Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs InfoScale comparison

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Read 9 InfoScale reviews

1,804 Views
144 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

Check Point WAF and InfoScale are both leading solutions in the cybersecurity and IT infrastructure domain. Check Point WAF appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced automation and AI capabilities which excel in reducing false positives and offering superior threat detection and prevention.

Features: Check Point WAF provides robust features including quick deployment, centralized management, and high automation with minimal manual intervention. Its AI capabilities for threat detection are noteworthy, significantly reducing false positives. InfoScale is highlighted for its stability, high availability characteristics, and resilient failover capabilities, alongside its robust storage management and disaster recovery features.

Room for Improvement: Check Point WAF could enhance its API integration, user interface, and expand its threat intelligence features. Users desire better training modules and clearer documentation to simplify setup processes. InfoScale would benefit from modern enhancements such as cloud integrations and improved inter-system visibility. Concerns around its licensing and cost impact smaller organizational access.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point WAF offers flexible deployment across various cloud environments, with responsive customer support though global language options could improve. In contrast, InfoScale primarily supports on-premises deployments, advantageous for traditional IT setups. However, its customer service has encountered transitional challenges which have affected user experiences negatively.

Pricing and ROI: Despite its higher cost, Check Point WAF is considered valuable for the ROI due to its reduction in incidents and administrative tasks. In contrast, InfoScale's expensive licensing is criticized as a barrier for mid-sized companies. Both products show ROI through enhanced operational efficiency and security, though Check Point users note significant cost savings in reduced tool necessity.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: July 2026).

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (5th), DevSecOps (2nd)

InfoScale

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

19th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (26th), High Availability Clustering (1st), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (14th), Data Storage for Kubernetes (2nd), Autonomous Operational Resilience (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InfoScale is 0.1%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	0.7%
InfoScale	0.1%
Other	99.2%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

TABISH JAVED

Site Reliability Engineer (Certified) at Kyndryl India

Automated recovery has minimized downtime and supports seamless multi‑datacenter failover

Beyond pricing, there are areas where I would like to see InfoScale improved or enhanced. Veritas offers three management approaches. The first, which Veritas currently recommends, is Veritas Operation Manager. The second is the Cluster Manager Java Console graphical interface. The Cluster Manager Java Console has not been revised since version 6.1 or 6.2. This tool was critical for me, particularly valuable when managing small cluster footprints of 20 to 30 server nodes. I relied heavily on this tool, but Veritas has moved away from it in favor of Operation Manager. I recommend Veritas continue evolving this tool rather than discarding it. The third approach is the command line, suitable for individuals with extensive Veritas expertise and experience, but command line use in live environments consumed excessive time, leading me to prefer the graphical interface. Apart from pricing, I have not discovered disadvantages. The product is excellent. My concern is Veritas discarding the Cluster Manager Java Console in favor of Veritas Operation Manager. Setting up Operation Manager requires time and a dedicated server that runs continuously. I had to create a single server just for Veritas Operation Manager. While this works well for larger environments with hundreds of clusters, it is less useful for smaller deployments. I still recommend Veritas reconsider this application and evolve it by incorporating new features from Veritas Operation Manager. Adding these new features to the Java console would be beneficial because that tool runs on my laptop without consuming environment resources, and I can connect directly to clusters from my laptop. I am not opposing Veritas Operation Manager, which is excellent and resembles hardware management consoles for power machines, but smaller tools that previously performed these tasks should remain as options to provide clients with greater ease. From a features and functionality perspective, I do not find missing features in InfoScale at this moment. However, I am not actively using Veritas, managing only legacy machines on older hardware. I am upgrading operating systems but not Veritas due to contract expiration and end-of-life status. The contract is not being renewed because the customer wants to move away. Since I have not logged into VCS since 2021 and transferred responsibilities to another team, I am unaware of features arriving in version 8 or beyond and cannot comment specifically on recent Veritas introductions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the best features of CloudGuard WAF is its user-friendly GUI dashboard."

"In short, Check Point CloudGuard WAF is a powerful tool."

"The solution's strongest point is that you can connect everything to it, giving you a full view of what's connected."

"The integration with other Microsoft products, especially Visual Studio, is seamless."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF works well for preemptively blocking Zero Day attacks and detecting hidden anomalies."

"Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is especially valuable because of its cloud-native architecture and AI autonomous protection capabilities."

"I rate it ten out of ten."

"We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pros

"The best feature is that it supports high availability and automatic failover, which minimizes downtime and helps the environment reduce downtime and improve high availability for critical applications."

"InfoScale's ability to maintain data integrity and availability during a cyber event such as a ransomware attack is excellent."

"From a recovery standpoint, InfoScale is excellent and easy to manage."

"InfoScale does that all by itself without any dependency on different solutions."

"It offers High Availability for many applications, including Oracle and SAP environment."

"It integrates well with other solutions."

"The best feature in InfoScale is the file system, which is the greatest feature as you can get any storage LUN from any hardware because it's software-defined and create a volume that can consist of storage from two or more different vendors, which avoids any vendor lock-in and makes it easier when you expand as time goes."

"It's a stable solution."

More InfoScale pros

Cons

"I see areas for improvement primarily on the reporting functionality front, as there are very limited functions in the reporting section."

"AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate; that is the advantage of FortiGate now."

"You need to know exactly the system. You cannot have someone running the system if they don't have the knowledge to do so."

"While the GUI allows configuration for application-related features, specific definitions cannot be modified through the code."

"As a reseller, the most difficult part is the lack of awareness."

"The creation of security profiles for each application takes a lot of time."

"The web user interface needs some improvement, even though the functionality is good."

"They should improve in the delivery of more detailed reports with more information."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) cons

"The primary concern is licensing cost, as the customer is unwilling to invest further and has begun cost-cutting measures."

"It could be more stable and more secure."

"While InfoScale is mainly used by enterprise-level customers, it does not inherently support many applications, which presents a scalability issue."

"Many customers can see the benefit of InfoScale, but they are usually not able to purchase the product because the license cost is very high."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go for it anyways."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that pricing is a little higher and should be reduced since most companies cannot afford it."

"It's very difficult to implement."

"Based on my experience with support, I would rate them a nine, only because occasionally the first person I talk to does not know more than I do and it needs to be escalated to reach someone more knowledgeable."

More InfoScale cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"I find the pricing to be reasonable."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."

"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

"It is not cheap, but it is worth it."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing and cost advice

"Our clients pay for licensing on a yearly basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	34

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas InfoScale Availability?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go f...

What needs improvement with Veritas InfoScale Availability?

InfoScale can be improved if it added more robust reporting features; it has reporting, but it is very simple. If it created an integration with a reporting tool that makes it official, customers c...

What is your primary use case for Veritas InfoScale Availability?

My main use case for InfoScale is that we use it in many scenarios. In some scenarios, we use it for clustering for a product like Enterprise Vault, using InfoScale Enterprise, where we handle the ...

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 7% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

Windows Server Failover Clustering vs InfoScale

Compared 13% of the time

Portworx Enterprise vs InfoScale

Compared 11% of the time

IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs InfoScale

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Platform Computing LSF vs InfoScale

Compared 10% of the time

HPE Serviceguard vs InfoScale

Compared 9% of the time

More InfoScale Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

August 2026

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Download InfoScale product report

August 2026

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

Veritas InfoScale Availability, Arctera InfoScale for Kubernetes

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

InfoScale delivers robust data availability and protection for enterprises by managing critical workloads across hybrid cloud environments, ensuring minimal downtime and seamless performance.

InfoScale is designed to enhance data resilience and operational efficiency. By enabling quick data access across hybrid infrastructures, it reduces potential downtime and enhances business continuity. Its scalable architecture adapts to dynamic workloads, providing reliable performance under pressure while maintaining seamless integration with cloud-based solutions.

What are the key features of InfoScale?

Data Resiliency: Ensures continuous data availability through advanced clustering and replication technologies.
Scalability: Supports dynamic scaling to meet changing demands without compromising performance.
Cloud Integration: Offers seamless transition and operation within cloud environments.
Automated Operations: Streamlines management processes with automation to reduce manual intervention.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Uptime: Improved reliability translates to reduced business interruption.
Cost Efficiency: Potentially lowers operational costs through optimized resource allocation.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection measures for critical data assets.
Operational Agility: Facilitates swift adaptation to evolving business requirements.

InfoScale is particularly effective in sectors such as healthcare and finance where data integrity and uptime are crucial. Its implementation empowers industries to handle data-intensive operations efficiently, ensuring continuity and compliance with industry standards.

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Wayne State University, Zenith Mart