Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs ZoneAlarm comparison

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) and ZoneAlarm are both solutions in the Anti-Malware Tools category. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while ZoneAlarm is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.5. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) holds a 0.6% mindshare in Anti-Malware Tools, compared to ZoneAlarm’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of ZoneAlarm users who would recommend it.

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

Read 62 Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) reviews

6,569 Views
591 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

ZoneAlarm

Read 13 ZoneAlarm reviews

1,747 Views
1,415 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

ZoneAlarm

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

ZoneAlarm and Check Point Harmony SASE are competing in the network security solutions category. ZoneAlarm's simplified pricing makes it attractive for budget-conscious users, but Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more comprehensive feature set, lending it an edge for enterprises seeking advanced protection.

Features: ZoneAlarm provides robust firewall protection, anti-ransomware capabilities, and secure browsing, making it ideal for personal and small business use. It ensures two-way firewall security alongside antivirus/antispyware functionalities. Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced threat prevention, secure remote access, and a unified security approach, suitable for enterprises with complex networks. It also includes advanced malware protection, URL filtering, and zero-trust network access.

Room for Improvement: ZoneAlarm could enhance its documentation clarity and reduce update frequency, making it more user-friendly. Additionally, integration with other security platforms could be improved. Check Point Harmony SASE may benefit from a simplified pricing model to appeal to smaller enterprises. Also, the solution could streamline its setup process, particularly for less tech-savvy users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ZoneAlarm is recognized for its straightforward setup and responsive customer support, simplifying individual and small business deployments. Meanwhile, Check Point Harmony SASE offers a streamlined cloud-based model with sophisticated management tools and reliable customer service, accommodating larger organizational needs with extensive customization options.

Pricing and ROI: ZoneAlarm presents cost-effective solutions with significant ROI for its target market, mainly personal and small businesses. In contrast, Check Point Harmony SASE, despite a higher initial cost, provides extensive security functionalities deemed valuable for a positive long-term ROI in corporate environments requiring comprehensive protection measures.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ZoneAlarm Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ZoneAlarm

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,901 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (6th), Firewalls (13th), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (7th), ZTNA as a Service (4th), ZTNA (3rd), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (5th)

ZoneAlarm

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ZoneAlarm is 2.4%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Anti-Malware Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)	0.6%
ZoneAlarm	2.4%
Other	97.0%

Anti-Malware Tools

Featured Reviews

Nasseer Qureshi

Pre Sales Consultant at Redington Group

Delivers seamless and secure remote access while enhancing security posture

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers strong features, but there are areas that could be improved. One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers. It works with standard SAML and SSO, but we would prefer deeper integrations with solutions such as Ping for more advanced identity-based policies. Additionally, a mobile-specific client or lightweight agent would be helpful for securing access from smartphones, especially in BYOD environments. We would appreciate more granular reporting and analytics, including better drill-down capabilities to investigate specific users or app activity. The logs are comprehensive, but filtering them can sometimes feel messy. The user interface on the management portal could be more intuitive, especially when managing multiple sites or remote offices. Some of the policy configuration steps are nested and could be streamlined.

Read full review

Bala_Krishna

Director at esupport Solutions Pvt ltd

Security suite has protected individual devices from threats, while installation and network features require improvements

BIG-IP is actually the LTM, Link Load Balancer, which comes with ASM, meaning Application Security Module. It consists of multiple modules, such as ASM, SWG, and a domain DNS manager. ZoneAlarm allows defining trusted and public networks, which helps maintain security in public Wi-Fi environments. It offers comprehensive protection, securing PCs against threats. Users do not experience any system slowdowns while scanning. Harmony Browser protects all your browsing activity and is bundled with Harmony Endpoint and Harmony Connect. It provides a small but effective security layer and sometimes comes packaged with the larger Harmony suite.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The characteristics that I have liked the most are the ease of implementation and administration."

"Providing access and security allows our company employees to work from home and remotely."

"It helps to quickly get access to the pages I need."

"The tool is easy to use and set up."

"The integration that this solution has with the different routers or perimeter equipment is exceptional."

"I appreciate the console of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) because everything is well-centralized in one place."

"The scalability is good, and I'd give it an eight out of ten."

"The application control and granular access feature are very easy to use, intuitive, and effective."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pros

"The phone access scan stands out as the most valuable feature for me."

"The solution maintains reasonable scalability."

"It is quick and easy to configure."

"The product's most valuable feature is the detection engine due to its ability to identify threats."

"ZoneAlarm protects all computers from viruses, spyware, and hackers."

"This antivirus is regularly updated, and the updates can be scheduled."

"Personally, I find the Game Mode of the Firewall very useful."

"It is easy to use through interfaces and easy to configure each of the customizations we created based on the characteristics that we wanted."

More ZoneAlarm pros

Cons

"There is an issue when installing the Check Point client."

"They could improve on the available public documentation."

"When I'm raising a ticket for Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81), it's a bit technical for non-technical people."

"An improvement could be made in terms of achieving better coverage in such complicated regions as the Asia Pacific, China, and Russia."

"Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) could be improved as there's complexity during initial configuration, and there's a learning curve."

"Offering in-app explanations detailing what each feature does, its benefits and potential use cases can help users better understand and utilize the tool to its full potential."

"Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity."

"There is a hefty cost"

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) cons

"Currently, the client is only available for the Windows Operating System but it would be good if it were released for Mac OS as well."

"ZoneAlarm should be a light application that does not take too much memory in mobile phones."

"We'd like better performance of the network equipment. There are high-speed environments where an immediate response is required."

"I would like it to be integrated with the Check Point centralization solution like Infinity Portal. It would be great to be able to manage it through the same website."

"Some of our users say that the interface is a little bit outdated for 2020, and want it to be more modern and cozy."

"Perhaps the primary area for potential enhancement is to make it faster, ensuring a more seamless experience while maintaining robust security features."

"They should release a single update with all the necessary characteristics to avoid being in a cycle of consecutive updates."

"They need to update and improve the features available for Mac."

More ZoneAlarm cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the solution's licenses depends on the particular use cases."

"The solution's pricing model may not be suitable for smaller companies, as they might find it expensive. Larger companies tend to receive more value due to many users."

"The pricing is good, especially when you compare it to other firewall or UTM solutions from FortiGate or SonicWall, where you would have to invest about four hundred thousand rupees for 100 users over a three-year period."

"Regarding pricing, I can say that the more the number of users, the less they have to pay."

"The solution is priced appropriately considering its uses. For an essential license, a user pays only 30 USD per month. For an enterprise version, the prices can be negotiated with the company."

"Perimeter 81 charges separately for gateways and VPN connectivity, but compared to Azure, it seemed more reasonable."

"Overall I am very happy with the solution’s flexibility and pricing."

"I would rate Harmony Connect's pricing at six out of ten. It wasn't particularly expensive, but it wasn't super cheap either."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pricing and cost advice

"We use the free version of the software, but it can be upgraded to the paid Extreme Security edition."

"The pricing is reasonable, with a yearly renewal license costing seventy dollars."

"We have to pay a yearly licensing fee for ZoneAlarm, which is cheap."

"This is a freeware product and I recommend using it."

"I rate the product pricing a seven out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

13%

Hospitality Company

10%

Educational Organization

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	53
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Harmony Connect?

The product's initial setup phase is very simple.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Harmony Connect?

I am not aware of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing, but I would say the setup cost is our resource, and we have invested many hours into this project.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Harmony Connect?

Check Point Harmony SASE needs improvement as it is a very new product that lacks very basic features, and it can start working more with the customer for better implementation. The product is lack...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ZoneAlarm?

ZoneAlarm has an acceptable price. Not much detail can be provided as I am not the one to judge the price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ZoneAlarm?

Check Point support needs improvement. Currently rated at 9 out of 10, more support is required. There are some concerns on support that need addressing. The integration of new products with their ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ZoneAlarm?

I work with vendors such as F5 and deal with F5 as a reseller. I work with F5 BIG-IP regarding F5 Shape Security. BIG-IP Advanced WAF is what I work with regarding BIG-IP DNS or BIG-IP AFM. Advance...

See all answers

Comparisons

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 9% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 9% of the time

Netskope vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 6% of the time

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 6% of the time

OpenVPN Access Server vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 4% of the time

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ZoneAlarm

Compared 36% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs ZoneAlarm

Compared 10% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs ZoneAlarm

Compared 7% of the time

Bitdefender Security for AWS vs ZoneAlarm

Compared 6% of the time

Avira Antivirus vs ZoneAlarm

Compared 6% of the time

More ZoneAlarm Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

January 2026

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) report

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) product report

Buyer's Guide

ZoneAlarm

December 2025

Download ZoneAlarm product report

Also Known As

Check Point Quantum SASE

No data available

Overview

Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers robust security features like split tunneling, MFA, and Zero Trust Network Access focused on secure remote access and optimized connectivity for remote teams.

Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced security through a user-friendly interface, efficient VPN connections, and a centralized management console. It enhances security with real-time threat intelligence from ThreatCloud and traffic management via built-in optimization. Firewall as a Service and Secure Web Gateway safeguard against unauthorized access and phishing. While users seek enhanced networking customizations and better integration with identity providers, there's an emphasis on improving reporting, real-time analytics, and policy management. Requests also include a Chrome extension, traffic balancing, and simplified configuration to address some resource-intensive aspects.

What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?

Split Tunneling: Manages internet traffic more efficiently by routing only necessary data through the VPN.
MFA: Provides an additional layer of security through multi-factor authentication.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure connections by validating every user and device.
ThreatCloud: Enhances protection with real-time threat intelligence.
Firewall as a Service: Protects against unauthorized access and threats.
Secure Web Gateway: Prevents phishing attacks and unauthorized internet access.

How can organizations benefit from using Check Point Harmony SASE?

Improved Security: Real-time threat intelligence and robust authentication minimize risks.
Centralized Management: Simplifies control over network security and policies.
Optimized Connectivity: Efficient traffic routing enhances user experience.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing IT infrastructure, enhancing strategic security deployment.

Check Point Harmony SASE is used across industries for secure remote access and connectivity, protecting sensitive data, and managing access to corporate resources. It is ideal for those with hybrid cloud models and requires comprehensive security measures combined with existing IT infrastructures to meet specific industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

ZoneAlarm protects you by preventing hackers from remotely accessing and controlling your device, and lets you know which apps have excessive permissions so you can decide whether they threaten your privacy.

Check Point Software Technologies

Sample Customers

Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith

Terma, Optix, Samsung Research Amercia, SF Police Credit Union, Independence Care System, Mattias Thomsen, Carmel Partners, Desert Research Institute, CRIF, FXCM Inc, US State Agency

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ZoneAlarm

December 2025

Free Report: Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ZoneAlarm

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ZoneAlarm and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ZoneAlarm report.

See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.

We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.