable, and we never faced any scalability issues on the dashboards.

Balu Paulraj

Cloud Operations Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

They have peering agreements with a lot of the major ISPs where their data centers are, which allows them to get a really good bandwidth allocation.

For more quotes and insights, download the Skyhigh Security report

Manager - Cyber Security at a educational organization with 1-10 employees

We upgraded with a plan for the next five to seven years to run with this solution because this easy scalability is what we are able to achieve with Skyhigh Security for our environment.

Pratap Roy

Security Consultant at RL

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.2

Check Point WAF is praised for its exceptional stability and reliability, with users rating it highly for performance and robustness.

Sentiment score

7.5

Skyhigh Security is largely stable and reliable, with improvements and multi-location capabilities but some regional gaps remain.

It is very stable.

RicardoFernandes1

Team Leader, Cloudops & Cloud Architect at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees

It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.

Rui Dias

Sysadmin at a government with 501-1,000 employees

I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

We did not face any downtime on that site, so it is quite reliable.

Karthik Sathivel

Technical Associate Network Security at Valuepoint Systems

If your primary location is down, you just get diverted to the other one.

For more quotes and insights, download the Skyhigh Security report

Manager - Cyber Security at a educational organization with 1-10 employees

It has many gaps, so I think some customers take three months and up to six months for the deployment of Skyhigh Security.

Eunsok Kim

Secure at ESCARE COLtd

Room For Improvement

Check Point WAF requires improvements in customization, integration, pricing, and support, with users desiring simplified setup and enhanced features.

Skyhigh Security needs enhancements in reporting, support, API capabilities, and performance to improve user experience and efficiency.

The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.

Kresimir Mikolcevic

Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.

reviewer2702679

Technical Support Executive at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

There is no API available.

reviewer2847426

Security automation specialist at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Skyhigh Security does not have a local representative in the Philippines.

reviewer2866380

Product Team Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Skyhigh has its own DLP which is helping users not upload sensitive documents to the AI chatbot, making that a main good feature.

reviewer2867868

Information Security Specialist at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Skyhigh Security report

Setup Cost

Check Point WAF is seen as costly but justified by its robust features, flexible licensing, and ease of renewal.

Skyhigh Security offers flexible yet potentially higher pricing, with costs depending on user numbers and required features.

It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.

Baruch Peretz

Ciso at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

After switching, cost savings would be in the millions since we were having many VPN edge routers, and there were many VPN tunnels utilized on the cloud, and after moving to ZTNA, we were able to cut the cost.

reviewer2867868

Information Security Specialist at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

The pricing and licensing was generally aligned with the number of users and the models, and the cost depends on the scope, but I think Skyhigh Security has great pricing for the market.

RafaelMartins

Sales Engineer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Regarding pricing, the licensing and pricing for Skyhigh Security, especially for SWG, is cheap.

reviewer2866380

Product Team Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Skyhigh Security report

Valuable Features

Check Point WAF offers AI-driven protection with easy deployment, low false positives, scalability, and integration with Azure, enhancing security.

Skyhigh Security excels in security through tokenization, analytics, and compliance, simplifying tool integration and enhancing remote access.

Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.

Domenico Cacciari

Amministratore Della Sicurezza Di Rete at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Skyhigh Security dashboard helps monitor security threats, and it works well with very large enterprise environments.

Balu Paulraj

Cloud Operations Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

By going through their Zero Trust interface, we effectively had single sign-on to the internal network remotely without a VPN, so it reduced the overhead and gave us faster access to the files.

For more quotes and insights, download the Skyhigh Security report

Manager - Cyber Security at a educational organization with 1-10 employees

The hardware and cloud usability features help my team by providing easy scalability, which is the main advantage.

reviewer2842041

Senior Associate at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (5th), DevSecOps (2nd)

Skyhigh Security

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (7th), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (7th), ZTNA as a Service (10th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Skyhigh Security is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	0.7%
Skyhigh Security	1.0%
Other	98.3%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

DeepakGupta_

Deputy Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Centralized cloud security has improved DLP incident management and simplifies email protection

One major challenge is that downloading incidents during the investigation process takes a very long time, and this issue should be resolved. More customized columns and filtering options in incident review would be beneficial. File types should be included, such as file names along with file extensions, which are not currently available to my knowledge. Overall, Skyhigh Security is very good and just needs to improve in terms of the latency of downloading incidents.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	34

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	34
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

What needs improvement with McAfee Web Gateway?

From my perspective as a distributor and based on feedback from my clients, Skyhigh Security has a bit of a disadvantage in the Philippines. First, Skyhigh Security is not offering the full SASE su...

What is your primary use case for McAfee Web Gateway?

I do not use Skyhigh Security firsthand, but M.Tech Philippines distributes Skyhigh Security as one of the authorized distributors. My main use case for Skyhigh Security in my role as a distributor...

What advice do you have for others considering McAfee Web Gateway?

I always believe that Skyhigh Security works hand-in-hand with Trellix. What we are doing in our approach is to deliver the whole use case from an end-to-end approach, and from on-premises to cloud...

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 7% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

Netskope vs Skyhigh Security

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Skyhigh Security

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Skyhigh Security

Compared 6% of the time

Forcepoint ONE vs Skyhigh Security

Compared 6% of the time

Acreto SASE Plus vs Skyhigh Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Skyhigh Security Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

August 2026

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Download Skyhigh Security product report

July 2026

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

McAfee MVISION Cloud, McAfee MVISION Unified Cloud Edge, McAfee Web Gateway, McAfee MVISION CNAPP, and Skyhigh Networks, McAfee Web Gateway

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Check Point Software Technologies

Check Point Software Technologies

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Skyhigh Security provides comprehensive protection with features like user behavior analytics, shadow IT identification, and data loss prevention. Its integration with IT infrastructure offers robust security insights and helps maintain compliance.

Skyhigh Security offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies navigation while delivering substantial threat protection. It enhances existing IT infrastructure integration, such as DLP and Active Directory, to strengthen security. Yet, there is room for improvement in report generation speed, interface intuitiveness, and integration with other products. Organizations utilize Skyhigh Security to audit internet behavior, secure cloud environments and control web content. It effectively manages data movement and ensures compliance, while preventing unauthorized access and bandwidth misuse.

What are the key features of Skyhigh Security?

Shadow IT Identification: Detects unauthorized IT activity to maintain security.
Cloud Service Risk Assessments: Offers detailed evaluations of cloud services' risks.
Data Loss Prevention: Protects against accidental or deliberate data breaches.
User Behavior Analytics: Analyzes user actions for potential security threats.
Security Insights: Provides comprehensive reports to understand security posture.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Threat Protection: Offers robust measures against potential security risks.
Compliance: Assists with industry regulations and standards adherence.
Integration Capabilities: Enhances protection by integrating with existing infrastructure.
User Experience: Easy navigation despite needing interface improvements.
Cloud Security: Secures cloud environments effectively.

In sectors like finance, healthcare, and technology, companies implement Skyhigh Security for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities. It helps secure access to SaaS applications and protects against threats, ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements and preventing data breaches while optimizing performance in cloud environments.

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Western Union.Aetna.DirecTV.Adventist.Equinix.Perrigo.Goodyear.HP.Cargill.Sony.Bank of the West.Prudential.